this is why i think DNs story is rubbish jasper says the passanger in his car was frustrated with jaspers driving and DNs story goes on about how mick was angry when DN pulled out its just to much the same as jaspers
Firstly he is arrested shortly after the murders on a serious charge separate to the murders themselves. Then realizing he is facing a hefty sentence for the crime he has been arrested for, tries to go Supergrass on his involvement in The Range Rover Murders. He has no connection with Steele, Whomes or The Essex Boys. He is simply asked to drive someone to Rettendon on the night or early hours of the 6/7 to do a drugs deal.
Secondly, he has never been there before but quite clearly shows the route and turn off he took to take the assassin there. He describes in detail the events leading up to the shooting and puts serious hardened criminals in the frame.
Thirdly he describes the drop off zone and the time zone. Not only does he do that, but in his 12 Page hand written statement, he discribes the collection of the assassin the guns, the stop offs on the way, and also the drop off, the wait and the journey back to the wine bar that night. Now this is very detailed.
Fourtly he makes a statement on tape and in writing as to the events leading up to that night regarding the murders in the police station. He later admits that he knew they were going to be murdered.
Fifthly he arrives in court to give evidence at the trial of Steele and Whomes as per his statements, both in writing and on tape to state that he was actually the driver on the night, with somebody else who shot the three in the lane.
For me this is how it happened. He made the admission on tape, in his own handwriting, and, was prepared to stand up in court and make those admissions.
Why would he do that?
I have seen footage lately I think with Shaun Attiwood and Jasper where he tries to dismiss this, yet at the time he made those statements and admissions.
It's evident that an attempt on his life happened shortly after his arrest at the time.
If he denies things now, I feel it is because he actually was telling the truth about the murders, and in fear for his life, especially from the assassin who is still alive and at large, that he wants to keep a lid on it now.
I’m Irish ☘️ and still fascinated by this whole case, it’s mad; I’ve seen shootings and mad stuff in DC (Dublin City) but this one is like some kinda lore or something…like Regency Shooting in DC …not just me, ppl can’t get enough of this case. Gangland Lore
No matter which version you believe , you have to ask yourself this . Nichols gave his version after being arrested with the Cannabis and was coached by handlers . What did BJ have to gain or lose by giving his version ? Ie did he stand to gain anything by giving up other higher up criminals within OC ?
Mick steel was a smuggler esex police wanted putting away so after leah betts they killed the 3 stooges in the range and blamed steele 2 5 birds 1 stone .
What about all the calls to Tate ,Rolfe and Tucker went unanswered after 7 pm and failed attendance to meal booking at 8.30? No they were dead by then not this midnight nonsense by Jasper.
The trouble with jasper is......he's soooooo vague it's yes no can't remember not prepared to say......no winder police thought he was waste of time. Stick to facts......meal booked not attending...the conversation with rolfe and Donna that they were meeting steele ......the ping from.mobiles whomes and Nicholls in that area.....Saunders warning steele tate was planning to rip him off.......jasper is self confessed junkie why would u use him as get away driver ? Why would one of gunmen wear white trainers and trackie on cold snowing Dec night don't think so......after listening to this video I still think right men convicted
Essex Boys Case - Billy Jasper At The Trial of Steele & Whomes