15 Horrifying Things Scientists Found In Space
Mr Space Explainer
104,010 views
From Hoag's Object and the Boomerang Nebula to Tabby's Star, the Great Attractor, mysterious cosmic signals, vanished stars, and gravitational waves, these are 15 of the most horrifying and unexplained discoveries scientists have found in space.
Some have explanations. Others remain genuine mysteries.
14 Comments
@galens403 1 day ago
Hating AI is this generation’s ’Rock is the devil’s music’ or ‘Automobiles will never catch on!’
@MBPLLC 9 days ago
The AI makes this unwatchable. I'd prefer your own human opinion rather than a machine's. I could have just prompted ChatGPT for this.
@michaelwawryk4875 6 days ago
Does anyone else think dark matter is the code for the matrix we live in.
Just code that isn’t rendered yet.
Just code that isn’t rendered yet.
@lordcrowe9392 4 days ago
People acting like bitching about the AI is gonna stop the views. It spreads info. It makes the info on space more accessible. Who cares about the voice on it.
@karagiannisboris 9 days ago
So many candies for my paper in this video. Out of the 15 "horrifying" things listed, at least 7–8 of them are direct predictions of the Apollonian Theory of Everything.The galaxy lacking dark matter, the CMB Cold Spot, the vanishing star, the Eridanus bubbles, the early mature galaxies implied in some of these objects — all of these are natural consequences of the inward atmiton (aka gravitons) flux and radial ruler compression. No need for dark matter, dark energy, or curved spacetime.What mainstream calls "anomalies" or "horrifying mysteries" are exactly what my model expects. The video just proved my point without realizing it.
"Why Defending Ensteins Magical Pull Gravity Is Actually Hilarious"
It is actually hilarious how hard some people still defend the official magical "pull" gravity.
The push gravity side supposedly had one major historical criticism: the heating and drag problem. They said if space is filled with particles pushing everything, then objects should heat up massively and experience drag that slows them down. But that problem has now been very well addressed by modern researchers with better models using high-speed particles, elastic collisions, and proper shielding mechanisms.
And here's the kicker — we actually see enormous amounts of heat exactly where the critics said we shouldn't. The Sun is a giant ball of plasma and heat. Black holes have accretion disks reaching millions of degrees. The universe is filled with high-energy radiation. So the same people screaming about "too much heat" are now looking at a universe that's literally burning hot in many places.
Meanwhile, on the official magical pull side, the problems are endless. Here's just some of them:
They still can't explain what gravity actually is — it just magically pulls
GR was retrofitted to explain the anomalous perihelion precession of Mercury. What it actually calculates is the observable effects we see — light bending, gravitational redshift, and clocks appearing to run slower in gravity.
Instead of admitting that the "constants" were not actually constant, Einstein chose to bend space and time.
All theories will be retrofitted. No theory will ever EVER be not retrofitted. The real question is whether it actually delivers on everything we observe — and GR clearly doesn’t.
Complete failure to unify gravity with quantum mechanics after 100 years
why it’s not 2, 4, 10, or 26 dimensions.
