To dislike this film in particular is one thing. There's always subjectivity when it comes to liking or disliking anything. But for Siskel to say we shouldn't have films depicting violence towards women because we get enough of that in real-life is a disturbing opinion for a critic. The point of art is to not be constrained by the comfort levels of the masses.
Wow, imagine calling The Silence of the Lambs "trashy" and saying it's a career lowlight for Jonathan Demme. Siskel had some bizarre reactions to some great films over the years.
Amazing how Ebert so totally nailed the film (and perfectly encapsulates the manner in which it will be/is remembered). Siskel's so focused on it as a 'horror movie' that that he simply misses the brilliant acting, directing and excellent screenplay that elevate the movie to near-greatness.
Siskel is so cocky here. How he says to Roger that "You`re easy, but as for me..." He is in effect saying that he is so much smarter. "You got fooled, but I was too smart to be fooled".