It is genuinely unsettling to realize that physicists have formulated a theorem proving we may have to abandon the "absoluteness of observed events". This implies that when something happens, it might not happen universally for everyone! Which interpretation from the quantum "menu" of sacrifices makes the most sense to you? Let me know your thoughts down below! 👇 And if you enjoy questioning the fundamental fabric of reality, make sure to subscribe.

My name is Marco Biagini and I am a physicist. I would like to explain how to understand quantum physics and how all its illogical and strange features disappear when viewed from the correct perspective; the problem is that most physicists reject this view for ideological (and NOT scientific or rational ) reasons.
In quantum mechanics the state of a physical system is described by a “wave function” and does not have defined values ​​for all the physical quantities measurable on it; the wave function  only provides probabilities for the infinite possible outcomes we might observe.  
Once the measurement has been carried out, the system will have a defined value of the measured quantity, and this involves a sudden and radical modification of its wave function; in fact the wave function generally describes infinite possibilities while for an event to take place, it is necessary that the wave function assigns a probability of 100% to a single possibility and 0% probability to all the others. If all other results are not eliminated by imposing this radical modification "by hand" on the wave function, the predictions of subsequent measurements on the same system will be wrong. The transition between a state that describes many possibilities to a state that describes only one possibility is called “collapse of the wave function”.

The collapse is problematic because it is not described by the fundamental equation of quantum mechanics, the Schrödinger equation. It is an external imposition, a violation of the known laws governing quantum systems.In fact, the time evolution of the wave function is determined by Schrödinger's equation, but this equation never determines the collapse of the wave function, which instead is imposed by the physicist "by hand". Since the collapse represents a violation of the Schrödinger equation,  the cause of the collapse is attributable only to an agent not described by the Schrödinger equation itself.  The open problem in  quantum physics is that the cause of the transition between the indeterminate state and the determined state, cannot be traced back to any physical interaction, because all known physical interactions are already included in the Schrödinger's equation. In fact,  since the collapse is a violation of the laws of physics expressed through the Schrodinger's equation,  the cause of the collapse cannot be determined by the same laws of physics; in particular, it cannot be determined by the interactions already included in the Schrodinger's equation.

After one century of debates, the collapse still represents the crucial problem for all interpretations of quantum mechanics. On the one hand it represents a violation of the Schrodinger equation, which represents the fundamental laws governing atomic and molecular processes. On the other hand, it is necessary for the laws of quantum physics to make sense, and to be applied in the interpretation and prediction of the phenomena we observe. Indeed, since the wave function represents infinite possibilities, without the collapse there would be no event; for there to be an event, then there must be one possibility that is actualized by canceling all other possibilities.

Quantum mechanics does not describe reality as something that exists objectively at every instant, but as a collection of events isolated in time (i.e. the phenomena we observe at the very moment in which we observe them), while among these events there are only infinite possibilities. In other words, there is no continuity between events; reality is not described as a continuous flow of events but as a series of discrete events. In fact, the properties of a physical system are determined only after the collapse of the wave function; when the properties of the system are not yet determined, the system is not real, but only an idea, a hypothesis. Only when collapse occurs do properties become real because they take on a definite value.  It makes no sense to assume that the system exists but its properties are indeterminate, because properties are an intrinsic aspect of the system itself; for example, there can be no triangle with indeterminate sides and no circle with indeterminate radius. People often say that a quantum particle is in many places at the same time but this is just a wrong and absurd interpretation since it implies logical contradictions; a non-collapsed wave function describes infinite possibilities and not a particle that occupies infinite positions at the same time. If the  properties are indeterminate it means that such properties do not exist which implies that the system itself does not exist. Actually photons, electrons and quantum particles in general are just the name we give to some mathematical equations that describe infinite possibilities. The collapse represents the transition from infinite hypothetical possibilities to an actual event.

