Who do you think won the debate?

Sig won in my opinion because there's no way agen could avoid admitting 2 natures after the union, qualitatively or quantitatively, which at that point just accept chalcedon😂

Win for Chalcedon ❤️☦️

What’s up with all the agen glazers in the comments? I’ve seen some Christological debates and this one goes to the Chalcedonians, agen kept strawmanning everything and quote-mining. Kind of crazy if your theology is based on misunderstanding something on purpose and creating a different religion based on your own interpretation of patristics 😂 that’s what papists do.

agen admitted 2 natures like 100 times, w siig w chalcedon

We gotta pray for this brother. Many of us used to be of such ways, until we came to know of Holy Orthodoxy ☦️

Complete and total Miaphysite victory.

The more agen asking siig the more siig sounds like nestorian..

SIIIG for the W

Modern dialogue between the Coptic and Eastern Orthodox Churches has found that both sides affirm the same rejection of confusion and separation; much of the historical dispute involved terminology and how particular formulas were understood.

Great debate

Great Debate

Agen as usual on 🔥🔥🔥🔥

36:04

Read letter 44.

"For we, when asserting their union, confess one Christ, one Son, the one and same Lord, and finally we confess the one incarnate nature of God. "

6:48 agen lost here, he admitted the 2 natures are retained in the sets of characteristics after the union

SIIIG is goated, another dub for chalcedon🎉

Jesús is One with the Father; and we should ALL be One in Our Lord Jesus Christ

SIIIG didn’t have the guts to answer a single question directly, instead repeatedly resorting to the “I don’t know what you mean by that” card. Genuine disagreement requires not only understanding your opponent’s argument but also being able to articulate it accurately and explain why it is logically flawed—something Agen did very effectively. Claiming not to understand the words or the argument is an admission of confusion or lack of knowledge, not a convincing defense of your position.

Wow