The plaintiff says she paid the defendant a deposit for an apartment, but when she arrived to move in, she discovered the place was completely flooded. She claims the defendant refused to return her deposit, leaving her with no choice but to take the matter to court.

The defendants argue that the plaintiff began complaining about the apartment almost immediately after moving in — even before a pipe eventually broke and caused the flooding.

Now, both sides bring their stories before the judge. Who is telling the truth, and who should be held responsible for the money?

Watch the full courtroom case to hear both sides and see the judge’s decision.