Oh... I get it. That text was made by AI. It has to be. A player or GW employee would never say "Prioritise units with better invulnerable saves than their armor saves" It HAS to be AI.
Oh yeah? I play Necrons where we have the most advanced weaponry and tech. Our guns can strip you apart atom by atom, layer by layer. Oh... hang on... you have a boltgun. :/
Bro you’ve been on such an emotional roller coaster with GW lately it’s kinda funny to watch. I didn’t get into warhammer until the last couple of years, so I’m not quite as invested, but it feels close to what world of Warcraft did to me for many years
I remember when rule errata's were a last resort used only in extreme situations. But now with the speed GW keeps trying to pump things out at, they're making lot's of mistakes and trying to fix them in the field.
Funny they bring up lascannons for space marines. As now no space marine model can take a las cannon. The only one I can think of is a land raider, and that is the default option.
Harlequins are a unit with a better invuln than their normal save. Its the only one I can think of, but they got that 4+ invuln with a 6+ normal armor. You'd also arguably take it on your normal armor on an Archon instead of whiffing the 2+ shadow field too.
The problem, is now all my not howling banshees basically treat space marines as durable as like rhinos. I'm used to it from fighting a lot of deathguard but its been rough.
🎩
🐍 no step on snek🇺🇸🇭🇰