You know he's talking about War Thunder when he mentions he learnt it himself

Ain’t no way bro learned weak spots from war thunder. That’s wild💀

War thunder bouta be a qualification on military resumes

Everyone talking about war thunder and I came here to say the same thing. Separated by languages but joined together as one by playing war thunder and destroying each other 😂

that commander who plays videogames definitely practiced that strategy on war thunder.

I bet you that Bradley guner plays war thunder 😂😂

The gunner said that he learned where to hit the T-90 from playing video games. The kamikaze drone flyers say the same thing.
So parents, your kids playing games may just be preparing them for the future. 😊

The fact that they compare a Bradley IFV to the most modern Russian Main Battle Tank in Ukraine is a huge testament to the Bradley.

Western kit is NOT a magic win button. The western TRAINING and MINDSET is what allows our gear to work.

Missing 3 shots back to back is crazy.
Literally hitting a single one of those shots might've won the T90 the battle.
No amount of armor or armament can save a bad crew.

Bradley is not considered a battlefield taxi. It's an infantry fighting vehicle. A M113 is a battlefield taxi. A Stryker is a battlefield taxi. A Bradley, with long range sensor and TOW missile launcher, is designed to fight the enemy.

It was an odd stroke of luck that the AP jammed, because those HE really devastated all those sensors. Amazing tenacity, those guys.

Please.  Stop calling the Bradley a "battlefield taxi".  It's an infantry fighting vehicle designed to deliver dismounted infantry to the forward edge of an engagement and REMAIN there, fighting alongside main battle tanks and attack helicopters in what is called combined arms mechanized warfare.  Armored personnel carriers like the U.S. M113 and the British FV432 are battlefield taxis.

Friendly fire stat is nothing short of WILD!

Something funny (not for Russians) is that philosophy of having a shorter tank was to reduce the time of exposure to  enemy fire and reduce the surface area of exposed portions of the tank (the turret basically). This is a philosophy which the Germans (and Russians) put in to practice with Tiger 2's/IS-2 turret face in which they reduced the section of the flat part of the turret to minimum which also decreased the likelihood of a shot trapping while also increasing the chance of ricocheting a round away from the tank. that's the reason it doesn't have (at the time) a traditional gun mantle. Fast forward the Russians apply this to a extreme with the "frying pan" type turret which while sacrificing internal volume (the crew compartment) for almost no flat surface on the frontal arcs of the tank. While they were at it they removed the manual loader (the man in manual) in favor of auto loader to reduce the height even more!
Fast forward again the employment of new ammunition that defeats angled armor is deployed which renders its "no flat surface philosophy (from ww2) moot. But at least it's still small and hard to spot!
Fast forward the deployment of advanced observation equipment which transformers  the battlefield to multi plane warfare were height isn't as important . Which renders the advantages of the T-72/T-64/T-80 shape less of a advantage and more of a detrimental foresight failure. So you get a tank with a cramped interior and not very effective armor with no real way to hide. The reason i didn't mention the T-90 above is because they actually changed the turret to fit modular flat facing armor on the front of the turret. The soviets already realized the flaws and were attempting to remedy the situation with Object 195 project, but the Soviet unions collapsed basically ended that, but portions of it were revised for object 148 (t-14) which was also canceled. Which im not sure if has been restarted or not in light of recent events.
So basically the tanks are made for a war that no longer exists. But who knows! i didn't think trench warfare was coming back but here we are.

The real weakness of the T-90M that is discussed here is very easy to see:  It got off three shots, and they were ALL misses.  That comes down to the comment that the expert made: CREW.  This tank was destroyed because the Russian Crew didn't know how to use their machine... and that was true before the HE explosive blinding attack began.  That's where the survivability of these machines really matters... the crew survives with their experience and training intact.

War Thunder that's how the Bradley beat the T-90

Hugely interesting video

Had no idea a trophy system would cost that much, but it feels like it’s magic with how fast they work, so makes sense.

Top draw journalism here, been really enjoying the videos lately.

From what I’ve learned from tanks etc. Many many videos get some basic facts or guesses way off, but all the information given in this video are very accurate compared to my knowledge and made easy to understand for less knowledged viewers. Perfection!

We always called ifvs battlefield taxis 😂