OpenTube

Barrie Schwortz: "The NEW DNA Results Are In — What We Found on the Shroud of Turin Is Impossible"

Discovery Quest

13,955 views

Barrie Schwortz: "The NEW DNA Results Are In — What We Found on the Shroud of Turin Is Impossible"

New DNA results connected to the Shroud of Turin are raising fresh questions about one of history’s most mysterious artifacts. Barrie Schwortz discusses the latest findings, the evidence researchers have examined, and why some of the results are being described as extraordinary.

In this video, we explore the DNA evidence, the history of the Shroud, scientific investigations, and the unanswered questions surrounding its mysterious origins. Could these new findings change what we know about the Shroud of Turin?

Watch until the end as we examine the evidence, the claims, and what the latest research could mean.

Disclaimer: This video discusses historical and scientific claims for informational and entertainment purposes. Some interpretations remain disputed, and the findings should not be treated as definitive proof without independent scientific verification.

#ShroudOfTurin #BarrieSchwortz #DNAResults #ShroudOfTurinDNA #AncientMysteries #Archaeology #History #Science #BiblicalHistory #Mystery #AncientHistory #Jesus #HistoricalMysteries #NewDiscovery #ScientificDiscovery

20 Comments

@johnmcginley8310 1 day ago

R.I.P: Barrie. God bless you for your work.
Your legacy is honest and (still) requiring of scientific explanation.✝

@steinfranken1108 18 hours ago

They did studies on the plant DNA, but what of a study of the DNA from the blood on the shroud? That has to be one of the most important pieces of evidence and it goes unmentioned. Very surprised and disappointed.

@thomasbrookes2266 6 days ago

there will be some out there who will be pulling their hair out because of the results, but you cannot go against scientific fact,,there is always some grounded reason for anything other worldly or supernatural, fact,

@davidcinson3527 7 days ago

Ye of "LITTLE FAITH "

@Joyce-f7j8d 16 hours ago

Do sensible people reject God because of SCIENCE? You can believe in both. Science and God. God created everything that exists and gave it order. Science is the study of the order. Science can never replace God. It is illgocial.

@howdydoodey3872 19 hours ago

Far too much time is spent on a Christ link.
The cloth is not 2000 years old - QED.

@JohnHart-d3q 5 days ago

Until we have cracked cell regeneration and live cell manipulation, you will not understand how the form of what had been upon the skin of Jesus Christ was transferred onto the inside of the shroud, and not so much on the bottom wrap which should shown more, beam me up Boss, comes to mind, our technology has still not caught up with the Gods, one day science might show us the truth..

@gknight4719 1 day ago

Lets say its true, then why would god leave such sneaky hard to find evidence of
its existence, when it could just turn up and say hello, and very few would go to hell.

@ThomasORourke-v7v 3 days ago

The documented history of the shroud dates back to 1354, when it began to be exhibited in the new collegiate church of Lirey, a village in north-central France. The shroud was denounced as a forgery by the bishop of Troyes, Pierre d'Arcis, in 1389. The microscopist and forensic expert Walter McCrone found, based on his examination of samples taken in 1978 from the surface of the shroud using adhesive tape, that the image on the shroud had been painted with a dilute solution of red ochre pigment in a gelatin medium. McCrone also found that the apparent bloodstains were painted with vermilion pigment, also in a gelatin medium.

@lisanewton3154 6 days ago

Jesus Christ Is Lord ❤❤❤

@jameslovell8682 1 day ago

Ai SLOP

@ErvinDavisKB1TLD 7 days ago

Yeah, in your face doesn't prove you owning either.

@SafariCat-d5v 8 days ago

Every church had a sideshow that they charged people money to see, a shroud a chair that Jesus sat in or Jesus’s shoes. What ever they could dream up. They even sold pieces of the cross and Jesus finger bones. The original grift. How do you explain where they got all the money for cathedrals and massive vanity projects.

@JennyB-oj6sk 5 days ago

That shroud could have been anyone. It was not Jesus who was crucified but some poor person gathered up by the friends of Jesus. The fellow on the cross cried out (Father they have go the wrong man) He called to HIS father. That is why Mary saw Jesus in the garden later on and hence the myth of the rising of the dead, These stories were written my Luke 70 years after the death of Jesus.

@Joyce-f7j8d 16 hours ago

You are being dishonest just to get people to watch your video. I have already seen and knew these things. Don't lie to get hits.

@freightdog132 10 days ago

The shroud was from a different body. It was proven about 3 years ago.

@BrownBrown20-p9z 5 days ago

TRUE BELIEVERS do NOT need proof! And for nonbelievers NO PROOF IS ENOUGH! I was SAVED before I ever read the Bible. WHEN U KNOW U KNOW! I DO NOT BELIEVE 100% IN EVERY STORY IN THE BIBLE BECAUSE IT WAS WRITTEN BY MAN. BUT I ABSOLUTELY 100% BELIEVE IN MY LORD AND SAVIOR JESUS CHRIST!!!