The three biggest record labels in the world — Sony, Universal, and Warner — have come together with independent labels to propose a new framework for how AI-generated and AI-assisted music should be treated on official music charts. And what they decided might not be what artists expected.
Instead of drawing the line at whether an artist uses AI at all, the proposal focuses on whether a song is “substantially human-made.” That means artists using AI as an assistive tool could still qualify, while mass-produced, fully AI-generated music, unlicensed AI tools, streaming fraud, and fake plays are the real targets.
FREE TRAINING: Who Actually Owns Your Music in the AI Era — And What to Do About It: https://www.producelikeaboss.online/o...
IP affiliate link:
https://instantip.app?aff=8d7285f2761...
The information, ideas, and suggestions in this video are not meant to be legal advice. Before following any suggestions within this video, you should consult your personal lawyer. The speaker shall not be liable or responsible for any loss or damage allegedly arising as a consequence of your use or application of any information or suggestion in this video.
CHAPTERS
00:00 The Major Labels Just Defined a “Real Artist”
01:18 What Actually Happened
02:14 What the New AI Music Proposal Means
03:15 This Is NOT an Official Rule Yet
04:04 The 3 Biggest Rules for AI Music
05:21 Why Ownership & Documentation Matter
06:34 AI-Assisted vs. AI-Generated Music
08:35 Who These New Rules Are Really Targeting
09:49 The AI Licensing Problem
11:20 Suno, Udio & the Major Label Disagreement
12:32 What Independent Artists Should Do
13:12 3 Things This Proposal Gets Right
13:39 3 Major Questions Still Unanswered
14:20 What This Means for the Future of AI Music
15:14 How to Protect Your Music
The three biggest record labels in the world — Sony, Universal, and Warner — have come together with independent labels to propose a new framework for how AI-generated and AI-assisted music should be treated on official music charts. And what they decided might not be what artists expected.
Instead of drawing the line at whether an artist uses AI at all, the proposal focuses on whether a song is “substantially human-made.” That means artists using AI as an assistive tool could still qualify, while mass-produced, fully AI-generated music, unlicensed AI tools, streaming fraud, and fake plays are the real targets.
FREE TRAINING: Who Actually Owns Your Music in the AI Era — And What to Do About It: https://www.producelikeaboss.online/o...
IP affiliate link:
https://instantip.app?aff=8d7285f2761...
The information, ideas, and suggestions in this video are not meant to be legal advice. Before following any suggestions within this video, you should consult your personal lawyer. The speaker shall not be liable or responsible for any loss or damage allegedly arising as a consequence of your use or application of any information or suggestion in this video.
CHAPTERS
00:00 The Major Labels Just Defined a “Real Artist”
01:18 What Actually Happened
02:14 What the New AI Music Proposal Means
03:15 This Is NOT an Official Rule Yet
04:04 The 3 Biggest Rules for AI Music
05:21 Why Ownership & Documentation Matter
06:34 AI-Assisted vs. AI-Generated Music
08:35 Who These New Rules Are Really Targeting
09:49 The AI Licensing Problem
11:20 Suno, Udio & the Major Label Disagreement
12:32 What Independent Artists Should Do
13:12 3 Things This Proposal Gets Right
13:39 3 Major Questions Still Unanswered
14:20 What This Means for the Future of AI Music
15:14 How to Protect Your Music