GWR took their battery train out on an overnight trip to attempt to travel 200 miles and in doing so, set a new World Record for furthest distance acheived by a battery train.
Their train has been on test now for over a year in real world conditions - cold weather, loaded with passengers, higher speeds : but this was just to see how far the battery train could be pushed to set a new distance record.
The Scottish BEMU that Tim mentions : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British...
Railway Performance Society : https://railperf.org.uk/
CORRECTIONS
0:32 The fourth label in text box says ‘Reading to Paddington’ when it should be ‘Paddington to Reading’
You can join Memberships on this channel to get access to perks:
@geofftech2
GWR took their battery train out on an overnight trip to attempt to travel 200 miles and in doing so, set a new World Record for furthest distance acheived by a battery train.
Their train has been on test now for over a year in real world conditions - cold weather, loaded with passengers, higher speeds : but this was just to see how far the battery train could be pushed to set a new distance record.
The Scottish BEMU that Tim mentions : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British...
Railway Performance Society : https://railperf.org.uk/
CORRECTIONS
0:32 The fourth label in text box says ‘Reading to Paddington’ when it should be ‘Paddington to Reading’
You can join Memberships on this channel to get access to perks:
@geofftech2
A few FAQs I've seen:
How fast did it go?
We ran using a 'sawtooth' profile, accelerating at max power then coasting down by 5 mph, which is the most efficient way to drive this train. We chose 30-35, 35-40 or 40-45 mph depending on whether we were catching up any trains ahead. Remember that the Elizabeth line averages 40 mph from Paddington to Reading so having to apply the brakes (and waste energy) when catching something up was a problem. The path we found was the very first slot into London after midnight and the very last slot back out before the morning peak, so was definitely a case of threading the needle.
It would never reach 200 miles in realistic conditions?
Yes, because this was a stunt to try to push the train as far as possible and beat the world record. By running non stop with no heating, we were able to make it 4x more efficient than normal, which is pretty crazy given than it's the same train running at the same speeds (slightly faster even) as it would in service on the Greenford branch.
How far would it have gone if you went faster?
We reckon around 150 miles would be possible at full speed (60 mph), Vs the potential 260 miles we could have achieved at 30-45 mph.
How long would it take to recharge afterwards?
In theory around half an hour up to 80%, but charging all the way to 100% takes a very long time due to the batteries reaching their maximum voltage. Future iterations would charge in half this time.