Hey everyone, here are a few notes:
Yes, the language is Turing complete
Yes, the sets being ordered technically makes them lists, not sets
Thanks to everyone who pointed out that the > at 0:57 is pointing the wrong way. You can now stop doing that.
The language definitely could be streamlined a bit more, I might make a follow-up video at some point which uses fewer than 10 words.

You can cut two more words from your vocabulary by dropping And, Not and Or and replacing them with a single Nand operator. Nand by itself is enough to define all possible boolean operations.

Bro is NOT allowed within a 500 feet radius around a language education facility

When your conlang first necessitates the translation of the mathematical axioms in order to invent nouns

dude leaked the source code of the universe

If magic were real, this would probably be the kind of language you'd have to write spells in. It'd be like having a terminal for the universe, where you can write commands to move specific particles in a certain location to another location at a specified time.  But actually typing out a command/"spell", especially one that does something useful, would take an obscenely long amount of time.

When your colang is secretly naive set theory and functional programming in a trenchcoat

To be able to even construct the word "I" would take millennia

> set of all things
haha you fool.  you've fallen into my trap.  activate RUSSELL'S PARADOX

"Bilutabowase"
My guess for how it's written out:
(AO)ES
Which would (roughly) translate to "All things are in this set"

I was gonna ask why Bilutabowase doesn't have verbs, but then I realized that if you accurately described a system on the atomic level its behaviour would be completely deterministic and therefore implicit! Great work my man

this is exactly the intersection of conlangs and esolangs absolutely noone asked for. I love it

Imagine your 923482452 page answer to a 917923 universe math question is incorrect because you accidentally used 5 words incorrectly completely changing the answer

When Gödel created the proof for his incompleteness theorem, he could have never imagined this

Now translate the video script into this

I think we might need to add a new item to the list of Crimes Against Humanity.

This conlang solves problems. Not problems like what is "beauty." Because that would fall within the purview of your conundrums of philosophy, and this conlang wasn't designed with that in mind. It solves practical problems. For instance: how am I going to stop some mean mother hubbard from tearing them a structurally superfluous be-hind? The answer: define "gun." And if that don't work, define "more gun..." Take for instance defining a "heavy caliber tripod mounted lil' old number" designed by me, built by me, and you best hope... Not pointed at you. All of that is possible to define with this conlang.

i think this points out something really interesting about language. you didn't really make your language shorter. what you did was you distilled relationships between objects into a few core ideas. but the outcome was that your language was astronomically long. being able to define custom functions is basically just a cheat to define new words. without calling them words

the garlic bread and ace of spades joke took me off guard not gonna lie

lowest% language speedrun world record