Quantum mechanics is incompatible with realism because realism assumes the continuity of physical objects independent of their observation or measurement. Since the collapse of the wave function violates the Schrödinger equation, the collapse can only be associated with an agent that is not described by the Schrödinger equation. Therefore no measuring device can cause the collapse since any measuring device, as well as their interactions, is described by the Schrödinger equation. The discontinuous existence of physical properties and the irreducibility of collapse to the interactions described by the Schrödinger equation represent insurmountable obstacles against which every attempt to reconcile quantum physics with realism is shattered; this is the reason why Einstein never accepted quantum mechanics.  The only event we know of that is irreducible to the Schrödinger equation is consciousness (on my youtube channel you can find a video with detailed explanations on the irreducibility of consciousness to physical processes). Therefore, actual events can only exist when consciousness is involved in the process.

However, the fact that properties exist only when a conscious mind observes the system in no way implies that it is the observer or his mind that creates those properties and causes the collapse; I regard this hypothesis as totally unreasonable. The point is that there must be a correlation between the existence of an event and the interaction with a non-physical agent (the human mind); however, correlation does not mean causation because the concomitance of two events does not imply a causal link.

In contrast to realism, idealism provides a logically coherent interpretation of quantum physics and bypasses the need for a physical mechanism for the collapse. In fact, no cause is necessary for the collapse in an idealistic perspective, which assumes that there is no mind-independent physical reality and that physical reality only exists as a concept in the mind of God, who directly creates  in our mind the phenomena we observe (any observed phenomenon is a mental experience); in other words, the universe is like a collective and interactive dream created by God in our mind. In this view, the collapse of the wave function is not a physical process but is a mere representation of the act of creation of the observed phenomenon, an act that God performs directly in our mind; the collapse is only one element of the cognitive model we use to synthetically and quantitatively describe the phenomena we observe. This is essentially the view of the philosopher George Berkeley, and in this view God is not only the Creator, but also the Sustainer of the universe.  
Quantum physics has shown that all possible descriptions of a hypothetical underlying physical reality are incompatible with experimental data. Therefore, idealism is the most rational approach. In fact, if one assumes that there is an underlying reality independent of the mind, one must explain why this reality is indescribable and inconceivable but at the same time accurately predictable through mathematical models conceived by the human mind. The assumption of the existence of an underlying physical reality is totally useless and is not supported by any rational or empirical evidence. What we know is that our perceptions of what appears to be something external to our mind, exist and such perceptions are mental experiences. Therefore the most rational approach is Berkeley's idea that our perceptions are created directly by God in our mind and that the laws of physics are a good representation of the rational framework used by God to create such perceptions. Berkeleyan idealism is a strongly parsimonious view, because it simultaneously provides an explanation of both the existence of mental experience and the effectiveness of mathematics in predicting natural phenomena. In fact, science has shown that some mathematical models (what we call "laws of physics") are very effective in predicting what we observe in nature, even though they are a pure construction of the human mind and do not describe any underlying physical reality. Idealism also provides an explanation for the existence of correlations between brain processes and mental experiences without implying a cause-effect relationship; in fact, brain processes are considered simply a representation of mental processes. Furthermore, Berkeleyan idealism explains the discontinuous existence of physical properties, which is a peculiar feature of quantum mechanics; in fact the idealistic view presupposes that what we call "universe" is only the set of our sensory perceptions and that the idea that an external physical reality exists independently of the mind is only the product of our imagination.

Loved this content! I especially appreciated the overview of physicists’ actual thinking. I am always curious in these types of videos when things are characterized as terrifying, just because they are mysterious. Life is an absolute mystery; everything about it that is important, like consciousness and love, are complete unknowns as far as the scientific method is concerned. To a Buddhist or Hindu, these are not some sort of existential problem, just the infinite nature of Creation. As you state, the universe is under no obligation to be comprehensible to us. It is only the scared ego thought system that demands understanding, pretending this is some sort of control over what is seeminglyinfinite and eternal.

how can one be scared of something you cannot physically see, the Quantum?

People don't want to say Einstein-Dirac were wrong... !!! These humpty-Dumpty set limitations so that they dont want anyone go beyond...

If I am living in a simulation,it is a good one.

17:30ish. So... we're all doing this in a shared perception or it's just us?

