this research is really brilliant becaue any real student of history or archaeology knows that the turks are like any migrating force of people escaping either climatic or warring hardships. the turks are no different. they moved further west, to feed their herds, because of poor pastures, change in climate, another horse riding tribe was invading from the east and pushed them west - conquering and assimilating peoples as they went. the peoples of anatolia reflect this. invasion and shift how many turkish sultans and princes only half turkish themselves - their mothers being from regions of greece southern europe and the caucuses - the result of multiple wives of the palace harem. its the story of empire and assimilation.

I never liked the phrase "hidden Armenians" because that has such a negative connotation. I would call them "resurfaced" Armenians instead. They were not in hiding. They just presented themselves in certain way to survive. There are thousands of certain ethnic groups in North America who have adopted Anglo-Saxon names for various reasons. They still have and preserve their real names. Can we call them hidden too? Of course not. They live in hostile environments and that is how they survive.

Thank you all the angels of the multiverse. 🇦🇲

Congratulations that's a great job

I am sorry the translation to English is very bad does not make sense.

American historians Justin and Carolyn McCarthy:

"The modern territory of Armenia belongs not to Armenians, but to Azerbaijanis. This is the reason that most of the geographical names in the territory of Armenia belong to Azerbaijanis.