I have been an enormous admirer of both Sontag and Berger for many years. Sontag was a veritable obsession for me when I was in college--I read everything I could find by or about her. I've even read her posthumously published journals and notebooks, which are, in my estimation, her finest writing (which is ironic, because she never planned for anyone to see them). One thing I've noticed in this discussion with John Berger (whom I also admire) that I never noticed before and which sheds some light on several aspects of Sontag's work (and, indeed, her life), is that she is an incredibly literal-minded person--she takes things for their propositional value, rather than for their associational intensity. Makes one wonder why she became a literary artist rather than an analytic philosopher.
2 years ago I sided with the facts of Susan, now I side with the truths of John. But thinking and feeling make a hell of a team! Thanks to all people involved in the creation of this beautiful piece of humanity, I will come back in the years to come.
By the way, if anyone knows of any other conversation like this one, please tell.
Berger might as well have written "Ways of Listening"... He is one of the most profound listeners I've ever witnessed. I've never seen a listener better able to bring out the best in a discussant. See his conversation, too , with Michael Silverblatt.
Best opening sequence ever. The world has moved on since then, today we 're trapped in our media hacked fragmented narrations but a lot here, remains relevant. Not sure what tho. People had a lot more time then. It wasn't so urgent to be incredibly precise and fast. This was all before Matrix!
Susan: I disagree.