Ha, this speaks to the wonderful game of chess that DOESN'T get played... he spends 20 minutes talking about a possible line with all kinds of really cool fun stuff that he didn't end up playing. I remembered that from my games... I'd play OTB and go home and go over it and think "is that all there was?" because the UNPLAYED game was so much bigger than the played game.
what a gentleman, to annotate one of his losses with such clarity and patience and even apparent enjoyment. Just brilliant. Glad you made it to the Candidates' Matches, Yaz! You deserved it. Sorry you didn't win and get to challenge GK.
I really enjoyed all of your lectures and if you read this one a day I really want to say you are awesome . In fact I'm from Egypt and I got those amazing lectures very helpful thank you Mr Seirawan
That a knight becomes more powerful the more it is supported by your other pieces is such a valuable lesson, i on my own would have never figured that out, i definately try to adapt this knowledge into my own games.
Missed this video on publication date, and just now watching. TY for a fascinating 41 minutes. Watched it straight through. As I recall GM Robert Byrne was the chess columnist for the NYT in those days. Can we hang the flawed analysis on his door?