BROOO U DID IT HELL YES YOU ARE THE MAN! This dropped right as I boarded my flight. Gunna make it much more entertaining. Keep up the great work.

Do a Debate between Ayn Rand and Immanuel Kant.

I'm enjoying watching these videos. Thanks.

We're kind of ignoring the fact that they were both raging narcissists and such a conversation wouldn't have gone anything like this 😆

This a very interesting dialogue because it enables the listener to see each philosophy through the eyes of those whose personal experiences shaped them. I have long maintained that personal experience is largely responsible for how we think.

Redo this debate but with G.K
Chesterton, who was one of the pioneers of distributism.  Capitalism vs communism vs distributism.

That was pretty interesting.

great one

YES!!!!

Every system produces corruption because problem is the human nature. And no matter what system is in place there will always be people that will abuse it for their own good.

Heated

Obviously they're talking about Uber.
I have been an Uber driver with 20,000 rides.
The CEO makes 991 times more per year than the average driver.

They ideals are like to end of a board, with the middle on to of a flagpole.
Going too far one way or the other will cause you to fall.

4:00
"But i am poor" said the poor man.
"jUsT gEt A jOb" said the boomer.

Fashionable saying: "burning down my house will not help you build yours..." BUT rhe inventor of the modern coffee industry proved it wrong...disposession may be the best tool for some...these are the capitalist that no longer have the right to exist...money can be made without destroying  others or  by destroying others...we just have a.little trouble to settle...

Can you do a debate between capitalism and communism/socialism?

Example: Adam Smith Vs Karl Marx

This is just Nietzsche’s classic “master morality" vs "slave morality" completely pointless debate of two lunatics in their own way.

I am enjoying this series I wish ai would be used for these reasons you are displaying.

3:03 when we talk about the ownership, one thing that comes is, how do we decide who actually gets the ownership and who doesn’t?

Why is it that the hard work of one person, in case of the regime of slavery, the slave owner just happens to overpower, someone who wants used to be a creation of God, who was living a free life, and just by the matter of being more stronger, that creation of God once living a free life, becomes the property of someone. By the way, both are the creation of God. And then all the Labor done by the slave, that becomes the production of the one who enslaved a creation of God, who, once upon a time used to be living free life.

Has the ownership or production actually been the entitlement of the one who produced it, or anyone who was able to show or project greater amount of strength on the weaker one.

The next question is, if the entitlement on the production of goods and services, the function of the relative strength, how is the disparity between the two strengths even emerge?

And when someone gains the higher relative strength, was that higher relative strength actually the result of the person alone who gained it, or is the result of the multiple number of people throughout the history, who had built an environment for the person who gained the higher amount of relative strength, which he is using today?

And if the Relative strength becomes the function of both of his merit, and the environment which was created by the merit of his own ancestors and the people who were helping or not helping his ancestors?

And if the strength partially becomes a function of the labour that human being himself has not done, and so is the utility of the strength, how can we possibly say that the stronger person amongst the two, actually had entitlement over the production of the slave the stronger person captured?

It’s hard to believe that Ayn Rand considered exploitation of any worker, even children, to be criminal.