Sovereign Citizen Claims He Went Pro Se "Under Duress" — Judge Instantly Strips His Rights!
Justice Sem Filtros
11,221 views
Sovereign Citizen Nicholas McKini thought he could outsmart the court by going pro se — but his OWN words became his worst enemy. Watch as the judge seizes on McKini's "under duress" claim to STRIP his right to represent himself. The script ran out, and so did his defense. 🔨
📋 CASE DETAILS:
Case No. 23 CR 5137 | People v. Nicholas McKini | Colorado
McKini fired his lawyer, went pro se, then botched EVERYTHING — filed subpoenas just 14 days before trial (when the rules require 48 days), confused "Title 17" with "Rule 17," and then made the FATAL mistake of telling the judge he went pro se "under duress." The judge didn't miss a beat — if he's under duress, he can't knowingly and voluntarily represent himself. Pro se status? GONE. His sovereign citizen script? USELESS.
⚖️ WHAT HAPPENS IN THIS VIDEO:
⏱ 0:00 — McKini's subpoena disaster exposed
⏱ 5:12 — Prosecutor dismantles his timeline — 14 days vs. 48 days required
⏱ 12:30 — McKini drops the "under duress" bomb
⏱ 18:45 — Judge seizes on duress claim — pro se status in jeopardy
⏱ 25:00 — The moment McKini realizes he outsmarted HIMSELF
⏱ 30:15 — Judge reappoints counsel — sovereign citizen defense is OVER
⏱ 38:00 — Trial vacated, McKini left speechless
20 Comments
"Your best sucks" - the court
Three years this moron has prolonged this case, can you imagine the money he has costs the taxpayers.
Sovereign Citizen Claims He Went Pro Se "Under Duress" — Judge Instantly Strips His Rights!
Justice Sem Filtros
11,221 views
Sovereign Citizen Nicholas McKini thought he could outsmart the court by going pro se — but his OWN words became his worst enemy. Watch as the judge seizes on McKini's "under duress" claim to STRIP his right to represent himself. The script ran out, and so did his defense. 🔨
📋 CASE DETAILS:
Case No. 23 CR 5137 | People v. Nicholas McKini | Colorado
McKini fired his lawyer, went pro se, then botched EVERYTHING — filed subpoenas just 14 days before trial (when the rules require 48 days), confused "Title 17" with "Rule 17," and then made the FATAL mistake of telling the judge he went pro se "under duress." The judge didn't miss a beat — if he's under duress, he can't knowingly and voluntarily represent himself. Pro se status? GONE. His sovereign citizen script? USELESS.
⚖️ WHAT HAPPENS IN THIS VIDEO:
⏱ 0:00 — McKini's subpoena disaster exposed
⏱ 5:12 — Prosecutor dismantles his timeline — 14 days vs. 48 days required
⏱ 12:30 — McKini drops the "under duress" bomb
⏱ 18:45 — Judge seizes on duress claim — pro se status in jeopardy
⏱ 25:00 — The moment McKini realizes he outsmarted HIMSELF
⏱ 30:15 — Judge reappoints counsel — sovereign citizen defense is OVER
⏱ 38:00 — Trial vacated, McKini left speechless