Many of the pictures presented in this video do not match the actual scenery where the Ark is located...

The problem with all the boats they may claim may be Noah's Ark is that the structure is shaped like a boat. The ark was never built in the shape of a boat that was meant to sail it was only meant to float. The building instructions in the Bible for  construction  of the ark was a rectangular  structure 3 stories high. It did not even resemble a boat it resembled and ark a rectangular box a very huge rectangular box
If you found a structure shaped like a boat it was definitely not Noah's ark. Consider this point. The Ark of the covenant. In this instance the Ark is also a container but holding the covenant given to Moses. Was this Ark shaped like a boat or dies the word ark signify a rectangular shape of various possible sizes. The word ark is understood as a container. Shaped as a rectangle. The ark of the covenant was not shaped like a small sailing boat in the shape of a boat

“For there is nothing hidden that will not be disclosed, and nothing concealed that will not be known or brought out into the open.”
LUKE 8:17

RON WYATT  FOUND THE NOAHS ARCH YEARS AGO GIVE HIM CREDITS  HIS SONS TOO

don't ya just love it when the caption and title of this video have nothing to do with the actual video?  Pisses me off..... isn't there any integrity left out there?

That’s how you talked for a half hour and say nothing

Even given the results of degredation and age does it really look possible that the object shown could carry 2 of every luving thing for forty days and nights plus at least 5 humans.

I was there, and I have photographs of dinosaur dung. there is also an inscription on the wall...Kilroy was here

Thank you using metric measurements, l understand exactly what your explaining. Feet and yards do my head in.

Scientific Bull...a cover up to discount God.  Be not deceived by these "decomposed biologic" explanations -- in the shape of the boat -- resting on Mt. Ararat....  How do you go inside what is only biological decompensation?  These photos presented do not match the site Ron Wyatt investigated and visited countless times.  Can we say "p-r-o-p-a-g-a-n-d-a???

Amen.

This wouldn’t prove with absolute certainty that it was Noah’s Ark, but it still would be one of the things to consider for the possibility that it is, that this video didn’t think was important enough to mention ; and that is, what would be the statistical odds that a mud slide would create the shape of a boat, with the same width and length dimensions, given in the Bible for Noah’s Ark, and if that wasn’t enough, include in the odds, for it to be mere coincidental happenstance, that the shape took place on the same mountain that the Bible says Noah’s Ark came to rest after the flood. In my opinion, to not consider that as part of the equation, someone would have to throw objective reasoning skills out the window.

Well the wood is think would have been used for other things things to travel and fire wood... a few generations

are we to believe people dragged large stones, obviously for use as "drogue" stones to balance a ship, with large cable ready holes on end of them were dragged up there and later manufactured to look like those found there? Religious carvings, such as crosses, put onto them, for many centuries, is just a supposition, not remembrances passed down through the millenia, centuries?

It's appalling that Ron Wyatt is completely disregarded simply because he didn't have the "educational degree" that some consider necessary, and to further criticize his part in this discovery because of his faith is outrageous. The criticisms leveled against this discovery completely disregard the rest of the finds, also, by locals who took a film crew in and showed clear proof of the hand hewn beams, the three levels, several separate pens where animals had been, and wooden pegs that had been driven into the beams. The evidence is compelling! Only snobs would disregard the obvious and suggest that "more educated" scientific research is required to accept this find!

All of this is a lot of hot air . Ron Wyatt has shown us

So they never went inside

So the story of Noah's ark could originate from an intelligent being observing such a geologic formation in the distant past, or several of them.

Based on the narrator's concluding remarks the answer to this video's topic of the validity of Noah's ark as being archaeological and geological FACT is still "on-going"; NOT SETTLED, that is logically then, best evaluated as in literary terms a "? [question mark]"! I conclude, in MY opinion and evaluation that Noah's ark IS historical, archaeological, and geological REALITY NOT MYTH, "TALE", LEGEND, or FABLE! The language of ancient, human civilizations, their writings and depictions "speak for themselves"; and to the literate observers that ARE CAPABLE of understanding the literary languages, and archaeological and geological terrestrial and subterranean depictions.