Can science actually rule out the resurrection of Jesus?
In this debate, atheist Oxford chemist Peter Atkins argues that the resurrection never happened and that science gives us reason to reject it. Christian mathematician John Lennox pushes back, arguing that the laws of nature describe what normally happens but do not, by themselves, settle the question of whether God could act in history.
Then the discussion takes an unexpected turn when Atkins is asked what evidence could ever change his mind.
In this episode, The Christian Take follows the argument from miracles and evidence to a deeper question: what are we actually willing to count as evidence?
The original material comes from the Unbelievable? live debate “Can Science Explain Everything?”, featuring John Lennox and Peter Atkins at the University of Southampton and moderated by Justin Brierley.
Original video:
Lennox vs Atkins | Can science explain eve...
Can science actually rule out the resurrection of Jesus?
In this debate, atheist Oxford chemist Peter Atkins argues that the resurrection never happened and that science gives us reason to reject it. Christian mathematician John Lennox pushes back, arguing that the laws of nature describe what normally happens but do not, by themselves, settle the question of whether God could act in history.
Then the discussion takes an unexpected turn when Atkins is asked what evidence could ever change his mind.
In this episode, The Christian Take follows the argument from miracles and evidence to a deeper question: what are we actually willing to count as evidence?
The original material comes from the Unbelievable? live debate “Can Science Explain Everything?”, featuring John Lennox and Peter Atkins at the University of Southampton and moderated by Justin Brierley.
Original video:
Lennox vs Atkins | Can science explain eve...
👉 Grab your ebook here: https://the-atheist-code.netlify.app
The Atheist's Code — learn the pattern behind every objection, and never freeze again.
And if you're the atheist in this comment section: it was written for you too. Read the strongest version of what you've been arguing against.