In the winter of 1811-1812, three of the most powerful earthquakes in the recorded history of the contiguous United States struck the geological center of North America — twelve hundred miles from the nearest tectonic plate boundary, in a region where, by every model of plate tectonics, large earthquakes should not occur. The Mississippi River ran backward for several hours. Bells rang in Boston. Entire islands vanished overnight. A new lake formed in a single morning, drowning a cypress forest that still stands beneath the water today. This is the story of the New Madrid Seismic Zone — and the catastrophe the central United States chose not to remember.
CHAPTERS
00:00 The River Ran Backward
01:30 A Megaquake Where None Should Exist
03:28 December 16, 1811: The First Shock
05:25 Aftershocks and the Second Quake
07:05 The Ancient Reelfoot Rift
08:50 Bradbury, Brooks, and the Eyewitness Record
10:47 Tecumseh's Comet and Frontier Memory
13:03 Evidence of Earlier Earthquake Cycles
14:07 February 7, 1812: The Largest Shock
15:55 Reelfoot Lake Is Born
16:42 The Widest-Felt Quake in U.S. History
18:01 Collapse, Relief, and Forgotten Disaster
19:46 Modern Science Reopens the Case
21:19 Could It Happen Again?
22:07 The Risk to Modern America
PEER-REVIEWED SOURCES
Johnston, A.C. (1996). Seismic moment assessment of earthquakes in stable continental regions — III. New Madrid 1811–1812, Charleston 1886 and Lisbon 1755. Geophysical Journal International, 126(2), 314–344.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1...
Johnston, A.C., & Schweig, E.S. (1996). The enigma of the New Madrid earthquakes of 1811–1812. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 24, 339–384.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth...
Nuttli, O.W. (1973). The Mississippi Valley earthquakes of 1811 and 1812: Intensities, ground motion and magnitudes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 63(1), 227–248.
https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0630010227
Tuttle, M.P., Schweig, E.S., Sims, J.D., Lafferty, R.H., Wolf, L.W., & Haynes, M.L. (2002). The earthquake potential of the New Madrid Seismic Zone. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 92(6), 2080–2089.
https://doi.org/10.1785/0120010227
Mueller, K., Champion, J., Guccione, M., & Kelson, K. (1999). Fault slip rates in the modern New Madrid Seismic Zone. Science, 286(5442), 1135–1138.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5...
Hough, S.E. (2009). Cataloging the 1811–1812 New Madrid, central U.S., earthquake sequence. Seismological Research Letters, 80(6), 1045–1053.
https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.80.6.1045
Calais, E., Camelbeeck, T., Stein, S., Liu, M., & Craig, T.J. (2016). A new paradigm for large earthquakes in stable continental plate interiors. Geophysical Research Letters, 43(20), 10,621–10,637.
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070815
Craig, T.J., Chanard, K., & Calais, E. (2017). Hydrologically-driven crustal stresses and seismicity in the New Madrid Seismic Zone. Nature Communications, 8, 2143.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01...
INSTITUTIONAL REPORTS
Federal Emergency Management Agency & Mid-America Earthquake Center (2009). Impact of New Madrid Seismic Zone Earthquakes on the Central USA. MAE Center Report 09-03, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
U.S. Geological Survey (2014). Earthquake Hazard in the Heart of the Homeland. USGS Fact Sheet 2014-3026.
https://doi.org/10.3133/fs20143026
HISTORICAL PRIMARY SOURCES
Bradbury, J. (1817). Travels in the Interior of America in the Years 1809, 1810, and 1811. Sherwood, Neely & Jones, London.
Bryan, E. (1812). Letter to Lorenzo Dow describing the New Madrid earthquakes, 22 March 1812. Reproduced in Dow, L. (1849), History of Cosmopolite, Joshua Martin, Cincinnati.
Drake, D. (1815). Natural and Statistical View, or Picture of Cincinnati and the Miami Country. Looker & Wallace, Cincinnati.
