Is it basically the same as what the church did to the bibles 😊

Only Allah swt knows who is Kafir or not no one has any Authority to say he is kafir .

Assalam wa Aleikum brother.  As usual, fantastic presentation.  Thank you 🤲

these mushriqs are unbearable with their incompetent thinking.. shame... La MINDOONILAH

Sabr and truth is with those who follow the word of Allah and do not mix the Truth with falsehood. First they mocked us, then they laughed at us now they're admitting we're a problem that needs to be solved. But every accusation against us is an admission from themselves. Who can say following Allah alone is folly other than one who fools himself. Peace.

this statement nailed it "to rely on other men on the concept of the unseen"

There was something similar to Nicean Creed though may be not as formal, for example under the Seljuk Uzir Nizam-ul-mulk there was canonization of Shahi Bukhari and Shahi Muslim. Until then only Shafi Madhab considered  Shahi Bukhary and Shahi Muslim authentic. However under the influence and direction from Nizam-ul-Mulk the Maliki's and Handball schools came to an agreement to accept those two Hadith books as authentic in 12th  century (that's  500-600 years after prophet's demise). For Hanafis it took 2 more centuries (14th) to accept those 2 Hadith collections as authentic. Just like the Nicean Creed (priests and Emperor Constantine) , ruling class and priestly class collaborated in canonization of Shahi Bukhary and Shahi Muslim.

Regarding A, B and C.   Firstly, I strongly believe it's A, not C. 😅

But jokes apart, the fact is that if we can see clear contradictions despite the "sahih" sanad, then obviously at least one or few out of all the "sahih" narrators were NOT as reliable/trustworthy as they thought..  and NAK lowkey acknowledges this.. what I don't understand is, how can they trust any hadith as reliable then without knowing who the liar is? Let alone ascribing it to the Prophet (saw) claiming "Prophet said so". .. even the good hadiths, it's difficult to assert with surety Prophet (saw) said this.  Maybe for the true mass transmitted mutawattur hadiths (which are just handful unfortunately) that 100% align perfectly with the Qur'an, I could be fairly confident, but still not in the verbatim sense.  

I've narrowed down the problem for the more intellectual and honest Sunni's:  Just because they cannot find a good counter answer to "where else does rakaat", "salaat ritual", "salaat sequence". etc come from, they feel obliged to accept the entirety of hadiths ! Wholesale ! 🤦🏻.. despite those "missing" extracurricular ritual details only comprise 1% of the entire hadith collection.. So why not just take the 1% (the applied sunnah) and leave the rest as historical records instead of calling it a religious text ?

The truth is, none of them ever counted how many hadiths actually "explain" the Qur'an, they are a LOT fewer than they think.

14:00 i completely agree with NAK on this point.

15:00 there is a saying i've once heard and it goes like this "10 million people believing the earth is a square doesn't qualify it as a truth"
Even with massive amounts of people passing down something, it doesn't make it true or in the case of religion, doesn't make it needed or true, I agree with you!

Quran talk about salat in a much vast sense beside ritual salat. My understanding of aqeem us salat is to practically apply in our lives the action or deeds which Allaha wants us to adopt. As  far rituals of Salat concern they r not fixed. Evan the Prophet was told  something like not to overdo it. Need some thoughts on it.

Surah Al-Baqarah (2:83): Commands believers to "speak good words to people".

Very enlightening discussion.

16:00
the report scattered everywhere yet only the Persian collect it?

Hadith was invented to divide Muslims and keep us away from Quran. Quran makes life easy and Hadith is the opposite

I am Sunni but have this question

How can Allah justly make disbelief the consequence of rejecting something that was never established to me with certainty, when the thing I am certain of the Qur’an is itself clear about Allah’s justice and not burdening people beyond their capacity?

Those who divid the region and rejoice in them I .e Sunni ,Shia,hamadya, and others

Brilliant closing 🤣

As for the number of rak'ahs*—had God prescribed this in the Quran, we would have been compelled to regard it as paramount. We would have spent our prayers obsessively counting—meticulously, intensely, and with focused concentration—for the number itself would have become sacred, essential, and vital simply by virtue of being mentioned in the Quran. In the process, the spirit of *khushu' (humble reverence) would have been lost, as would the joy and spiritual benefit of the bowing (*ruku'*). Yet, this is precisely the effect that the ancillary rules of prayer have had; one might find a person crowding his feet against yours, for to him, prayer is merely about "closing the gaps" rather than achieving humble reverence. The Quran is Wise; it understands the volatility and inner turmoil of the human soul—and that is precisely why it did not specify the number.

Take, for instance, the story of the Cow: God commanded the slaughter of a cow, yet the people imposed upon themselves a specific type of cow that was virtually non-existent. Similarly, consider wudu (ablution) as prescribed in the Quran—how simple it is—whereas wudu outside the Quran is incredibly difficult.

People believe in hear say , inherited region, not reflecting upon the Qur'an