The invention of dark matter
The invention of dark energy
The cosmological constant problem — worst prediction in science history
The Hubble tension
Galaxy rotation curves that don’t match predictions
The axis of evil in the CMB
Black hole singularity problem
Big Bang singularity problem
Black hole information paradox
The horizon problem
The flatness problem
The hierarchy problem
Origin of neutrino mass
Why gravity is 10^40 times weaker than electromagnetism
The vacuum catastrophe
Proton radius puzzle
The flyby anomaly
The arrow of time problem
Quantum measurement problem in gravity
No explanation for cosmic inflation’s inflaton field
The lithium problem in Big Bang nucleosynthesis
Missing monopoles
The coincidence problem
The nature of dark flow
Quasar alignment anomalies
The KBC void problem
No explanation for how quantum entanglement works with gravity
The muon g-2 anomaly
The neutron lifetime puzzle
The proton spin crisis
Ultra-high energy cosmic rays origin
The source of fast radio bursts
The missing baryon problem
The cuspy halo problem in galaxies
The too-big-to-fail problem
The satellite plane problem
The final parsec problem for supermassive black holes
The lack of observed white dwarf supernovae progenitors
The origin of magnetic fields in the universe
The cosmic ray knee problem
The greisen-zatsepin-kuzmin limit violation
The nature of time itself
The measurement problem in quantum mechanics
Why the universe has three spatial dimensions
The black hole firewall paradox
The trans-Planckian problem in inflation
The graceful exit problem in old inflation models
The moduli problem in string theory
The landscape problem in string theory
The Boltzmann brain problem
The faint young sun paradox
The solar corona heating mystery
The unexpected smoothness of the early universe
The lack of predicted supersymmetric particles
The strong force CP violation problem
The baryon asymmetry problem
The vacuum energy discrepancy
The origin of cosmic rays above the GZK cutoff
The source of ultra-high energy neutrinos
The Pioneer anomaly
The unexpected tilt of the solar system
The galaxy missing satellite problem
The void size problem in large scale structure
The cold spot anomaly in the CMB
The hemispherical asymmetry in the CMB
The lack of observed primordial gravitational waves
The origin of supermassive black holes in the early universe
The black hole entropy problem
The information loss paradox in evaporating black holes
The AdS/CFT correspondence limitations
The ER=EPR conjecture status
The origin of the universe’s low entropy state
The why-now problem
The KFC Ukraine problem — where even after getting blown up and destroyed, they pop back up and rebuild faster than the official theory can patch its own holes. (lol)
And dozens more unexplained issues that the push gravity path does not even create in the first place or gives a clear answer for.
and don't let me start with Halton arp:
Pretty much all of Halton Arp’s core points were never properly addressed — they were mostly ignored, dismissed, or explained away with weak excuses.His strongest observations, like the luminous bridge between NGC 4319 and Markarian 205, the statistical excess of quasars around active galaxies, discordant redshifts in physically connected objects, redshift quantization, and the “Fingers of God” effect in clusters, were never convincingly refuted. Mainstream cosmology just kept repeating “it’s coincidence” or “the bridge isn’t real” even when the evidence was sitting there in their own images.They never dealt with the actual data head-on. They just protected the redshift = distance assumption at all costs. So basically, his key points remain unaddressed to this day.
So to summarize: The push side had one old criticism that's now been properly addressed, while the official magical pull side is buried under a mountain of 50+ fundamental problems and inventions. Yet they still act like their theory is rock solid.
Make it make sense or get lost list.
Dr. Henry Lindner’s Flowing Space theory
Mike McCulloch Quantised Inertia
Tom Van Flandern — Pushing Gravity / Le Sage model
John Kierein — Radiation shadow / push gravity
Panagiotis Dalianos & Pier Franco Nali — Lesagian Gravity Redux
Gerasimos Danilatos — Push Gravity
Vijay Vishwakarma — Flux-Shadow Gravity
Shareef Ali Rashada — Graviton Pressure Theory
Dmitrii Osenilo — The Hydrodynamic Model of Gravity
Conrad Ranzan — Dynamic Aether Theory
Ors Marton — Space as an Ether Crystal
Sumeru Ray — Ray Unified Gravity Theory
Günther Kletetschka — Three-Dimensional Time Theory
James Johan Sebastian Allen — Pattern Field Theory
Steven Lizarazo — Alignment Framework
Vitor M.I. Nogueira — Dynamic Theory of the Aether
Richard J. Benish — Space Generation Model
Hamid Naghieh — Relational Origin of Gravity
Ron Garret - quantum conspiracy
and above all me with the Apollonian t.o.e. on zen odo
And when it comes to high criticism of my Apollonian theory, people love to demand perfect exact solutions for complex systems. But mainstream quantum mechanics itself only has an exact analytical solution for the two-body problem — the hydrogen atom. The moment you go to the three-body problem or higher, they have no exact solution either. They immediately switch to approximations and numerical methods. So they're demanding from my theory something their own framework has never achieved.
drug/heat projection "problem":
The classical objection against all push gravity theories has always been the so-called 'heat problem' — the claim that the constant influx of particles would rapidly overheat and vaporize all matter. This objection is invalid for several fundamental reasons. First, the incoming flux does not transfer its energy as random thermal motion (heat). Instead, it creates an organized, directional structural compression of matter along the line of sight. Second, this compression affects the lattice and measuring instruments themselves rather than increasing the kinetic energy of atoms. Third, the process is extremely efficient — the vast majority of the flux passes through matter with minimal interaction, and only the net imbalance produces the gravitational effect. These mechanisms completely eliminate the heating problem that was used to dismiss earlier models like Le Sage’s.
