1)Is anyone actually talking in the scene? If not, why not? Why are there people but no-one is talking? 2)If they are talking, do they sound robotic, stilted? Is the lip sync off? Do they all sound generic, the same? Is the script cringey and generic? 3)When looking at AI, ask yourself if what you're seeing is even remotely plausible (physically, politically etc). Look at the context, too. If the answer is no, then it's AI.
I think the pushback is going to be a gigantic renaissance in live art whether it be music, stage, painting.... all of it. Humans doing amazing things with no digital enhancement. Imagine that.
There are already projects moving in this direction. Kagi, for example, is building its âSmall Webâ around human-authored independent websites, while other projects are working on proof-of-human systems and human-only online spaces. Maybe the next step could be a dedicated part of the internet designed specifically for authentic human content, where bots and AI-generated content are clearly excluded or separated. As AI content becomes harder to distinguish from reality, I think genuinely human content could become increasingly valuable.
Reality check: the internet has been very very short on stock in the realness section for decades.
The existential crisis for contemporarily online people is the realization that what they project as realness about themselves could potentially be as transparently fake as the new fakeness that we can all conjure with ease.
There was a time when being fake online was a glamorous and rewarding pastime. Now it has been democratized and people feel less special.