I hate when I see a nerdy, lanky, socially awkward guy character that I like a lot suddenly become an "attractive" man with abs and a chiseled jaw line and NO GLASSES THE REST WOULD BE ALMOST OK IF YOU JUST KEEP THE GLASSES PLEASEEEEEE (The one exception to this trope I've seen is Milo from Atlantis: The Lost Empire who stayed his nerdy lanky self throughout the movie and still got the girl in the end I love him he is best boy)

10:30 There actually is a reason for this one besides "laziness".  In 2D animated works, the backgrounds are usually painted by a different team than character animation.  Since TV productions are especially limited on time and money, everyone's work is simplified as much as possible -- which for character animators is a clean flatly-colored style that's relatively easy to keep on-model, while for background illustrators it's a quick and not-very-refined painted style.  As a result there's almost always some stylistic discrepancy between the characters and the background of a scene.  

Making matters even worse is that even though both teams work off the same concept art and storyboards, they often don't have direct access to the other team's work.  To use the screenshot at 10:40 as an example, the backgrounds team likely couldn't just look at the character animation team's work to match the stuffed animals in the background to the one Steven interacts with; depending on how tight the production timeline is they might not have seen it until after the final cut of the episode was locked in.

Two of my nitpicks are:

- A character shoves a minuscule crumb of bread into their mouth, but their cheeks swell like they have just eaten a whole Bic Mac and they even chew with difficulty.

- A character like Donald Duck, who only wears a t-shirt, but when he is naked he covers his crotch instead.

2 tropes that I really dislike are:
1- when characters have asymmetrical designs and when they face another direction their design gets flipped (specially when it comes to hair). I know it helps with recognizing silhouette but I don't care.
2- cc chests no matter how loose and/or thick the clothing is. That's simply not how a fabric works on a woman's chest and seeing women (or worse: girls) drawn like this in animated shows/movies that were supposed to be for children just makes me uncomfortable since I was a child even when famous paintings with nude women didn't.

I think the more egregious variant of the "Child looks exactly like parent" trope is when you have an interracial/inter-species couple and the children then look exactly like one parent and not a fusion of both. ie: In Treasure Planet, a Dog man marries a Cat girl and then their sons look like dogs while their daughters look like cats.

8:51
THANK YOU! Unless them looking like one their parents is an important plot point (like Harry Potter looking so much like James that Snape is unable to see Lilly in him and it adds to his mistreatment of Harry) I HATE this trope.

Genetics is fascinating and I like it when a child looks like a blend of their parents.

one of my biggest gripes is how sometimes a male animal will look like a normal animal but the female one will have an accentuated waist, boobs, unrealistically long eyelashes and maybe in some cases even make up

The unieye on Sonic doesnt really annoy me because, well Sonic, Amy, Tails, theyre animals yes, but they are also ALIENS. So i just think that their species evolved differently to us and thats it. Makes it so simple really.

As a Sonic fan, I've stared at Sonic characters for so long that I don't find them weird looking. Even the way they wink looks normal to me.

On 4. South Park actually did a joke where a police sketch artist sketched the kids and showed them to their parents, it was hyper realistic, and the parents agreed they looked like their kids, but that they see horribly drawn 🤣🤣🤣

6. I’ve seen kids who look just like a single,e parent, it’s freaky!! >_>

7. JUSTICE JAW CELESTIA IS QUEEN! AND I WISH TO SEE MORE OF HER!!!

I feel bullied by the Sonic one, as a Sonic fan

The "interactable item" looking different is usually because the background is drawn in one style while the animation is drawn in another style so the the item is drawn in the animation style because it will be animated.

I learned about it way back in the Tom and Jerry days, with cell animation it was basically a necessity. It was a fun thing to notice for an animation fan like myself as a kid.

Fun video! I'd love to see more silly videos like this in the future especially if they give you a break from more serious videos.

10:29 Gigachaddess Celestia

I honestly love how Dogman makes fun of the child being a tiny version of the parent trope by having Petey make a clone of himself that ends up being the child version of him. So he literally makes a tiny clone of himself and ends up having to be the father of the tiny clone lol.

Also chubby girls are extremely beautiful too we need more chubby girl appreciation in media >:(

One thing that kinda bothers me is when it comes to anthro animals, the world isn't consistent with the dress code. Sometimes males will wear no clothes or just a shirt whereas females always have a full outfit. Gumball actually poked fun at this in an episode where they acknowledge that the universe's dress code makes no sense. And I love Ducktales, but I think some of those birds should be wearing pants. At least with Bluey, most characters don't wear clothes unless they have some sort of profession, like being a doctor or working at a store. Also, another thing, drawing animal characters without tails is something that bothers me as well.

One of my biggest pet-peeves in Western cartoon is when any animal or non-human characters just run around naked.

Like... Sure they have fur but... Wha-?

It gets even worse when side characters who are also non-human show up and DO wear clothes, by that only the main character is naked and I'm not okay with it.

As a Sonic fan I respect your opinion about the eyes. Even though I don’t agree with you, I personally think it’s fun to have different views on something we both love. Art! It gives us a way to see different sides of the coin. I enjoyed the video all the same. ❤️🎨🖌️

11:03 its job isn't to tell you "hey, this is a thing you should look at" its because its super hard to animate something with the level of detail and softness the background typically has! it is very much just to ease workload on animators without making the scene unreadable

“Bean-heads are considered lazy” meanwhile circle-heads exist without the same complaints

Duchess Celestia : “When a character looks so much like one of their parents that they’re practically identical.”

Me looking exactly like my mom : 🧍