Reading the book now and although he doesn’t mention Charles too much-the story he is telling just solidifies the callous and indifference of the Windsors and its systematic corruption and toxicity.
Didn't Diana tell us all...???...So why is there any doubt...???...Also Earl Spencers eulogy also express his anger at the time.when grief must have felt like a knife....
I like earl spencer as he has Diana best interest at heart .no body is perfect and that goes to Royals too.Daina was the must hunted so pleased Diana is back home where she belongs .
What happens is life, and there will be aa lot more books challenging what happened at the time coming out in the next year. I do not argue either is right or wrong - it just is. Truth will prevail and we all have to sit through it unconfortableness one way or another and rise flike the pheonix from the ashes. All of us with our own crosses and burdens even years are the uncomfortable situation has passed. Unfortunately they put Diana's sanity on trial and are now doing it to Charles Spencer.
The message is the message - and we all have to sift through the evidence to find wht possible truth may be lurking there - even if the rtuth feels contradictory. A face for one person or group , and a different face for others.
Richard Kay and Janice Jenkins an ex Charles III mistress have told two similar tales to what Charles S has said.