English subtitles are available.
In this video I respond to the worst video essay ever made, ''The Lost Soul Arts of Demon's Souls'' by Matthewmatosis, in which he argues that Dark Souls 1, Dark Souls 2, Dark Souls 3 and Bloodborne are bad sequels to Demon's Souls, which was the only truly unique and innovative game of the souls series. If you want to see my previous response to Matthew, ''All Dark Souls 2 critiques are SLOP.'' (A response to his ''Dark Souls 2 Critique''): Dark Souls 2 critiques are SLOP.
Thank you for watching! If you want to support my work, and get access to a substack-like blog in which I write about the Bible, the esoteric world, and analyze other fictional works, including movies, music clips and etc., you can check out my Patreon: Patreon: membership
Timestamps:
0:00 - 1:40 Introduction
1:41 - 11:48 Matthew is a bad and/or dishonest critic
11:49 - 23:57 ''Only Demon's Souls was innovative''
23:58 - 26:26 ''Only Demon's Souls has many unique bosses'' (Prelude)
26:27 - 31:08 ''There is nothing remarkable about Dark Souls' combat''
31:09 - 33:14 ''Bloodborne's RPG mechanics are useless''
33:15 - 40:51 ''Bloodborne/Souls combat is below that of basic action games''
40:52 - 41:41 ''Weapon Arts destroy the grounded aesthetic''
41:42 - 44:47 ''Souls combat is just about rolling and attacking''
44:48 - 54:37 ''Non-puzzle bosses are generic at best and terrible at worst''
54:38 - 57:09 ''Only Demon's Souls was risky and experimental''
57:10 - 1:00:13 ''I could just play a better action game instead''
1:00:14 - 1:02:59 ''Only Demon's Souls has traps and area gimmicks''
1:03:00 - 1:08:14 ''Only Demon's Souls is immersive and has unique areas''
1:08:15 - 1:18:47 ''Only Demon's Souls has unique bosses'' (Again)
1:18:48 - 1:35:54 (Nitpicks and falsehoods)
1:35:55 - 1:40:17 ''Dark Souls and Bloodborne are bad sequels''
English subtitles are available.
In this video I respond to the worst video essay ever made, ''The Lost Soul Arts of Demon's Souls'' by Matthewmatosis, in which he argues that Dark Souls 1, Dark Souls 2, Dark Souls 3 and Bloodborne are bad sequels to Demon's Souls, which was the only truly unique and innovative game of the souls series. If you want to see my previous response to Matthew, ''All Dark Souls 2 critiques are SLOP.'' (A response to his ''Dark Souls 2 Critique''): Dark Souls 2 critiques are SLOP.
Thank you for watching! If you want to support my work, and get access to a substack-like blog in which I write about the Bible, the esoteric world, and analyze other fictional works, including movies, music clips and etc., you can check out my Patreon: Patreon: membership
Timestamps:
0:00 - 1:40 Introduction
1:41 - 11:48 Matthew is a bad and/or dishonest critic
11:49 - 23:57 ''Only Demon's Souls was innovative''
23:58 - 26:26 ''Only Demon's Souls has many unique bosses'' (Prelude)
26:27 - 31:08 ''There is nothing remarkable about Dark Souls' combat''
31:09 - 33:14 ''Bloodborne's RPG mechanics are useless''
33:15 - 40:51 ''Bloodborne/Souls combat is below that of basic action games''
40:52 - 41:41 ''Weapon Arts destroy the grounded aesthetic''
41:42 - 44:47 ''Souls combat is just about rolling and attacking''
44:48 - 54:37 ''Non-puzzle bosses are generic at best and terrible at worst''
54:38 - 57:09 ''Only Demon's Souls was risky and experimental''
57:10 - 1:00:13 ''I could just play a better action game instead''
1:00:14 - 1:02:59 ''Only Demon's Souls has traps and area gimmicks''
1:03:00 - 1:08:14 ''Only Demon's Souls is immersive and has unique areas''
1:08:15 - 1:18:47 ''Only Demon's Souls has unique bosses'' (Again)
1:18:48 - 1:35:54 (Nitpicks and falsehoods)
1:35:55 - 1:40:17 ''Dark Souls and Bloodborne are bad sequels''
In this video I respond to the worst video essay ever made, ''The Lost Soul Arts of Demon's Souls'' by Matthewmatosis, in which he argues that Dark Souls 1, Dark Souls 2, Dark Souls 3 and Bloodborne are bad sequels to Demon's Souls, which was the only truly unique and innovative game of the souls series. If you want to see my previous response to Matthew, ''All Dark Souls 2 critiques are SLOP.'' (A response to his ''Dark Souls 2 Critique''): https://youtu.be/bWiccoRo-mg
Thank you for watching! If you want to support my work, and get access to a substack-like blog in which I write about the Bible, the esoteric world, and analyze other fictional works, including movies, music clips and etc., you can check out my Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/c/thefirelinkconspiracy/membership
Timestamps:
0:00 - 1:40 Introduction
1:41 - 11:48 Matthew is a bad and/or dishonest critic
11:49 - 23:57 ''Only Demon's Souls was innovative''
23:58 - 26:26 ''Only Demon's Souls has many unique bosses'' (Prelude)
26:27 - 31:08 ''There is nothing remarkable about Dark Souls' combat''
31:09 - 33:14 ''Bloodborne's RPG mechanics are useless''
33:15 - 40:51 ''Bloodborne/Souls combat is below that of basic action games''
40:52 - 41:41 ''Weapon Arts destroy the grounded aesthetic''
41:42 - 44:47 ''Souls combat is just about rolling and attacking''
44:48 - 54:37 ''Non-puzzle bosses are generic at best and terrible at worst''
54:38 - 57:09 ''Only Demon's Souls was risky and experimental''
57:10 - 1:00:13 ''I could just play a better action game instead''
1:00:14 - 1:02:59 ''Only Demon's Souls has traps and area gimmicks''
1:03:00 - 1:08:14 ''Only Demon's Souls is immersive and has unique areas''
1:08:15 - 1:18:47 ''Only Demon's Souls has unique bosses'' (Again)
1:18:48 - 1:35:54 (Nitpicks and falsehoods)
1:35:55 - 1:40:17 ''Dark Souls and Bloodborne are bad sequels''