In a world where everybody has some sort of interest in weird weapons, the FAL stands out as something unique. Let's explore the reasons why YOU should own a FAL!
Chapters
00:00 INTRO
00:44 REASON 1 - HISTORY
06:12 REASON 2 - THE CARTRIDGE
08:34 REASON 3 - COMMUNITY
10:22 REASON 4 - AFTERMARKET
12:20 REASON 5 - VIBE
13:50 CONCLUSION
Instagram:
Instagram: thefalguy308
In a world where everybody has some sort of interest in weird weapons, the FAL stands out as something unique. Let's explore the reasons why YOU should own a FAL!
Chapters
00:00 INTRO
00:44 REASON 1 - HISTORY
06:12 REASON 2 - THE CARTRIDGE
08:34 REASON 3 - COMMUNITY
10:22 REASON 4 - AFTERMARKET
12:20 REASON 5 - VIBE
13:50 CONCLUSION
Instagram:
Instagram: thefalguy308
Pros:
-ammunition availability
-modernization potential (although this is an old system by all accounts the aftermarket is fairly robust for modernization efforts. I.E new hand guards, pistol grips, ETC)
-the cartridge itself, as someone who carried a 240B in a professional capacity for several years I am fully aware of the capabilities that 7.62 x 51 NATO possess
-they’re just really cool. There is not a single range trip. I have gone to where I didn’t at least turn a few heads while shooting with this.
- solid reliability
Cons:
-the trigger, especially stock leaves a lot to be desired, but can be trained around and even sent back to DSA for a trigger job. This does make it better but understand this will not be the same kind of crisp trigger pull you would get out of a performance trigger or a nice AR trigger.
-suppression is relatively difficult to tune for. If not already configured for suppression from the factory and additional gas plug will have to be installed replacing the OEM gas plug, which may be more trouble than it’s worth some people.
-huge variation in magazine quality. Understand that if you decide to go with this platform, the quality of magazines will vary greatly between manufacturers. I’ve had the opportunity to try a few different magazines, including Israeli, SADF and luckily enough, one single Rhodesian metal mag along with DS arms all polymer 20 round magazines. All of which have had some pretty wide variance in quality and reliability. (the polymer mags seemed to have weaker feed lips and I am currently looking at 3-D printing new magazines, then embedding thin steel to reinforce the feed lips but that is an ongoing project)
-ammunition cost. Running a gun especially a 762 rifle of any variety is not cheap, especially with recent hikes in ammo prices even ball ammunition has become not impossible, but definitely more difficult to source in large quantities and for the same price as you were able to get it for before.
-accuracy when purchasing this rifle, you need to understand that Lyle capable and with a relatively solid barrel you are still gonna have to do some leg work with testing out various loads of ammunition to maximize accuracy. With FDI 149 grain 7.62 NATO I’m printing about 4MOA or just under at 100 yards. We are as with match ammunition I’ve had as low as 1.8 MOA.
-magazine capacity. Like the FAL guy has touched on various times over various videos 20 round magazines are by far the most common type of magazine you will find and although the number of us who may read this comment will ever be in a firefight with the FAL could be counted on a single hand understand that ammunition capacity matters. The side that has more ammunition and more guns will usually be the one that is victorious.
-cost for the actual unit. Although it is possible to find these rifles for cheaper than MSRP understand that they are still going to run you close or over 2K generally and if you are looking for a more accurate battle, rifle and cost is not a large hurdle. I would say save up another $1500 to buy a SCAR 17 instead.
Understand this is a sample size of one, but I am just passing along the information I have had with my personal experience :)
Cheers and hope you are doing well. That being said, phenomenal video as always