KENAPA CANDI SEBESAR BOROBUDUR BISA DITINGGALKAN?
Ruang Makro
201,277 views
Of the two million stones that make up Borobudur, not one bears the name of its builder. The void has been filled in turn: by a frightened Javanese court, by a colonial official who claimed to have discovered it, by a scientist with the myth of the 1006 eruption, to the viral claim that the temple is a relic of Prophet Solomon. But its builders secretly left one mark.
This video traces the history of Borobudur through inscriptions, the records of archaeologists such as Nicolaas Krom and Soekmono, and the hidden foot of the temple where its builders were buried. We examine why the name of the commissioning king is still a matter of interpretation, why the myth of the 1006 eruption and the claim of Prophet Solomon are unfounded, and how this temple lives off the villages that are tied to its care. An essay on who is entitled to the story of Borobudur, and the true signature left by its workers twelve centuries ago. Watch until the end to see the part that is closest to that signature.
— Bab / Chapter —
0:00 Opener
0:37 Collapsed Memorization
2:42 Voice from the Inscription
5:30 Buried Feet
8:07 The Myth of the Merapi Eruption
11:11 Past Bonds
15:40 The Lost Reading
19:05 Discovery for the Recorder
22:27 Cost of Restoration
25:27 Prophet Solomon's claim
30:28 Signature Indeed
33:26 Source Footage
— Source / Reference :
• Thomas Stamford Raffles — The History of Java (1817), which notes that the name Borobudur comes from the surrounding population and the 1814 survey
• Nicolaas J. Krom — Dutch archaeologist who published a comprehensive study of Borobudur (Barabudur) and its dating
• Johannes G. de Casparis — epigrapher who read inscriptions related to Bhumi Sambhara and the name Samaratungga
• UNESCO World Heritage Center — official profile of Borobudur Temple Compounds and Landmarks of the Ancient Kingdom of Saba, Marib
• The Ministry of Religion of the Republic of Indonesia — the official translation of the Qur'an that houses the Kingdom of Saba' in Ma'rib, Yemen
• BBC News Indonesia — coverage that refutes the myth of Borobudur as the relic of Prophet Sulaiman
• ANTARA News Agency — news about KH Fahmi Basya's book and claims about Borobudur
• Daud Aris Tanudirjo — an archaeologist who discusses the relationship between the temple and its supporting community as well as the spread of pseudo-archaeological claims
#BOROBUDUR
20 Comments
Bebatuan situs bekas bangunan candi2 pada masing titik lokasinya masih ada sebagian beserta situs2 lingga, Yoni, peripih, lumpang sesaji, petirtaan2, dan bahkan 2 lingga bertulis ( prasasti pamegat swang 3 dan 4 ).
Sayangnya diriku gagal melestarikannya karena ketidakpedulian pihak kelurahan dan warga.
Bikin channel pun gagal ( visi pelestarian ).
Telah banyak situs-situs abad 8 di desaku dsk yang telah kulaporkan lalu didata oleh semula bpcb Jawa Tengah lalu BPK wilayah X Jateng dan DIY. Tapi sayangnya meskipun telah didata tiada upaya pelestarian.
Terakhir penemuan situs kala makara hanya berselang 2 hari lalu raib sebelum sempat diamankan.
Semoga ada kreator yang Sudi untuk memposting video tentang desaku sbg sebuah warisan budaya dan sejarah yang terlupakan. Terimakasih, salam budaya.
Luruskan sejarah Nusantara karna banyak oknum ingin membelokan sejarah Nusantara kita....
Di Islam juga banyak yang membelokan sejarah dan tokoh, Islam di Nusantara
Makanya saya tidak begitu yakin dengan sejarawan
Borobudur dan candi² lain yg banyak tersebar di kawasan jateng dan jatim adalah hasil karya nenek moyang kita.
Candi² yg pernah dibangun perlahan ditinggalkan karena perpindahan ibukota dan masyarakat sekitar udah gak bisa merawat dan membiayai biaya operasional utk perawatan bangunan suci itu. Perlahan bangunan candi terbengkalai dan terkubur oleh alam. Tapi ingatan kolektif masyarakat thd candi tsb tidak benar² hilang, masih tersimpan dalam cerita dari mulut ke mulut selama beberapa generasi. Dan ingatan tsb mulai memudar ketika kerajaan hindu-buddha di jawa runtuh dan masyarakat di jawa udah berganti kepercayaan jd muslim.