The Quantum Theory is fascinating and terryfing contemporary, for me, for two main reasons:
1) all of us we made from the same fundamental "Materia/Energy", but we have perceptions, creativity,  thougts,  fantasy, feelings and so on spreading on the enormous variety of level, form, and many others manifestations in the our "real" life. How and why It exists these differences?
These differences have its origin at intermediate after molecular/ mesoscopic interrelations level? No answer!
2)  A perharps somewhat
" cynical" interpretation: quantum fields seem to be a substitute for an Universal Creator or God.  It follows that after death-  since our fundamental components are scattered throughout an Infinite, Atemporal Universe, we leave without Heaven, Hell or something else  of this type, but merely as dispersed Energy - Free Will, personal volition, and Moral Laws cease to exist: the Nietzsche " God Death". What would It matter "to me" to lead a "proper"social life if, after my death, there is nothing but Energy -scattered I don't know where, and perharps for eternity?
Mighty the quantum theory be a new type of NIHILISM? If It is possible probabilistic everithing, mighty possible anything.

The only question is what is the manifestig power

РЕАЛЬНІСТЬ ЦЕ НЕ ТЕ ЩО МИ БАЧИМО! У НАС ОБМЕЖЕНА НЕ ЛИШЕ ФУНКЦІЯ БАЧИТИ СПЕКТР ВСЬОГО СВІТЛА А І АНАЛІЗУВАТИ ГОЛОГРАМУ ВСЕСВІТУ. МИ ДОЛЖНИ ПРИЙНЯТЬ, ЧТО НЕ СПОСОБНИ ЗНАТЬ ВСЮ ФІЗИКУ ВСЕСВІТУ А ЛИШ ЇЇ ЧАСТИНУ.

Atomic  prison ..    😅     ... Starlight in the night sky  and  A sea of Starlight from the Milky Way .. !

