That bit where you showed Christopher Lee talking about his motivation . . . that's Christopher Lee in a nutshell. The man has never turned in a bad performance even when he knows he's in something that's total crap because he believed it was what he owed the audience. They paid money to see the film and they deserved to be entertained by something, so even if nobody else cared, he would. He put his all into EVERYTHING he did and worked hard to craft a unique performance for every character he played.
Thranduil in the book was not a greedy jerk. After Laketown was destroyed, Thranduil went to help them and, after they reached the mountain, only supported the Lakemen’s claim to the treasure. Bard rewarded him richly afterwards, but Bard was the one who got most of the share. And Thranduil was the one who counselled restraint and patience to avoid going to war over gold. Thranduil in the book was interesting to me because he was an antagonist but not a villain.
31:49 Them using the ring wraith theme in the wrong spot reminds me of the first time as a kid, I heard them use the Akatsuki theme in Naruto for a random filler episode for some random garbage and just thinking "...what?...no...you can't do that..."
Rumor has it that most of the money spent on turning Benedict Cumberbach into a dragon was actually the money they had to pay to convince him to become human again afterwards.
The whole “faithful adaptation vs Lotr prequel” idea reminds me of how, according to *History of The Hobbit*, Tolkien attempted a full revision/retelling of the Hobbit in 1960 that would fit tonally with lotr and fix all the continuity mistakes, but abandoned it because it had lost all the charm of the original version.
"You don't need a huge issue threatening the entire world or a heroic, selfless always right hero to make a compelling fantasy story"