"Why Defending Ensteins Magical Pull Gravity Is Actually Hilarious"
It is actually hilarious how hard some people still defend the official magical "pull" gravity.
The push gravity side supposedly had one major historical criticism: the heating and drag problem. They said if space is filled with particles pushing everything, then objects should heat up massively and experience drag that slows them down. But that problem has now been very well addressed by modern researchers with better models using high-speed particles, elastic collisions, and proper shielding mechanisms.
And here's the kicker — we actually see enormous amounts of heat exactly where the critics said we shouldn't. The Sun is a giant ball of plasma and heat. Black holes have accretion disks reaching millions of degrees. The universe is filled with high-energy radiation. So the same people screaming about "too much heat" are now looking at a universe that's literally burning hot in many places.
Meanwhile, on the official magical pull side, the problems are endless. Here's just some of them:
They still can't explain what gravity actually is — it just magically pulls
GR was retrofitted to explain the anomalous perihelion precession of Mercury. What it actually calculates is the observable effects we see — light bending, gravitational redshift, and clocks appearing to run slower in gravity.
Instead of admitting that the "constants" were not actually constant, Einstein chose to bend space and time.
All theories will be retrofitted. No theory will ever EVER be not retrofitted. The real question is whether it actually delivers on everything we observe — and GR clearly doesn’t.
Complete failure to unify gravity with quantum mechanics after 100 years
why it’s not 2, 4, 10, or 26 dimensions.
The invention of dark matter
The invention of dark energy
The cosmological constant problem — worst prediction in science history
The Hubble tension
Galaxy rotation curves that don’t match predictions
The axis of evil in the CMB
Black hole singularity problem
Big Bang singularity problem
Black hole information paradox
The horizon problem
The flatness problem
The hierarchy problem
Origin of neutrino mass
Why gravity is 10^40 times weaker than electromagnetism
The vacuum catastrophe
Proton radius puzzle
The flyby anomaly
The arrow of time problem
Quantum measurement problem in gravity
No explanation for cosmic inflation’s inflaton field
The lithium problem in Big Bang nucleosynthesis
Missing monopoles
The coincidence problem
The nature of dark flow
Quasar alignment anomalies
The KBC void problem
No explanation for how quantum entanglement works with gravity
The muon g-2 anomaly
The neutron lifetime puzzle
The proton spin crisis
Ultra-high energy cosmic rays origin
The source of fast radio bursts
The missing baryon problem
The cuspy halo problem in galaxies
The too-big-to-fail problem
The satellite plane problem
The final parsec problem for supermassive black holes
The lack of observed white dwarf supernovae progenitors
The origin of magnetic fields in the universe
The cosmic ray knee problem
The greisen-zatsepin-kuzmin limit violation
The nature of time itself
The measurement problem in quantum mechanics
Why the universe has three spatial dimensions
The black hole firewall paradox
The trans-Planckian problem in inflation
The graceful exit problem in old inflation models
The moduli problem in string theory
The landscape problem in string theory
The Boltzmann brain problem
The faint young sun paradox
The solar corona heating mystery
The unexpected smoothness of the early universe
The lack of predicted supersymmetric particles
The strong force CP violation problem
The baryon asymmetry problem
The vacuum energy discrepancy
The origin of cosmic rays above the GZK cutoff
The source of ultra-high energy neutrinos
The Pioneer anomaly
The unexpected tilt of the solar system
The galaxy missing satellite problem
The void size problem in large scale structure
The cold spot anomaly in the CMB
The hemispherical asymmetry in the CMB
The lack of observed primordial gravitational waves
The origin of supermassive black holes in the early universe
The black hole entropy problem
The information loss paradox in evaporating black holes
The AdS/CFT correspondence limitations
The ER=EPR conjecture status
The origin of the universe’s low entropy state
The why-now problem
The KFC Ukraine problem — where even after getting blown up and destroyed, they pop back up and rebuild faster than the official theory can patch its own holes. (lol)
And dozens more unexplained issues that the push gravity path does not even create in the first place or gives a clear answer for.