The universe is a reaction, and as this reaction happens, it reacts to its own edges. The leading edge of the reaction cycle is positive, and the trailing edge is negative. These attract because they are reacting to motion against no motion, at the basest level, they are two sides of the same coin. If you split the negative and positive, you get a magnetic field.The reaction attracts more reaction at each conceivable point, wanting to intersect and combine to form neutral boundaries. These intersection points have a fundamental minimum size. The reaction captures points where it isn't, and this is the encapsulation of the void.The reaction and the void are in a perpetual battle. The Big Bang was the void winning, and the reaction is timeless because 0D and 3D are inherently unstable, that conflict is what starts the reaction. Entropy is simply the tendency of the reaction to gradually reclaim, process, and dissipate the void at its boundaries.Encapsulation, Mass, and ChargeMatter is the void, or the lack of reaction, encapsulated. Its charge is applied depending on the geometry and conditions of that encapsulation, specifically, which direction and which side. One direction is matter, and the opposite direction is antimatter. This is why opposite charges annihilate; they have opposite reactions that want to intersect and neutralize. Like charges repel because they compress their influence on the reaction outside the object, creating a buffer that prevents collapse. Encapsulation is the mechanism, and charge is simply whether its directionality is negative positive or positive negative.At the atomic level, a proton displaces the reaction. Because of its encapsulation, it creates a neutral indentation, a safe harbor protected from the outside, where a neutron can nest. Neutrons don't last long on their own because they only have a weak, neutral encapsulation. The proton also dictates the orientation and cloud of the electron. When an electron leaves its band, it leaves a gap with a charge imbalance. This pulses the reaction, pulling it to neutralize the negative indentation left Light, Photons, and EntanglementA photon is different from matter. It is the reaction totally saturated and encapsulated. It has no mass because there is no void inside it. Einstein’s math points to singularities having no dimensions, but in reality, the baseline flicker, the natural refresh rate and handovers of the reaction, is what provides dimensions. Because a photon is saturated reaction, there is no flicker inside it, meaning it has no internal dimensions.This explains quantum entanglement: if there is no internal flicker or dimension, entangled particles are essentially occupying the exact same point at the time of entanglement.The speed of light ($E=mc^2$) is traversal through this grid of minimum intersection points. Energy displaces the reaction, creating mass, and light is the traversal over this grid at its natural refresh rate. Because light experiences no handover pressure, its speed through the minimum intersection flicker is always the same. This baseline distance and speed of reaction is what all the laws of nature are relative to. Photons travel as waves because they depart relative to the geometry of their encapsulation, carrying the length of the total energy band they are leaving to neutralize a gap.Gravity, Time, and Black HolesGravity is the displacement of the reaction. Time is the act of crossing handovers. Regardless of displacement, the grid always has a minimum intersection size.When you have massive displacement, like matter, more reaction must exist in that space to encapsulate the void. Because there is more reaction happening, the flicker density increases. Crossing through this denser area means crossing more handovers, this is what we experience as time dilation.Gravity pulls objects because the encapsulated void is attracted to the denser reaction. The reaction is attempting to balance itself and stamp out the void, so gravity is essentially displacement attracting more encapsulations.In a black hole, space time, the reaction, has been totally warped and saturated. Light can't escape a black hole, and gravitational lensing happens, because light has no mass, so no void pressure on its encapsulation. It simply follows the relative density and indentation of the encapsulation. It wants to stay on its path, but the path itself bends around the extreme displacement.Dark Matter, Spin, and Quantum MechanicsThis framework explains cluster dynamics and increased lensing without needing dark matter. If mass doesn't directly bend light, but rather light follows the displacement indentation of the reaction, then lensing anomalies are just areas of increased or decreased reaction density. These could be artifacts of Big Bang inflation causing a difference in reaction density, bending light without the need for extra invisible mass.Spin values occur because the encapsulation mechanism is deeply reactive and affected by measurement. It has double boundaries, the moving encapsulation mechanism and the captured void moving relative to everything else. A photon, being just encapsulated reaction, only has one boundary, which is why its spin behaves differently.Quantum tunneling happens because the void inherently lacks dimensions, making its encapsulation variable. It can squeeze through objects proportionally to the flicker and the minimum intersection distance.Radioactive decay is proportional to half over its time handovers; encapsulation breaking down is the mechanism of decay. Heat and thermal radiation occur when movement and collisions speed up the wavelength of emitted light, causing infrared emission.Finally, the Higgs boson is pure geometry encapsulated. It has no standard values because it is the reaction encapsulated perfectly at rest. Everything else is balanced out until a strike happens.

encapsulation and that is why glueons are attracted to each quark evcenally because the reaciton is being displaced and warped and that is why hardronisation happens as you pull a quark away there is still the effect of the other quark since its repelling and attracting each part evenally so it leaves a neq void and its easly encapsulated by the reaction its why the glueon is equally attracted

the 3 quarks balence the pressure because of the geometry and the glueon its warped and encapsulation happens no matter what because the quarks make quark sized holes at each point because of the others they are forcing the reaction into a configuration its just that configuraiton of 3 quarks and chromodynamics happens because its the reaction that is being forced into configurations and that forces netural intersectied glueons to a certan configuration i guess the shell could be seen as the result of the forcing of the configuration of the shell through geometry and encapsulation and forcing of the glueons so that influence must end somewhere and that is where the inner boundry comes from and the outergoundry which isnt forced its the impact of the forced boundry of the proton or neturon through the reaciton and how that interaction warps the reaction either way i have a good aawnser infact a excelent awnser to chromodynamics and the mass is still because of the boundry the inner one if encapsulation is pressure on the outside going in it stands to reason that its absloute displacment is still a boundry of displacment that isnt the reaction thats probally where the extra mass comes form that isnt quarks its from the reaction pusing on the inner boundry

"Violently incompatible." You sound like a divorce lawyer.

It's a shame that there is no Italian voice translation in the settings.

Definitely QIP Quantum Information Panpsichism theory by Federico Faggin is far ahead in exploring consciousness and reality.
And not terrifying at all

Já kreslím svoje vlastné kvantové Vlny skoky

Einstein has been disproved,..by...m

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉😂😂😂😂😂😂🎉🎉😢😮😅😅😊😊

Another wast of your time

QM classicalised in 2009. Nothing to see/ lear(n) here.