11 septembre : ce physicien conteste le récit officiel !
Tocsin+
100,473 views
đ Support us, donate to Tocsin: https://tocsin-media.fr/nous
đą Tune in to Alexandre Cuignache's science curiosity show every Thursday at noon on Tocsin+
In this episode of Science Curiosities, Alexandre Cuignache interviews François Roby, a physics lecturer at the University of Pau, to examine the collapse of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, using arguments from mechanics, thermodynamics, and image analysis. The show challenges the official explanations for the Twin Towers and Building 7, presenting them as physically incomplete or insufficient.
00:00 I Introduction â September 11: What do the laws of physics say?
02:02 I François Roby: Analyzing the World Trade Center collapses
03:17 I "Conspiracy theorist": A word that stifles debate?
05:31 I Kinematics and dynamics: Studying images of the collapses
07:56 I Twin Towers: A stronger steel structure at the base
10:16 I Official reports: What they explainâand what they don't model
13:35 I Structural strength and observed acceleration
14:20 I Safety factors for skyscrapers against wind and earthquakes
18:18 I The acceleration of the North Tower: Frame-by-frame analysis
20:30 I A gradual fall or a sudden collapse?
21:15 I The "pancake collapse" hypothesis scrutinized
24:02 I Steel and fires: why heat can't explain everything
25:07 I The hammer and nail: understanding resistance to collapse
28:08 I WTC 7: the 2.25 seconds of free fall recognized by NIST
29:18 I WTC 7: fires, debris, and the principle of symmetry of causes
31:34 I Why the free fall of Building 7 raises questions
33:14 I Twin Towers: rubble, energy, and floor resistance
35:22 I The thermal question: why did the fires last so long?
37:25 I Heat, Steel, and Thermodynamics: The Example of a Coffee Cup
41:01 I Ground Zero: Estimating the Thermal Energy Released After Collapses
đ Subscribe to Tocsin+ so you don't miss anything
đČ Follow us on social media
đŹ Share your thoughts in the comments
#ScientificCuriosities #TocsinPlus #Towers #Twins #NewYork #Collapse #GroundZero #WTC #Physics
20 Comments
Par conséquent en 2026, du fait de la date du11 septembre 2001, il resterait encore 25% de ce tritium initial qui aurait été enfoui à environ 100 mÚtres sous Ground 0 (dans cette hypothÚse qui apparaßt solide).
C'est aux Américains de laver leur linge sale.
Nous, français habitant en Russie on a bien compris qu'en France il existe une justice purement politique quand on constate les sanctions non judiciaires contre Jacques Baud et X. Moreau.
Clair, prĂ©cis, et dâune redoutable simplicitĂ©..,
Merci pour le reportage.
Des hypothĂšses qui constituront un jour certainement des preuves du Ă©niĂšme complot contre les peuples.
Merci Monsieur.
lors de ce 25 Ăšme anniversaire du 11 septembre. On a eu le droit au mĂȘme plat rĂ©chauffĂ©,
et l'interdiction presque formelle de toute remise en cause. Pourtant Ă travers le monde
les compétences existent, pour analyser cette scÚne de crime, quitte à en tirer des conclusions
divergentes . Mais c'est vraiment là , que la notion d'Etat Profond peut selon la vérité, nous
conduire Ă penser qu'au delĂ des cachotteries, il pourrait-ĂȘtre malĂ©fique. On peut penser
aussi que malgré le savoir engrangé, l'humain ne s'interroge pas vraiment.
11 septembre : ce physicien conteste le récit officiel !
Tocsin+
100,473 views
đ Support us, donate to Tocsin: https://tocsin-media.fr/nous
đą Tune in to Alexandre Cuignache's science curiosity show every Thursday at noon on Tocsin+
In this episode of Science Curiosities, Alexandre Cuignache interviews François Roby, a physics lecturer at the University of Pau, to examine the collapse of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, using arguments from mechanics, thermodynamics, and image analysis. The show challenges the official explanations for the Twin Towers and Building 7, presenting them as physically incomplete or insufficient.
00:00 I Introduction â September 11: What do the laws of physics say?
02:02 I François Roby: Analyzing the World Trade Center collapses
03:17 I "Conspiracy theorist": A word that stifles debate?
05:31 I Kinematics and dynamics: Studying images of the collapses
07:56 I Twin Towers: A stronger steel structure at the base
10:16 I Official reports: What they explainâand what they don't model
13:35 I Structural strength and observed acceleration
14:20 I Safety factors for skyscrapers against wind and earthquakes
18:18 I The acceleration of the North Tower: Frame-by-frame analysis
20:30 I A gradual fall or a sudden collapse?
21:15 I The "pancake collapse" hypothesis scrutinized
24:02 I Steel and fires: why heat can't explain everything
25:07 I The hammer and nail: understanding resistance to collapse
28:08 I WTC 7: the 2.25 seconds of free fall recognized by NIST
29:18 I WTC 7: fires, debris, and the principle of symmetry of causes
31:34 I Why the free fall of Building 7 raises questions
33:14 I Twin Towers: rubble, energy, and floor resistance
35:22 I The thermal question: why did the fires last so long?
37:25 I Heat, Steel, and Thermodynamics: The Example of a Coffee Cup
41:01 I Ground Zero: Estimating the Thermal Energy Released After Collapses
đ Subscribe to Tocsin+ so you don't miss anything
đČ Follow us on social media
đŹ Share your thoughts in the comments
#ScientificCuriosities #TocsinPlus #Towers #Twins #NewYork #Collapse #GroundZero #WTC #Physics