'A Second Brexit Referendum Would Be ‘A Waste Of Time And Energy’' Same as the first one.

MI5 worrying about universities

Meanwhile our border is non existent

I can't wait to hear Brexiters like Fargage defend their statements in the light of a decade of data and lived experience.

I am ok with the second referendum as long as we get the third referendum to Brexit again.

When the abusers are recalled to prison, where do we put them?

Hugo's head about to explode when faced with a litany of EU policy failures. Bless him.

Not sure if Reform  would  be any different Farage  is pro Russian  and gets well paid by the kremlin and he would  privatise our NHS  they aren't for the people  of this country.

Moving production abroad, just like what is happening to all chemicals and pharmaceuticals.

The tragedy of people believing that re-joining the EU will solve these problems. I understand that desperation. They say that devolution for more control is worthwhile, yet not at a national level. They say that re-joining will help us economically, but when we compare European countries over that period there is no real difference. We have a growth and jobs crisis, as do our neighbours. Opening the borders to even more low wage competition isn't a solution. Just blindly shouting 'in' or 'out' is just so, so simplistic.

Just as Von Der Leyen and her EU Commissioners approach their Thermidorian Reaction Moment, now known as a tipping point.

A lesson from Australia. In 1999, Australia held a referendum on becoming a republic. All polling showed a clear majority in favour. However, in Australia a referendum must have a specific proposal and so the model of electing a head of state - a president - was specifically stated. Many Australian republicans voted against because they didn’t like the system proposed. An Aussie republican friend told me voted against because he thought, “Australians would vote for someone like Shane Warne” under the system proposed.

Leaving the EU required a simple ‘in/out’ question because we could not negotiate relations with any other country until we left. Rejoining will require a specific deal. As in Australia, there will be lots of people who like the idea of rejoining, but will not sign up to the specific deal on offer.

I fear the government will try to avoid a vote on a specific deal and instead ask a simple in/out question giving them approval to come up with what they think is the best deal.

In percentage terms Queens Park has rate of benefits than anywhere else in the UK

Give them a choice leave  jail  and serve12 months fighting in Ukraine 🇺🇦 Or stay in jail, simple 🤔

Brexit for leavers was not about well off/worse off. It was about sovereignty. It was about Britons living under laws made by their own accountable parliament. Leave/Remain are non-overlapping magisteria. The rich see the EU as a means of getting richer. The non-rich don't want laws imposed by a non-accountable foreign entity.

We will have another referendum until we get the result we want, Let's have an election now so we can get the government we want, Labour out.

So who / what are we going to blame for our problems once we’ve gone back into the EU and magically they aren’t resolved? If we were to sort our own issues out (over regulation, lack of building, self destructive energy policy, huge overbearing state etc) we could get our country back on the right track, get back to strong growth, and then the EU might be more inclined to work with us to remove friction without re-enslaving us!

Until the next election just Tiktok vibes

The Times Radio has decided to get back behind Kemi.
What an editorially lonely place to be.

If the EU was doing really well compared to Britain I could understand people wanting to go back in but the EU got all the problems we got in Britain even worse in some EU countries.

My goodness, is the Times waking up?
The two.contributors were great IMHO.