I love listening to Boycott talk about cricket, he has the stereotype of the dour Yorkshireman but listening back to this you can see he's making constructive points and giving credit where he feels it's due. The value of expertise.
In the period 1968-86. Yorkshire were a team that lost most of its experienced team. Or in the cases of Illingworth and Close left altogether and went to Somerset and Leicestershire. Plus the policy of only selecting Yorkshire born player's whilst every other county had West Indians, South African, Australian and Indian players they could employ. Yorkshire with Boycott as captain never worked. He has admitted he shouldn't have taken the job. In 1983 they won The John Player League.
The only comparison I can find to Pietersen in the England dressing room 2005-14 is Boycott in the Yorkshire team 1971-86. So no doubt Boycott supports Pietersen.
Both of them were superlative batsmen but played for themselves and dragged the side down as a result. Pietersen was worse than Boycott - texting the Saffers, provoking the KPGenius Twitter. Yorkshiremen are famously thin-skinned, but Afrikaners are even more thin-skinned - no sense of humour at all.
It seems counter-intuitive to suggest KP averaging 60 should be dropped when the other batsmen average 30, but if KP drags the whole side down that's it. The question is not how many runs does each batsman average but does the side win? The individual batsman's ego is sublimated to the team's interest. Neither Pietersen nor Boycott realised this.
Also, the issue of the strike rate. Are you scoring runs quickly enough that your team could win? I hope even Boycott would acknowledge that Boycott never took this into account, hence Yorkshire won so little between 1968 and 1986. With KP it was different; he scored runs where Boycott didn't, but he was such an arsehole no-one wanted to be near him.
Boycott sprays England's batters
cricket.com.au
68,667 views
Former England cricketer Geoffrey Boycott laments the state of play for England's opening batsmen.