and don't let me start with Halton arp:
Pretty much all of Halton Arp’s core points were never properly addressed — they were mostly ignored, dismissed, or explained away with weak excuses.His strongest observations, like the luminous bridge between NGC 4319 and Markarian 205, the statistical excess of quasars around active galaxies, discordant redshifts in physically connected objects, redshift quantization, and the “Fingers of God” effect in clusters, were never convincingly refuted. Mainstream cosmology just kept repeating “it’s coincidence” or “the bridge isn’t real” even when the evidence was sitting there in their own images.They never dealt with the actual data head-on. They just protected the redshift = distance assumption at all costs. So basically, his key points remain unaddressed to this day.
So to summarize: The push side had one old criticism that's now been properly addressed, while the official magical pull side is buried under a mountain of 50+ fundamental problems and inventions. Yet they still act like their theory is rock solid.
Make it make sense or get lost list.
Dr. Henry Lindner’s Flowing Space theory
Mike McCulloch Quantised Inertia
Tom Van Flandern — Pushing Gravity / Le Sage model
John Kierein — Radiation shadow / push gravity
Panagiotis Dalianos & Pier Franco Nali — Lesagian Gravity Redux
Gerasimos Danilatos — Push Gravity
Vijay Vishwakarma — Flux-Shadow Gravity
Shareef Ali Rashada — Graviton Pressure Theory
Dmitrii Osenilo — The Hydrodynamic Model of Gravity
Conrad Ranzan — Dynamic Aether Theory
Ors Marton — Space as an Ether Crystal
Sumeru Ray — Ray Unified Gravity Theory
Günther Kletetschka — Three-Dimensional Time Theory
James Johan Sebastian Allen — Pattern Field Theory
Steven Lizarazo — Alignment Framework
Vitor M.I. Nogueira — Dynamic Theory of the Aether
Richard J. Benish — Space Generation Model
Hamid Naghieh — Relational Origin of Gravity
Ron Garret - quantum conspiracy
and above all me with the Apollonian t.o.e. on zen odo
And when it comes to high criticism of my Apollonian theory, people love to demand perfect exact solutions for complex systems. But mainstream quantum mechanics itself only has an exact analytical solution for the two-body problem — the hydrogen atom. The moment you go to the three-body problem or higher, they have no exact solution either. They immediately switch to approximations and numerical methods. So they're demanding from my theory something their own framework has never achieved.
drug/heat projection "problem":
The classical objection against all push gravity theories has always been the so-called 'heat problem' — the claim that the constant influx of particles would rapidly overheat and vaporize all matter. This objection is invalid for several fundamental reasons. First, the incoming flux does not transfer its energy as random thermal motion (heat). Instead, it creates an organized, directional structural compression of matter along the line of sight. Second, this compression affects the lattice and measuring instruments themselves rather than increasing the kinetic energy of atoms. Third, the process is extremely efficient — the vast majority of the flux passes through matter with minimal interaction, and only the net imbalance produces the gravitational effect. These mechanisms completely eliminate the heating problem that was used to dismiss earlier models like Le Sage’s.
@1traphistory 9 days ago
Simple minded people crying about AI… either get the information or don’t. Everyone doesn’t have time and/or resources to studio record content
15 Horrifying Things Scientists Found In Space
Mr Space Explainer
104,010 views
From Hoag's Object and the Boomerang Nebula to Tabby's Star, the Great Attractor, mysterious cosmic signals, vanished stars, and gravitational waves, these are 15 of the most horrifying and unexplained discoveries scientists have found in space.
Some have explanations. Others remain genuine mysteries.
Meanwhile on Earth a combination of elements forming carbon based compounds , who through billions of years of evolution, are trying to make sense of it all.
It’s all rather impressive isn’t it?