The Last Sumerian Who Remembered Göbekli Tepe — What He Wrote Before Dying (2900 BCE)
Cuneiform Vault
55,672 views
A mysterious clay tablet in the British Museum may preserve a memory far older than Sumer itself. This documentary explores the claim that an ancient Sumerian scribe recorded an oral tradition about a temple of stone pillars where the gods gathered before kingship descended from heaven — a description that seems to echo Göbekli Tepe, the 11,000-year-old ritual site uncovered in southeastern Turkey.
Long before Sumerian cities, cuneiform writing, kings, ziggurats, or agriculture, Göbekli Tepe’s massive T-shaped limestone pillars were carved, raised, used for ritual gatherings, and then deliberately buried. Thousands of years later, Sumerian texts like the King List, the Eridu Genesis, foundation deposits, and apkallu traditions still preserved memories of a world before the Flood, when sacred knowledge was inherited from something older.
Was Göbekli Tepe remembered through thousands of years of oral tradition? Did Sumer inherit fragments of an older sacred system? And could the first temples have come before the first cities? This video investigates the strange connection between Göbekli Tepe, Sumerian mythology, ancient oral memory, foundation tablets, and the forgotten world before kingship descended from heaven.
20 Comments
Tableta AO 6018 este o copie pe lut a unei inscripții monumentale care descrie victoria regelui sumerian Utu-Hegal din orașul-stat Uruk asupra lui Tirigan, ultimul conducător al gutienilor. Inscripția datează din jurul anului 2110 î.Hr. și marchează sfârșitul dominației gutiene în Mesopotamia.Nu aminteste nimic si nu face nici o trimitere catre Gőbekli Tepe...
The script begins with a tablet supposedly:
cataloged AO-6018
in the British Museum
written around 2900 BCE
containing 17 fragmentary lines about “a temple of stone pillars”
supposedly written by an elderly scribe whose name may have been “Nanche”
allegedly describing details that match Göbekli Tepe.
That is not what AO 6018 is.
AO 6018 is in the Louvre, not the British Museum. The Louvre identifies it as an Old Babylonian-period tablet, approximately 1894–1595 BCE, and describes it as a copy of a monumental inscription recounting Utuhegal of Uruk’s victory over Tirigan, king of Gutium.
So these claims in the transcript appear unsupported or false:
“Catalog number AO-6018 written approximately 2900 BCE…”
“17 fragmentary lines describing a temple of stone pillars…”
“His name … was likely Nanche…”
“His final tablet contains 17 partially legible lines…”
the long supposed translation about pillars, serpents, scorpions, birds of prey, and buried knowledge.
1) Made of stone, limestone
2) Are huge
3) precisely engineered which is unexplainable and far ahead of times
4) could not be built in a reasonable time period with just human labor in a linear manner
5) the technology is regressive in nature - meaning future generations were unable to match or reproduce the earliest construction
One of the possible theories is India based and called the asura legacy. The asuras were experts of stone structures, had advanced techniques like maya styled architecture, used flying chariots etc etc. And most curious - they lived underground due to a curse by the GODS.
The asuras and devas were at loggerheads all the time and frequently at war with each other spanning several millennia into antiquity. The asuras hid themselves from the rampaging devas in hideouts underground
The devas despised stone structures calling them dark omens and destroyed these settlements with advanced weapons (vajra and agni)
The asura clan was almost eliminated around the younger dryas. So if the stone structures are not as old as 10000 years we must assign them to the pastoral group which tried to replicate what they saw but failed because they lacked the technology and the wherewithal of the asura clans.
There's a lot to catch up..
The Last Sumerian Who Remembered Göbekli Tepe — What He Wrote Before Dying (2900 BCE)
Cuneiform Vault
55,672 views
A mysterious clay tablet in the British Museum may preserve a memory far older than Sumer itself. This documentary explores the claim that an ancient Sumerian scribe recorded an oral tradition about a temple of stone pillars where the gods gathered before kingship descended from heaven — a description that seems to echo Göbekli Tepe, the 11,000-year-old ritual site uncovered in southeastern Turkey.
Long before Sumerian cities, cuneiform writing, kings, ziggurats, or agriculture, Göbekli Tepe’s massive T-shaped limestone pillars were carved, raised, used for ritual gatherings, and then deliberately buried. Thousands of years later, Sumerian texts like the King List, the Eridu Genesis, foundation deposits, and apkallu traditions still preserved memories of a world before the Flood, when sacred knowledge was inherited from something older.
Was Göbekli Tepe remembered through thousands of years of oral tradition? Did Sumer inherit fragments of an older sacred system? And could the first temples have come before the first cities? This video investigates the strange connection between Göbekli Tepe, Sumerian mythology, ancient oral memory, foundation tablets, and the forgotten world before kingship descended from heaven.