He Doesn’t Deny the DNA—He Says He Can’t Remember - Eugene Gligor Interrogation

Crime Cracked

Crime Cracked

4,931 views

Eugene Gligor interrogation analysis: Montgomery County cold-case detectives confront Eugene Gligor with DNA evidence linking him to the 2001 murder of Leslie Preer in Chevy Chase, Maryland. This police interrogation and true crime documentary breakdown examines the 23-year cold case, forensic genetic genealogy, the discarded Dulles International Airport water bottle that confirmed the DNA match, and Gligor’s repeated claim that he could not remember what happened.

We analyze the detectives’ interrogation strategy, Gligor’s guarded answers, his shifting memory, the moment investigators reveal the DNA evidence, his requests for an attorney and the confrontation that causes his controlled demeanor to give way to anger.

Leslie Preer was found murdered inside her home after failing to report to work. DNA recovered from the crime scene and beneath her fingernails produced no match for more than two decades. In 2022, investigators used forensic genetic genealogy to construct a family tree that eventually pointed toward Gligor, a former boyfriend of Leslie’s daughter. Detectives then recovered a water bottle he discarded at Dulles Airport and confirmed the DNA match.

Gligor was arrested on June 18, 2024, and initially charged with first-degree murder. On May 7, 2025, he pleaded guilty to the reduced charge of second-degree murder. He was later sentenced to 30 years with all but 22 years suspended, followed by five years of supervised probation. His motive remains unclear.

Watch until the DNA confrontation and tell us in the comments: what stands out most about the way Gligor responds? Subscribe for more police interrogations, cold-case investigations and evidence-based true crime analysis.

DISCLAIMER: This video is presented for documentary, educational and commentary purposes. It discusses a real homicide and may contain disturbing subject matter. Interpretations of speech, emotion and demeanor are opinion—not psychological diagnosis or independent proof of guilt. A court ruled that much of the conversation following Gligor’s requests for counsel would have been inadmissible at trial. Gligor’s legal responsibility was established through his guilty plea. Please do not contact or harass anyone connected to this case. Viewer discretion is advised.

#EugeneGligor #PoliceInterrogation #TrueCrime