Reason I enjoyed this conversation was we were authentic and honest. Also one  common thing about us was we both had blocked nose that day. Thanks for having me. Keep it up!

I put this podcast on thinking I’d eventually fall asleep to it, but it ended up holding my attention all the way through

This is one of the best podcasts. A host talking about hosting with the fellow host.

It was like reading an underrated book!!!

Was a riveting 1:14:31  podcast.🍀
Thanks to u both!!

Really enjoyed this flow of conversation between the two podcast hosts. It’s truly fascinating to learn the art of questioning and that of listening from the perspective of Mr. Lungleng who’s doing a commendable job as the host of his show. Kudos to the two of you, keep it up! Always a joy to listen to you both. 🙌🙌

Good conversation, worth watching!

New subscriber here from senapati

This episode was very interesting and full of insightful information. Thank you!

Very informative and strong word sir lunglang keep on casting podcasting the truth and nothing more than that God bless

Amazing two personalities.

Another wow episode ❤❤❤❤

...really enjoyed watching this podcast 😍🙏👍👍🙏👊..

New subscribers swu world vlogs

New subscriber frm lungleng show

The interviewer needs to speak louder and vivid like Lunglen... Woah . Woooahh... It's like you're mumbling

Lungleng Sir is already in Winter 😂

Apart from the block nose for both, which sounded funny, this is a boring conversation because it's all about what its about in journalism ...

I think he(Lungleng) makes a really strong point about how the Dunning-Kruger effect stifles progress in our society—specifically that idea that unchallenged minds become 'boastful' and that we need to actively seek out truth rather than stay in a comfort zone. He's right that 'neutrality' often just means refusing to call out what is wrong.

However, I’d argue there’s a major flaw in how he defines 'truth' itself. He keeps framing objective truth as something that aligns perfectly with his Christian values and his own interpretation of the facts. When he dismisses postmodernism or LGBTQ+ perspectives as just 'subjective opinions' while positioning his own view as 'objective,' he’s actually creating a bias rather than solving it.

If the goal is to truly destroy the Dunning-Kruger effect, we can’t just have one person—no matter how 'thick-skinned' they are—decide what the truth is. True critical thinking means accepting that 'truth' is often contested and that even the most well-intentioned host can be wrong. Otherwise, we’re just swapping one form of ignorance (thinking we know everything) for another (thinking only we know the truth). Therefore, he himself shows the tendencies of the Dunning-Kruger effect.

Awo lung y just??

Lunglang  learn some vocabulary from him.. It's important not as you think😂