🚨 Arrested for Doing Nothing? One Line in PACE Makes It BACKFIRE on the Officer
Oliver Bennett
6,627 views
Get Make Them Pay here: https://knowrightsuk.gumroad.com/l/ma...
You're standing outside your own house and an officer has just said the words. You are under arrest. And you haven't done anything.
Maybe you rang them. Maybe it was your neighbour, or the other driver, or somebody who told a story first and loudest. Two people, one version each, and a man with four minutes to decide which of you he's looking at.
Here's what almost nobody knows about that moment. Suspecting you is not enough. It never has been. There's a second gate written into the same section of the same Act, and if he can't get through it, the arrest is unlawful however reasonable his suspicion was.
WHAT'S IN THIS VIDEO:
— Gate one: what section 24 gives an officer, and why it's a low bar on purpose
— Gate two: the word "But" that opens 24(4), and why grounds to suspect is not power to arrest
— The six reasons in 24(5) — and why the list being closed is the whole thing
— Code G 2.1, printed in the code his own force issued him: a lawful arrest requires two elements, and both must be satisfied
— Code G 2.4, and the alternatives sitting next to arrest: summons, charge by post, a penalty notice
— The Court of Appeal on an officer who gave no thought to the alternatives
— Section 28, and why "you know why" is not telling you
— The four lines to say, and the one thing that ruins them
Sources: PACE 1984 ss. 24 and 28 (legislation.gov.uk); PACE Code G 2012 (gov.uk); Hayes v Chief Constable of Merseyside Police [2011] EWCA Civ 911 (Find Case Law). Read in full, 1 Sept 2026.
⚠️ THE PART THAT MATTERS MORE THAN THE LAW
Nothing here is a reason to resist an arrest. Not one word of it.
If an arrest turns out to be unlawful, it stays unlawful all the way to a courtroom — and it doesn't become more unlawful because you pulled your arm away. What it becomes is complicated, because now there's a second question about you, and it's far easier to answer than the first.
No hand on anybody. No pulling away. No arguing on the pavement. Say the lines, get the answers or the silence, and go. Everything after that is paperwork — and paperwork is a fight you can win.
BEING STRAIGHT ABOUT THE SIX
An officer at a chaotic scene can often reach one of them honestly, and this isn't an argument that he can't. The point is that he has to, and somebody has to be able to say which one. That's a different question from whether he suspected you — and it's the one almost nobody asks.
England and Wales. Scotland and Northern Ireland run separate systems.
FREE HELP FIRST, ALWAYS
The duty solicitor is free at every police station, any hour, and is not means-tested. Ask before any interview and before you give any account of your evening.
Get the full handbook on stops, searches and what to say: https://knowrightsuk.gumroad.com/l/ma...
I'm a criminal-defence solicitor but not your solicitor, and nothing here is legal advice about your situation.
#knowyourrights #uklaw #police #ukrights
6 Comments
We have been intimidated by the police and we are looking for a lawyer to represent us on the “no win, no fee basis” but every solicitor is overwhelmed by the number of cases they have already.
I would be so grateful for any suggestions.
Thank you so much.
❤
2. they were the applicant by false accounts without evidence from them. She did nothing wrong. They were the perpetrators seeking transference.
3. The police stated false grounds and lied to her and was filmed on the victims cctv. She told them they have made a mistake and they wont have any evidence which was true, as she is not the person they have falsifed her as, which police saw, as they already knew this many times and the officers carrying out false arrest saw at that time by forcing their way into her temporary living situation which was a therapy room / art studio. They were disappointed and went about their planned abduction sooner than arranged and begun their torture in her grounds.
4. But, gross mis conduct without being allowed to be represented, signed her off her house deeds, in her own home after she had been refused and violated of all rights to exist and function in her home and even to enter it, whilst her spouse was comiting known adultry for the time this was happening. There was no court house and no jurisdiction. This was under consent order without divorce, in a remote non due process.
5. When sjgned off her house deeds there was no court order to vacate her home and she was legally a mother albeit her spouses and legal violation of rights. Her youngest son was age 14. A call to the family court verified no order had been made. Solicitors wouldnt have had anything to respond to they stated and advised her to become an applicant , make complaints , as she had been acheiving and was being blocked. They said keep trying. She did. A tribunal was active. Solicitors refused to represent as ptsd meant " lacking capacity to instruct " they advised and " conflict of interest " as she is homeopathic and was trained lay practioner and angelic therapist.
6. In the period that no court order or any warrant had been made , police arrested the estranged mother who lived in her therapy room / art room, as she was a publsihed angelic artist and photographer, as well as Taoist under malicious family court non due process. Links to pages were submitted to those involved in high public offices. Alan Mak was closely associated with one of the applicants in financial and political ways as well as those local higher up politicians associated with the one world order madates and totalitarianism in vaccinolgy and corrupt legal transferences.
