The data he quotes is literally saying that women are too picky.

Statistician here.  Problem with his critique of the statistics are he only criticized one reference on the studies done and didn’t explain why or if 600 is inefficient as a population sample.  The biggest problem is he didn’t discuss the repeatable results of the data.  It’s easy to criticize one study that shows something if it’s repeated and domestically show the same or similar result.  Problem is the results of the dating apps have been repeatable many times so it’s not a galaxy of using one study to create a narrative.  He has many many problems but too long for me to type out.

Dude just said he disagreed with peoples assumptions, presented a bunch of data without really deriving anything to back up his opinions from it, then said yup, just as I thought!
I can see why he said his only skill was charisma, because the best part about the video was his presentation.

It is funny that he clearly has an agenda from the beginning, admits that he can't do data extraction and analysis, cherry picks bad data from more than a decade ago to criticize it, makes up random numbers to justify his point of view, and also admits that he is bad with statistics. Finally gets somewhat more reliable data, the data basically confirms the general current discourse which he has had an agenda against, then he just throws the analysis of the data and any meaning that can be extracted from it to the public in a "what do you think, guys?" kind of way, and then he returns to his biased point of view that there are no structural imbalances between the sexes, that the reason for that cannot be specifically atributted to one sex or another, that it is all the online match making sites fault and that if it weren't for them everyone would be holding hands and singing the Kumbaya... Completely ignoring that people also do in fact try to find relationships offline and there is no data available to testify that those are being more sucessfull, or less imbalanced, in any way. And all that while completely ignoring the somewhat more reliable data that he got... If he is going to do that from the beguinning, why care about hard data in the first place?

Dude: the popular opinion is wrong and i got the actual data to prove it!
Also dude: uses said data to completely disprove his own delusions while still not realizing he's wrong

Dude:I'm not a datascientist

yeah bro you very obviously do not understand what these datapoints in correlation to each otherreally mean

Yep, the stats are about as miserable as I expected them to be.

Dating apps are elephant graveyard of male self confidence.
Dating apps are where male self confidence goes to die.

I'm a male and I consider myself to look at least average. The dating apps I used made me feel ugly and unwanted. Do yourself a favor and avoid dating apps.

And then people are shocked at the male sewer slide rate

Dating apps suck

I'd love to go out and meet someone organically. But there's a higher likelihood of getting a false allegation than there is of meeting someone nice.

Spent several years on dating apps. Never matched, never got responses to messages. I got a few messages, mostly from bots or the absolute bottom of the barrel (overweight black women, single mothers). I definitely took it as me being the problem, because even among other low-value men, my experience was worse by orders of magnitude.

I'm much happier without being reminded of my own lack of value all the time, and I have exactly the same odds of finding a woman whether I'm actively trying to meet them or actively avoiding them entirely, so I no longer use dating apps.

With the average you have to remember the top men get nearly all the swipes, not even close to average.

So......why are all the men relegated to the dating websites?...who made it hostile to meet women out in the world?...

My friends friend has a problem with dating apps and he is dating a woman close to her 40s, and he is 25

13:16 Incel means for some reason you think you cannot find a partner, even though you desire it. It is not an ideology.
28:00 If you get rid of all the catfishes, you end up with an even smaller pool.

0:14 you like him now, but just wait till he starts asking for his precious

I get the feeling that a lot of negativity towards women in this situation comes from a reaction to women being raised to hate men and view us as useless by the later stages of feminism after the 'equality' was achieved.

When you look at the bigger picture, feminism has by design taken away a man's sense of purpose in society as much as technology has.

Women have specific biological capabilities that bestow them with inherent value at the most basic level of humanity, a man on the other hand derived his value from providing for his wife, family and the community in order to make life good for his family.

Technological advancement is definitely the most integral factor in this but women entering the workforce en masse have not helped the social structure of civilization.

The biggest question I have is why are people so hell bent on changing the core of human civilization, which has been giving a man a reason to care about society.

Interesting thing I don't think was covered very well with the superlikes:
The people using the most superlikes were shown to have a smaller chance of getting matches.
That's not because they used the superlikes though, obviously.
People who get less than average matches are just more likely to waste their money on superlikes.
Therefore the top 10% of superlike users are probably also in the bottom 10% of matches to begin with...
People who get a fair amount of matches don't resort to superlikes...

Starts the video claiming the okcupid blog was debunked. Ends providing stats from Tinder that prove the old blog was right. Doesn't realize he's contradicted himself.

Unrelated to that he has off-putting feminine mannerisms and made every excuse to blame men for why dating apps suck