I'm afraid you thinking this situation is improving will make the end result all the more painful.

Loving the new intro man!! 🔥🔥🔥🔥

Whatever the outcome (probably a guilty one) City will be scarred for life from this and rivals will never let it go

This gives off "Im left handed guys, i paid with my right hand im innocent" vibes... How can this be a serious defence... I dont trust them, why should the Prem?

I remember the first I watched City, I was just passing by, I saw Vincent Kompany being so relaxed while he was playing at the back, I said let me watch this team, I started to search for their name, I said I want watch their next game, maybe they only good on this game. Next game, I was like. No I really like the style.
I didn't even know they had money.

.......That was a good ending😂🩵

115 down, waiting for comeback Blues 💙

Bro you are the light at the end of the tunnel 😅
and if the tunnel doesn't end, you're the light in the tunnel 🩵🇿🇦

As KK once said "I would just love it" if the prem used AI for evidence analysis and without a human in the looooooop😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅

The PL must be ready to pay a focking big amount of money, and calling it sham will be used in the next transfer window

Every city fan get watching the QPR game get the algorithm up 😂😂😂😂😂👍🍺

If this is to be read correctly, sheik Mansour, the owner, DOES NOT give his personal money and/or his companies money. The money had come from STATE companies. NO ONE IS AN OWNER OF A STATE. Hi is prime minister, NOT owner ! NO RULES BROKEN !

*Sure, not absolutely clean, BUT NOT BRAKING THE RULE !

"Man City to BLOW The 115 Case WIDE OPEN!"

Er...no they don't, this was already submitted and rejected by the independent panel.

The top and bottom of it is that they attempted to create a system to disguise where the funds originated,which we all know came indirectly from the club's owner.

There's no smoke without fire!

They should be done for blatant Lying!!!!!!!!

Guess they should have shown this “new evidence” during the last 1000’s of days of interviews with the relevant people who were holding the investigation.

Those financial charges didn’t stop David De Gea from conceding that goal & that clown 🤡 wants PL trophy 😂😂

There was me thinking this was all sub judice and subject to confidentiality...
What a joke.
This will count against city.

You are completely confusing how arbitration works. The evidence WAS properly examined. The independent tribunal spent years reviewing thousands of bank records, emails, and witness testimonies before delivering their decision.
​City presented that exact Crown Prince Court defense during the hearing. The panel did not just ignore it, they evaluated it thoroughly and explicitly concluded that the government grant explanation was concocted after the fact to cover up £830 million in disguised owner funding. Calling a witness dishonest is not dismissing them without trial, it is the trier of fact reaching a deliberate conclusion after hearing their testimony under cross-examination.
​The Premier League already met its burden of proof. This is not an ongoing accusation, it is a formal guilty finding from a three-person judicial panel.
​An appeal is not a re-trial where you get to re-run the same rejected arguments. The Appeal Board only assesses procedural errors or misapplications of the law. Claiming the verdict is invalid because you dislike how the judges weighed the evidence shows a complete misunderstanding of the legal process.

They cannot provide new evidence, that is what an appeal is. They appeal against the ruling because of a mistake in proceedings. Not produce a get out jail free card. Where was this evidence when they were refusing to cooperate.