There is a stone at the centre of Stonehenge that almost nobody photographs. Five metres long, flat on its face, half buried, crushed under a fallen sarsen that toppled onto it thousands of years ago. Millions of visitors have stood over it without knowing it was there. For a hundred years the textbooks said they knew where it came from, and for a hundred years they were wrong. Nobody dug it up to find out. The answer came from grains of mineral smaller than sand, dated in a laboratory and run through software that had every rock in Britain to compare them against. And what the machine matched them to should not have been possible in 2600 BC.
There is a stone at the centre of Stonehenge that almost nobody photographs. Five metres long, flat on its face, half buried, crushed under a fallen sarsen that toppled onto it thousands of years ago. Millions of visitors have stood over it without knowing it was there. For a hundred years the textbooks said they knew where it came from, and for a hundred years they were wrong. Nobody dug it up to find out. The answer came from grains of mineral smaller than sand, dated in a laboratory and run through software that had every rock in Britain to compare them against. And what the machine matched them to should not have been possible in 2600 BC.
How can we trust anything presented by AI?