In the winter of 1811-1812, three of the most powerful earthquakes in the recorded history of the contiguous United States struck the geological center of North America — twelve hundred miles from the nearest tectonic plate boundary, in a region where, by every model of plate tectonics, large earthquakes should not occur. The Mississippi River ran backward for several hours. Bells rang in Boston. Entire islands vanished overnight. A new lake formed in a single morning, drowning a cypress forest that still stands beneath the water today. This is the story of the New Madrid Seismic Zone — and the catastrophe the central United States chose not to remember.
CHAPTERS
00:00 The River Ran Backward
01:30 A Megaquake Where None Should Exist
03:28 December 16, 1811: The First Shock
05:25 Aftershocks and the Second Quake
07:05 The Ancient Reelfoot Rift
08:50 Bradbury, Brooks, and the Eyewitness Record
10:47 Tecumseh's Comet and Frontier Memory
13:03 Evidence of Earlier Earthquake Cycles
14:07 February 7, 1812: The Largest Shock
15:55 Reelfoot Lake Is Born
16:42 The Widest-Felt Quake in U.S. History
18:01 Collapse, Relief, and Forgotten Disaster
19:46 Modern Science Reopens the Case
21:19 Could It Happen Again?
22:07 The Risk to Modern America
PEER-REVIEWED SOURCES
Johnston, A.C. (1996). Seismic moment assessment of earthquakes in stable continental regions — III. New Madrid 1811–1812, Charleston 1886 and Lisbon 1755. Geophysical Journal International, 126(2), 314–344.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1...
Johnston, A.C., & Schweig, E.S. (1996). The enigma of the New Madrid earthquakes of 1811–1812. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 24, 339–384.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth...
Nuttli, O.W. (1973). The Mississippi Valley earthquakes of 1811 and 1812: Intensities, ground motion and magnitudes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 63(1), 227–248.
https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0630010227
Tuttle, M.P., Schweig, E.S., Sims, J.D., Lafferty, R.H., Wolf, L.W., & Haynes, M.L. (2002). The earthquake potential of the New Madrid Seismic Zone. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 92(6), 2080–2089.
https://doi.org/10.1785/0120010227
Mueller, K., Champion, J., Guccione, M., & Kelson, K. (1999). Fault slip rates in the modern New Madrid Seismic Zone. Science, 286(5442), 1135–1138.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5...
Hough, S.E. (2009). Cataloging the 1811–1812 New Madrid, central U.S., earthquake sequence. Seismological Research Letters, 80(6), 1045–1053.
https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.80.6.1045
Calais, E., Camelbeeck, T., Stein, S., Liu, M., & Craig, T.J. (2016). A new paradigm for large earthquakes in stable continental plate interiors. Geophysical Research Letters, 43(20), 10,621–10,637.
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070815
Craig, T.J., Chanard, K., & Calais, E. (2017). Hydrologically-driven crustal stresses and seismicity in the New Madrid Seismic Zone. Nature Communications, 8, 2143.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01...
INSTITUTIONAL REPORTS
Federal Emergency Management Agency & Mid-America Earthquake Center (2009). Impact of New Madrid Seismic Zone Earthquakes on the Central USA. MAE Center Report 09-03, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
U.S. Geological Survey (2014). Earthquake Hazard in the Heart of the Homeland. USGS Fact Sheet 2014-3026.
https://doi.org/10.3133/fs20143026
HISTORICAL PRIMARY SOURCES
Bradbury, J. (1817). Travels in the Interior of America in the Years 1809, 1810, and 1811. Sherwood, Neely & Jones, London.
Bryan, E. (1812). Letter to Lorenzo Dow describing the New Madrid earthquakes, 22 March 1812. Reproduced in Dow, L. (1849), History of Cosmopolite, Joshua Martin, Cincinnati.
Drake, D. (1815). Natural and Statistical View, or Picture of Cincinnati and the Miami Country. Looker & Wallace, Cincinnati.