New Kernel, New video!
Live Stream Channel: @Maple-Circuit-Live
Notes/Sources: https://maplecircuit.dev/linux/kernel...
Discord: Discord: discord
0:00 Intro
0:59 FEATURED: SWAP
12:53 FEATURED: Multi-Gen LRU
22:00 FEATURED: AI or not???
34:49 FEATURED: Cache Aware Scheduling
36:35 ARCH
42:56 FS
55:38 MM
57:55 NET
58:28 Misc
1:02:37 Benchmark
1:04:24 Maple Time!
New Kernel, New video!
Live Stream Channel: @Maple-Circuit-Live
Notes/Sources: https://maplecircuit.dev/linux/kernel...
Discord: Discord: discord
0:00 Intro
0:59 FEATURED: SWAP
12:53 FEATURED: Multi-Gen LRU
22:00 FEATURED: AI or not???
34:49 FEATURED: Cache Aware Scheduling
36:35 ARCH
42:56 FS
55:38 MM
57:55 NET
58:28 Misc
1:02:37 Benchmark
1:04:24 Maple Time!
For AI, there is an argument that goes like this:
If we have a tool that is so morally reprehensible that a lot of devs quit, wouldn't Linus/the kernel team react?
Yes! But this can still be argued on technical ground. Linus would not be making his decisions based on morality. He would be making them based on the loss of devs.
In fact, no matter the reason the devs give, if a new tool makes more loss than gain, it should be removed.
Hope it helps!