Mungkin kita jg pantas mengucapkan terimakasih pd pemerintah kolonial waktu itu yg membiayai proses penggalian dan pemugaran candi besar macam borobudur, prambanan, dan juga candi² lain macam candi mendut, candi singosari, candi songgoriti, candi jawi, dll.
Tapi dilain pihak banyak jg oknum² pemerintah hindia-belanda yg menjarah artefak² kuno dari candi dan diboyong ke luar negeri, diperdagangkan secara ilegal dan sengaja diberikan pada pihak lain sbg hadiah.
Jauh sebelum era kolonial sebenarnya masyarakat kita jaman dulu jg sengaja menjarah candi² yg udah ditinggalkan. Ada pemburu harta karun candi, mereka mencari peripih yg berisi emas dan benda berharga lain yg sengaja dikubur di bawah sumuran struktur candi. Masyarakat sekitar reruntuhan candi juga kerap mengambil bebatuan candi untuk membangun fondasi rumah, irigasi dan jalan.
Jadi adalah tugas generasi sekarang dan kedepannya untuk menjaga warisan leluhur ini, menuntut pengembalian artefak² kuno yg masih berada di luar indonesia dan meluruskan sejarah peradaban bangsa ini yg sesuai metodologi penelitian ilmu sejarah dan ilmu kepurbakalaan. Agar generasi selanjutnya tahu asal usulnya dan pencapaian apa saja yg udah dicapai oleh para pendahulu kita utk memicu semangat membangun bangsa yg jauh lebih baik dimasa depan.
KENAPA CANDI SEBESAR BOROBUDUR BISA DITINGGALKAN?
Ruang Makro
201,277 views
Of the two million stones that make up Borobudur, not one bears the name of its builder. The void has been filled in turn: by a frightened Javanese court, by a colonial official who claimed to have discovered it, by a scientist with the myth of the 1006 eruption, to the viral claim that the temple is a relic of Prophet Solomon. But its builders secretly left one mark.
This video traces the history of Borobudur through inscriptions, the records of archaeologists such as Nicolaas Krom and Soekmono, and the hidden foot of the temple where its builders were buried. We examine why the name of the commissioning king is still a matter of interpretation, why the myth of the 1006 eruption and the claim of Prophet Solomon are unfounded, and how this temple lives off the villages that are tied to its care. An essay on who is entitled to the story of Borobudur, and the true signature left by its workers twelve centuries ago. Watch until the end to see the part that is closest to that signature.
— Bab / Chapter —
0:00 Opener
0:37 Collapsed Memorization
2:42 Voice from the Inscription
5:30 Buried Feet
8:07 The Myth of the Merapi Eruption
11:11 Past Bonds
15:40 The Lost Reading
19:05 Discovery for the Recorder
22:27 Cost of Restoration
25:27 Prophet Solomon's claim
30:28 Signature Indeed
33:26 Source Footage
— Source / Reference :
• Thomas Stamford Raffles — The History of Java (1817), which notes that the name Borobudur comes from the surrounding population and the 1814 survey
• Nicolaas J. Krom — Dutch archaeologist who published a comprehensive study of Borobudur (Barabudur) and its dating
• Johannes G. de Casparis — epigrapher who read inscriptions related to Bhumi Sambhara and the name Samaratungga
• UNESCO World Heritage Center — official profile of Borobudur Temple Compounds and Landmarks of the Ancient Kingdom of Saba, Marib
• The Ministry of Religion of the Republic of Indonesia — the official translation of the Qur'an that houses the Kingdom of Saba' in Ma'rib, Yemen
• BBC News Indonesia — coverage that refutes the myth of Borobudur as the relic of Prophet Sulaiman
• ANTARA News Agency — news about KH Fahmi Basya's book and claims about Borobudur
• Daud Aris Tanudirjo — an archaeologist who discusses the relationship between the temple and its supporting community as well as the spread of pseudo-archaeological claims
#BOROBUDUR