Use my code for 10% off your next SeatGeek order*: https://seatgeek.onelink.me/RrnK/SWIF... Sponsored by SeatGeek. *Restrictions apply. Max $25 discount
TAYLOR AND TRAVIS ARE MARRIED!!! WE CHEERED!!! However, no one is acting normal about this...evenThe New York Times published an op-ed calling Taylor Swift's wedding a feminist backslide. It was wrong. Not in a "different interpretation" way. Wrong in a "they didn't listen to the albums" way.
Taylor Swift has been writing about getting married since she was sixteen. "Mary's Song." "Love Story." "Lover." "So Long, London." "The Prophecy." Every single era, same fixation — the only thing that changed was the guy.
So when this discourse started, I had to respond. Her marriage is NOT a plot twist. This is the ending she wrote for herself in 2006.We're going through the entire discography. Every album. Every lyric. The proof was always there.
Don't be a stranger!
📸 INSTAGRAM: Instagram: theswiftologist
📹 TIKTOK: TikTok: theeswiftologist
💰 PATREON: Patreon: swiftologist
🎙️ MY TAYLOR SWIFT PODCAST: https://open.spotify.com/show/70xT4aA...
📸 PODCAST INSTAGRAM: Instagram: evolutionofasnake
💌 EMAIL: swiftologistteam@wmeagency.com
0:00 - The most predictable plot twist of all time
1:09 - The New York Times op-ed that needs to be prosecuted
3:44 - 🎟️ SeatGeek, diva!
5:05 - Reading the op-ed so you don't have to
11:26 - The "feminist backslide" argument, dismantled
13:16 - The trad wife allegation doesn't hold up
19:49 - Era by era: she has always wanted this
22:51 - Red through 1989: she's writing wedding vows
26:25 - Reputation through Lover: she literally said "marry me"
29:38 - What "Lavender Haze" actually means
30:42 - TTPD exists because she wanted to get married
34:49 - CASE CLOSED
Use my code for 10% off your next SeatGeek order*: https://seatgeek.onelink.me/RrnK/SWIF... Sponsored by SeatGeek. *Restrictions apply. Max $25 discount
TAYLOR AND TRAVIS ARE MARRIED!!! WE CHEERED!!! However, no one is acting normal about this...evenThe New York Times published an op-ed calling Taylor Swift's wedding a feminist backslide. It was wrong. Not in a "different interpretation" way. Wrong in a "they didn't listen to the albums" way.
Taylor Swift has been writing about getting married since she was sixteen. "Mary's Song." "Love Story." "Lover." "So Long, London." "The Prophecy." Every single era, same fixation — the only thing that changed was the guy.
So when this discourse started, I had to respond. Her marriage is NOT a plot twist. This is the ending she wrote for herself in 2006.We're going through the entire discography. Every album. Every lyric. The proof was always there.
Don't be a stranger!
📸 INSTAGRAM: Instagram: theswiftologist
📹 TIKTOK: TikTok: theeswiftologist
💰 PATREON: Patreon: swiftologist
🎙️ MY TAYLOR SWIFT PODCAST: https://open.spotify.com/show/70xT4aA...
📸 PODCAST INSTAGRAM: Instagram: evolutionofasnake
💌 EMAIL: swiftologistteam@wmeagency.com
0:00 - The most predictable plot twist of all time
1:09 - The New York Times op-ed that needs to be prosecuted
3:44 - 🎟️ SeatGeek, diva!
5:05 - Reading the op-ed so you don't have to
11:26 - The "feminist backslide" argument, dismantled
13:16 - The trad wife allegation doesn't hold up
19:49 - Era by era: she has always wanted this
22:51 - Red through 1989: she's writing wedding vows
26:25 - Reputation through Lover: she literally said "marry me"
29:38 - What "Lavender Haze" actually means
30:42 - TTPD exists because she wanted to get married
34:49 - CASE CLOSED