Entitled Father Back in Court Demanding Unsupervised Custody
People in Court After Dark
1,036 views
Entitled father returns to family court demanding custody despite ongoing concerns about his behavior and judgment.
Pro se custody case highlighting courtroom behavior, parental responsibility, and how judges evaluate the best interests of the child.
LINK TO PART 1: Father Demands Unsupervised Custody — Then...
Welcome to People In Court After Dark! I'm so glad you're here. Let's watch...
In a previous hearing, this father appeared by Zoom demanding unsupervised parenting time — but the hearing was cut short after he revealed he was in an inpatient facility and began making statements that raised serious concerns.
Now he’s back.
The judge works through the standard custody factors — asking simple questions about parenting, time spent with his child, and day-to-day involvement. But instead of clear answers, his responses drift into unrelated stories, deflections, and repeated attempts to shift blame.
In Michigan, custody decisions are based on the “best interests of the child,” a set of legal factors that evaluate parenting ability, stability, judgment, and each parent’s willingness to support the child’s relationship with the other parent.
As the hearing continues, a pattern starts to form.
All suspects are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. All crimes are alleged until a court or regulatory agency finds otherwise. These are not high-profile cases and the defendants are not public figures, please enjoy responsibly.
This channel does not provide legal advice. All commentary is speculative and all opinions are my own.
This video may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyrighted holder(s), but I believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine under section 107 of the US copyright law.
#courtcam #courtcam #peoplescourt #courtroomdrama #zoomcourt #courtlive court show, #judgeboyd #justice #familycourt #custody #divorce #contemptofcourt
20 Comments
Also the judge needs to say "this is a hearing, not a conversation. Stop interrupting!"
My head is spinning just listening to him but I must say, there’s so many dam fathers out there that don’t want to fight to see their child.
People in Court: This is actually a custody case.
Me: Life in jail!!
He’s the worst! 😬😬😬
If you can’t even behave in court, I definitely wouldn’t want him around that five-year-old child!!!🤨 He really seems unstable!!! Please get to help you so desperately need so you could possibly be a father to your son!!🙏🙏🙏🙏 For goodness sake, shut your mouth, man!!!!!🤐🤐🤐 I’ve changed my mind this child not should not be subjected to this man he’s nuts!!!! he’s not
Entitled Father Back in Court Demanding Unsupervised Custody
People in Court After Dark
1,036 views
Entitled father returns to family court demanding custody despite ongoing concerns about his behavior and judgment.
Pro se custody case highlighting courtroom behavior, parental responsibility, and how judges evaluate the best interests of the child.
LINK TO PART 1: Father Demands Unsupervised Custody — Then...
Welcome to People In Court After Dark! I'm so glad you're here. Let's watch...
In a previous hearing, this father appeared by Zoom demanding unsupervised parenting time — but the hearing was cut short after he revealed he was in an inpatient facility and began making statements that raised serious concerns.
Now he’s back.
The judge works through the standard custody factors — asking simple questions about parenting, time spent with his child, and day-to-day involvement. But instead of clear answers, his responses drift into unrelated stories, deflections, and repeated attempts to shift blame.
In Michigan, custody decisions are based on the “best interests of the child,” a set of legal factors that evaluate parenting ability, stability, judgment, and each parent’s willingness to support the child’s relationship with the other parent.
As the hearing continues, a pattern starts to form.
All suspects are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. All crimes are alleged until a court or regulatory agency finds otherwise. These are not high-profile cases and the defendants are not public figures, please enjoy responsibly.
This channel does not provide legal advice. All commentary is speculative and all opinions are my own.
This video may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyrighted holder(s), but I believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine under section 107 of the US copyright law.
#courtcam #courtcam #peoplescourt #courtroomdrama #zoomcourt #courtlive court show, #judgeboyd #justice #familycourt #custody #divorce #contemptofcourt