She was the leader in that relationship. She certainly  was not naive and I even wonder if he was his first. He’s just a fool crazy for a twenty year old woman.

Clancy: Right now, I would refuse to serve on a jury.   I don't want my life broadcast to the world if there was anything that other jurors or attorneys didn't like.

Thank you guys so much for the clarification on what Redington is doing.  I was so confused.  So I was kind of right when I said he is throwing everything at the wall to see what sticks.

Such a great break down on this situation  post trail Eric! I love listing to all of you break things down.  You guys are so Awesome!

So appreciate all three of you! I learn a lot and I am heartened by your demonstration of compassion and critical thinking. I’m glad you stopped calling the mistress “side piece.”

LOVE you guys. Great show.
Lower your big mic looks funny I imo ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

I doubt the Smiths would even consider suing their church

I didn’t think you could have your phone during deliberations.

Alienation of affection

Maybe don’t send summons to people with records to begin wirh

Yes.

What about the sell of the vehicle house etc

Unfortunately the judge did not question the hold out juror. If he had, he may have discovered more detail than what the foreperson said. I believe Reddington took what the foreperson said as fact and ran with that; which makes the point that he hold out refused to follow the law. But that was only one side of the story, he should have waited until he  heard the other side from the hold out. I think ultimately this is the judge's fault for not interviewing the hold out for his side of the story before making his decision.

Reddington: Best Lawyer! But I think he's too good to lower himself to going after a juror. Too many consequences by setting such a precedence

You should go to jail if you go into court and lie under oath, you should go to jail for lying

they should go after her so she never has piece of mind. Ashley would still be alive if she didn’t have a hand in it

What about lady juror has same thing .. why not talking about her

not impressed by that church/head pastor. ashley's family should go to another church...then, they could sue. would be easier..

They did not BIFURCATE this trial. Against Reddington filings BEFORE this trial. Massachusetts rolled 2 trials into one and did a half ass job on each. Commonwealth failed to prove based on forensic evidence and not just hearsay of 1 man, the husband, and second that she wasn’t experiencing a mental health crisis. Stipulating Not Guilty by reason of insanity was COURT STRATEGY when the rolling of 2 separate cases rolled into one and her Massachusetts had tunnel vision, never questioned the realm of possibility that it wasn’t her. If you want to have clear accountable Justice, you should be able to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. If they can’t do that, who is safe based on the word of one person that has financial and mistress, Rachel Danis as a motive. You were able to see this in the Caleb Flynn trial but not here?

The MISSEDPIECE not mistress. Lol