The mighty West Indies ruled cricket for about 20 years and gave the world some of the best cricketers. However, the decline post 1995 has been equally spectacular, making many wonder what went so drastically wrong in a team full of champion cricketers. Our guest Shishir Hattangadi explains the reasons that led to the graph dipping for West Indies mid 1990s onwards in this episode of A Century of Stories: Cricket podcast presented by IDFC FIRST Bank.
-----------
The complementing visuals or b-rolls (both images & videos) used in the video are either AI-generated or have been acquired from a licensed source. Some visuals may be used for representation purposes only.
00:00 - 02:40 - Intro
02:41 - 04:55 - What West Indies were like under Lloyd
04:56 - 7:05 - Richards' leadership and seeds of decline sown
07:06 - 10:30 - Issues with Board and talent drain
10:31 - 16:20 - The enigma that was Carl Hooper
16:21 - 18:45 - The impact of not playing County Cricket
18:46 - 25:40 - Did Lara's superstardom hurt West Indies?
25:41 - 31:40 - Talent drying up in case of lack of inspiration
31:41 - 34:00 - Is a revival possible?
34:01 - 35:10 - Decline of West Indian quicks
35:11 - 37:50 - T20 leagues hurting West Indies cricket?
37:51 - 42:27 - The Rebel Tours that started the rot
The mighty West Indies ruled cricket for about 20 years and gave the world some of the best cricketers. However, the decline post 1995 has been equally spectacular, making many wonder what went so drastically wrong in a team full of champion cricketers. Our guest Shishir Hattangadi explains the reasons that led to the graph dipping for West Indies mid 1990s onwards in this episode of A Century of Stories: Cricket podcast presented by IDFC FIRST Bank.
-----------
The complementing visuals or b-rolls (both images & videos) used in the video are either AI-generated or have been acquired from a licensed source. Some visuals may be used for representation purposes only.
00:00 - 02:40 - Intro
02:41 - 04:55 - What West Indies were like under Lloyd
04:56 - 7:05 - Richards' leadership and seeds of decline sown
07:06 - 10:30 - Issues with Board and talent drain
10:31 - 16:20 - The enigma that was Carl Hooper
16:21 - 18:45 - The impact of not playing County Cricket
18:46 - 25:40 - Did Lara's superstardom hurt West Indies?
25:41 - 31:40 - Talent drying up in case of lack of inspiration
31:41 - 34:00 - Is a revival possible?
34:01 - 35:10 - Decline of West Indian quicks
35:11 - 37:50 - T20 leagues hurting West Indies cricket?
37:51 - 42:27 - The Rebel Tours that started the rot
Our top players were poorly paid despite being the best & drawing huge crowds at test matches & (don't forget) warm up games overseas.
The administrators were complacent for decades over player succession planning, player development/rest & recuperation.
At times then WI didn't play enough international/regional matches each year to keep promising players active. Sometimes our international/regional calendar ended as early as April after a home test series.
In the late 70s I felt the West Indies should have broken up into 6 International teams as the depth of talent at junior and club levels across the region was insane.
You mention that (test) Barbados team of the 1970s. Not to mention Franklyn Stevenson, Moseley, Padmore.
Here in Jamaica then we had a club team called Kensington that included: Rowe, Richard Austin, Herbert Chang, Basil Williams and Desmond Lewis . Yet they weren't even in the top 2 teams in that league.
So a lot of good talent just gave up due to lack of opportunities and emigrated to North America incl. Basil Williams.
In the early 1980s some of us would tell you that the best bastman in the West Indies was Antiguan Ralston Otto but just didn't get his chance in the test arena.
Our established test batsmen then we're undroppable even when their regional form was poor.
A teenage batsman such as Mark Neita took on Andy Roberts but had zero chance of West Indian cricket and went into business.
Tony Gray was just unlucky to be around when Ambrose, Walsh, Bishop etc were playing.
There was that time Lara suggested fitness coach Dennis Waite go easy on the training as some players complained it was too hard.
That's when things started to dropped off big time.
One scenario that showed up the player's lack of commitment in the 2000s was when Gayle captained the WI team to England but wanted time off during the tour to play in a white ball tournament.
By breaking up into 6 teams the respective governments would be forced invest more in cricket in their country or just sink.
Some countries such as Jamaica has a dismal record at investing in serious cricket. The women's game is nonexistent there.
When Ashwin last toured the West Indies he was shocked by the poor standard of cricketing facilities.
Back in the day WI was united by identity and anticolonialsm that created a passion to do well.
Subsequent generations think differently and representing their nation seems to be a burden than a honour.
Today, kids tend to play cricket mostly at school. Back in the 1970s cricket was played on roads and the numerous open land spaces.
Now, working and middle class families reside in purpose built major housing developments where access to play outdoor sports is nonexistent due to lack of enough play areas.
By the 2010s our cricketing leaders fell into the trap of developing so called specialists white ball players when the top players in other national teams are equally proficient in white and red ball formats.
Today our batsmen are well paid -some benchwarmers at IPL - but still cannot do the fundamentals like manipulating the fields for quick singles. They have the same batting flaws throughout their career and never seem to improve. E.g. Rovman Powell versus spin. Chase & Braithwaite vs extreme pace.