Feynman wyjaśnia, dokąd znika chwila, gdy staje się przeszłością
Drugie Dno Fizyki
18,489 views
⏳ If there is only the present, why can't physics pinpoint a single, shared "now"?
🌌 In this video, we'll explore what the passage of time truly means and why everyday intuition begins to falter even when we look at the Sun, Sirius, or the Andromeda Galaxy. We'll see how motion changes our assessment of simultaneity, what world lines and light cones are, and why two observers can describe what's happening now in a distant place differently. We'll also examine entropy, memory, and the physical traces that make the past seem closed and the future remain unknown.
📚 Resources:
Einstein Online - Spacetime
Einstein Online - Light Cone
Einstein Online - World Line
The Feynman Lectures on Physics - Chapter 15
The Feynman Lectures on Physics - Chapter 46
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy - Time
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy - Being and Becoming in Modern Physics
#physics #science #space #universe #quantumphysics #scientifictrivia #time #past #spacetime #relativity #entropy #einstein ———
About this video
This video is not a simple compilation, summary, or repetition of existing content. It was created as a standalone work: information from several scientific sources, experiments, and the history of discoveries are compared and combined into a single, coherent structure of explanation.
During the preparation of each episode, we:
• examine how the phenomenon is described in a school textbook and where this image breaks down;
• compare scientific sources and the history of discovery;
• search for the mechanism behind the phenomenon;
• distinguish the name of the phenomenon from its explanation;
• build a line of explanation from everyday experience to modern physics.
The line of explanation is tailored to a specific topic, and the material is not a summary of a single source. The primary value of the film lies in the research, analysis, interpretation, and logical construction of the explanation. The images and video materials serve an illustrative and explanatory purpose.
The film is inspired by the method and published lectures of Richard Feynman. The channel is not affiliated with Richard Feynman, his family, or Caltech.
The material is based on publicly available sources and contains the author's own analysis and interpretation. The information presented should not be considered absolute or definitive truth. Scientific knowledge is evolving, so some explanations and theories may be refined with new research.
The film is an independent editorial work: to recreate it, one would have to conduct research, select sources, analyze and build the structure all over again.
17 Comments
Idąc dalej Jak definiujesz w takim układzie statystykę?
Według Myślenia Niezależnego zachodzą kolejne cykle ZMIENNOŚCI , a nie kolejne cykle tego wymyślonego "" czasu "" . To nie czas nas zmienia , tylko kolejne cykle zmienności . I te pytania zagadki są bez sensu .
Jednak problem tkwi nie tyle w tematyce wymyślonych określeń czegoś , co nie istnieje . Problem tkwi w tym , że natura ludzkich mózgów nie pozwala na oddanie chociażby jednego długo używanego określenia . Tak jak w przypadku tego "" czasu "" .
A , według Myślenia Niezależnego takich określeń czegoś , co nie występuje , co nie zachodzi , takich określeń do likwidacji
jest 13 . Do modyfikacji jest 6 określeń .
I zachodzi proces odrzucania tego , co nowe , bo stare jest jeszcze silnie reprezentowane w mózgu . Jeśli ludzki mózg milion razy operował określeniem "" czas "" , to jedna , czy dwie informacje o nieistnieniu "" czasu "" , nie spowodują przyjęcia tego , co nowe . Po prostu to stare odrzuca nowe . Dużego drzewa jednym , czy dwoma uderzeniami topora nie zrąbiesz . Trzeba dużo uderzeń .
Ile razy informacja o nieistnieniu czasu powinna trafić do mózgu ? Ile uderzeń topora potrzeba w przypadku "" czasu "" ?
I ludzki mózg wybiera najprostsze rozwiązanie . Mózg odrzuca to , co nowe i ma spokój . I już nie musi pracować z wytężeniem nad tym , co się nie zgadza .
A , ten filmik , w rzeczywistości , jest bez sensu . A , ludzkie mózgi jeszcze setki lat będą uparcie szukać sensu tam , gdzie go nie ma .
Zarfil
Feynman wyjaśnia, dokąd znika chwila, gdy staje się przeszłością
Drugie Dno Fizyki
18,489 views
⏳ If there is only the present, why can't physics pinpoint a single, shared "now"?
🌌 In this video, we'll explore what the passage of time truly means and why everyday intuition begins to falter even when we look at the Sun, Sirius, or the Andromeda Galaxy. We'll see how motion changes our assessment of simultaneity, what world lines and light cones are, and why two observers can describe what's happening now in a distant place differently. We'll also examine entropy, memory, and the physical traces that make the past seem closed and the future remain unknown.
📚 Resources:
Einstein Online - Spacetime
Einstein Online - Light Cone
Einstein Online - World Line
The Feynman Lectures on Physics - Chapter 15
The Feynman Lectures on Physics - Chapter 46
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy - Time
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy - Being and Becoming in Modern Physics
#physics #science #space #universe #quantumphysics #scientifictrivia #time #past #spacetime #relativity #entropy #einstein ———
About this video
This video is not a simple compilation, summary, or repetition of existing content. It was created as a standalone work: information from several scientific sources, experiments, and the history of discoveries are compared and combined into a single, coherent structure of explanation.
During the preparation of each episode, we:
• examine how the phenomenon is described in a school textbook and where this image breaks down;
• compare scientific sources and the history of discovery;
• search for the mechanism behind the phenomenon;
• distinguish the name of the phenomenon from its explanation;
• build a line of explanation from everyday experience to modern physics.
The line of explanation is tailored to a specific topic, and the material is not a summary of a single source. The primary value of the film lies in the research, analysis, interpretation, and logical construction of the explanation. The images and video materials serve an illustrative and explanatory purpose.
The film is inspired by the method and published lectures of Richard Feynman. The channel is not affiliated with Richard Feynman, his family, or Caltech.
The material is based on publicly available sources and contains the author's own analysis and interpretation. The information presented should not be considered absolute or definitive truth. Scientific knowledge is evolving, so some explanations and theories may be refined with new research.
The film is an independent editorial work: to recreate it, one would have to conduct research, select sources, analyze and build the structure all over again.