7. Staying quiet would have ended in loss of life as a vanished person. Other evidence and sign posts already known to the victim before hand as well as this moment joined the dots. The bike tyre puncture that led to the phone call that led to the police sudden ambush after theyd been seen hiding behind the hedge, by witnesses, the victims phone lights up her position, police recieve the green light over their radio when the victim is outside of her locked door and inside of her garage aside from being illegally signed off her house deeds as the innocent for transference ( optics and legal fraud ), making her vulnerable and powerless wihout being allowed legal representation. Police ambush her, surround her. There was no signature, no agreement and substantial evidence submitted to stop it and reverse , submitted time and time again, escalated to a proving of false timelines and mal practices that never once gained her signature or agreement or recognised her spouses criminal and violent coercive control and tyrany that included addictions enabled and encouaged by family court sitting in private with a council leader as solicitor who held a role as council solicitor also. He was also a peer of her spouse and their peers and friends in a local business ring involving property, estate agents, antiques shop and other local businesses within a mile from the home of the victim and her estranged children and a few miles from the council offices where the sitting in private probate solicitor worked as council leader at the time. This was never disclosed by the family court and is not referenced on any document.
8. The victim was not receiving letters at her home address as she was prevented from living in it. Her spouse chose whether to allow her her letters or not. She didnt receive any. She had to enter the house to check. He usually got there as he worked a short walk away and ran as a hobby every day. He was usually inside the house waiting for mail. The family court and authorities knew this. They remained collaborative.
9. The victim was tortured and screamed very loudly that a neighbour ran into the vicinity and filmed them. Police saw them and dragged the victim running with her, losing her shoe on route, so they couldnt be filmed and caught in the act.
10. One officer was a ploy. They were a black transvestite very bulky male cross female charcater who was filmed causing injury to the victim from behind whilst the other 2 dragged her, running with her. She appeared like a rag doll at times and in a trance, due to extreme pain and shock. They continued to torture her, stole her phones and stripped her in the street after being caught out, by removing her spiritual clothing from her. This was to nuance her as theyd been caught. They infected her blood from injuries they inflicted by intent. They failed to wear gloves by intent to infect and cause damage to nerves which they did. The list goes on.
11. The list goes on.
12. No warrant , no grounds, no charges.
13. Scream for your life. Dont stay quiet.
14. Evil knows no boundaries.
STAR
🚨 Arrested for Doing Nothing? One Line in PACE Makes It BACKFIRE on the Officer
Oliver Bennett
6,627 views
Get Make Them Pay here: https://knowrightsuk.gumroad.com/l/ma...
You're standing outside your own house and an officer has just said the words. You are under arrest. And you haven't done anything.
Maybe you rang them. Maybe it was your neighbour, or the other driver, or somebody who told a story first and loudest. Two people, one version each, and a man with four minutes to decide which of you he's looking at.
Here's what almost nobody knows about that moment. Suspecting you is not enough. It never has been. There's a second gate written into the same section of the same Act, and if he can't get through it, the arrest is unlawful however reasonable his suspicion was.
WHAT'S IN THIS VIDEO:
— Gate one: what section 24 gives an officer, and why it's a low bar on purpose
— Gate two: the word "But" that opens 24(4), and why grounds to suspect is not power to arrest
— The six reasons in 24(5) — and why the list being closed is the whole thing
— Code G 2.1, printed in the code his own force issued him: a lawful arrest requires two elements, and both must be satisfied
— Code G 2.4, and the alternatives sitting next to arrest: summons, charge by post, a penalty notice
— The Court of Appeal on an officer who gave no thought to the alternatives
— Section 28, and why "you know why" is not telling you
— The four lines to say, and the one thing that ruins them
Sources: PACE 1984 ss. 24 and 28 (legislation.gov.uk); PACE Code G 2012 (gov.uk); Hayes v Chief Constable of Merseyside Police [2011] EWCA Civ 911 (Find Case Law). Read in full, 1 Sept 2026.
⚠️ THE PART THAT MATTERS MORE THAN THE LAW
Nothing here is a reason to resist an arrest. Not one word of it.
If an arrest turns out to be unlawful, it stays unlawful all the way to a courtroom — and it doesn't become more unlawful because you pulled your arm away. What it becomes is complicated, because now there's a second question about you, and it's far easier to answer than the first.
No hand on anybody. No pulling away. No arguing on the pavement. Say the lines, get the answers or the silence, and go. Everything after that is paperwork — and paperwork is a fight you can win.
BEING STRAIGHT ABOUT THE SIX
An officer at a chaotic scene can often reach one of them honestly, and this isn't an argument that he can't. The point is that he has to, and somebody has to be able to say which one. That's a different question from whether he suspected you — and it's the one almost nobody asks.
England and Wales. Scotland and Northern Ireland run separate systems.
FREE HELP FIRST, ALWAYS
The duty solicitor is free at every police station, any hour, and is not means-tested. Ask before any interview and before you give any account of your evening.
Get the full handbook on stops, searches and what to say: https://knowrightsuk.gumroad.com/l/ma...
I'm a criminal-defence solicitor but not your solicitor, and nothing here is legal advice about your situation.
#knowyourrights #uklaw #police #ukrights