Pierre Bourdieu - Entretiens (A Voix nue)
Artesquieu
23,768 views
Après la publication de Choses dites, où Pierre Bourdieu s'interrogeait sur cette parole particulière qu'est l'entretien, il semblait naturel qu'il nous fasse saisir à voix nue ce que parler veut dire. Entretiens avec Roger Chartier sur France Culture (1988)
18 Comments
@JoyeuxBordel2026 2 years ago
France Culture la radio de la bourgeoisie dominante...Merci à Bourdieu !
@bernadettelarregola7151 2 years ago
Pourquoi ces commentaires en anglais ?
Pierre Bourdieu, un homme admirable qui nous manque.
Pierre Bourdieu, un homme admirable qui nous manque.
@IKnowNeonLights 3 years ago
This means from that point on the Sunday second of July, a sunny day, two thousand and twenty three, and over sixty minutes past the middle of the day, all what I had complet confidence and confirmed belief as being human behaviour changed it's existence in being anything else but belief, confirmed and confident. From that point on, a voice, a laughter, a greeting, a warning, a cry, age, race, religion and gender took the shape of a structure I could never think, let alone believe to be real, the structure I refer to is known as the (the boy that cried wolf to many times) which is exactly what happened, with the truly unknown strange, increasing in structure by being exactly what happened to the people in and around the event before, during and after while consciously and unconsciously crying wolf, until the wolf did come, for everyone, as it always does, it just simply has not sunk in yet.
What is more of an increase in complet unknown strange, has to do with the fact of me having been sitting for a few days right next to barbeque equipment, at a cafe shop I usually frequent, before and after the event unfolding, and now while stuck with my personal has not sunk in yet feeling, the structure I have just described, there seems to be nothing strange about it, in the form of a most simple foundational structure, and from what I can understand now, a most sudden and extremely violent manifestation of it is known as human stampe, a black Friday sale, or a pandemic supermarket run, more or less a obliviously unknown casual externality of direct or indirect harm, violence all the way to deaths, by anyone for anyone and anywhere as we the people delivered always through a myriad of most beneficial and useful human acts, which means Jesus is right just as the gospels describe, (all will rise against all).
And now I understand, I understand because I was not born in money, and by that I mean high levels of privacy, I was born in public, a public hospital, with and within a public health system, public schools, public streets, public playgrounds, a public small town, if and when any private areas existed, these areas were very small and very much part of a public construct by tradition and culture. This upbringing has installed with and within me the indisputable fact of human beings making the public, the public I was born in and grew up, a fact which I have used throughout my life as reality no matter with and within all places I have lived, until that Sunday second of July, a sunny day, two thousand and twenty three, and over sixty minutes past the middle of the day. That moment which has not sunk in yet turned on the light's on this undisputable fact which I have held throughout my life as a consequence of being born as, and reminded me that it has been under attack in all directions for all of my life, during my education, during any learning I have undertaken, conversations, readings etc etc. Such attacks are some of the most formidable theories and proven facts, completely undermining and challenging this belief, the indisputable fact I have held, I still hold, (until I don't know when) because as things stand, I will either change my beliefs, or another moment similar or exactly the same, as that Sunday second of July, a sunny day, two thousand and twenty three, and over sixty minutes past the middle of the day, will. These theories and facts show clearly with and within many instances and cases, through experiment's and statistics, that of which I hold as a public including myself made of human beings is not, instead all including myself are a species, a word which has a undividable of equal terms for any other species of the animal world.
This has built health systems, education systems, cultural systems, political and judiciary systems, technological systems, even religious systems with and within whole state structures, and all the human beings which with and within my indisputable fact and belief made the public, are not considered so, but most importantly factually, theoretical and statistically proven not be so. So here I am on that Sunday second of July, a sunny day, two thousand and twenty three, and over sixty minutes past the middle of the day, again and again and again....and something crucial and extremely important has changed, my indisputable held fact of always listening to human beings is not valid and most certainly not useful anymore, instead all what the theories together with their undisputable facts and statistics which have attacked my beliefs as a consequence of being born in public as public, and a human being, hold more weight and certainly seem to be more useful. Which in the case described here, would mean way more attention to any danger presented as not danger, through the none existent cloak of being human, by any species described and explained by the best scientific research, evidence and theories.
What is more of an increase in complet unknown strange, has to do with the fact of me having been sitting for a few days right next to barbeque equipment, at a cafe shop I usually frequent, before and after the event unfolding, and now while stuck with my personal has not sunk in yet feeling, the structure I have just described, there seems to be nothing strange about it, in the form of a most simple foundational structure, and from what I can understand now, a most sudden and extremely violent manifestation of it is known as human stampe, a black Friday sale, or a pandemic supermarket run, more or less a obliviously unknown casual externality of direct or indirect harm, violence all the way to deaths, by anyone for anyone and anywhere as we the people delivered always through a myriad of most beneficial and useful human acts, which means Jesus is right just as the gospels describe, (all will rise against all).
And now I understand, I understand because I was not born in money, and by that I mean high levels of privacy, I was born in public, a public hospital, with and within a public health system, public schools, public streets, public playgrounds, a public small town, if and when any private areas existed, these areas were very small and very much part of a public construct by tradition and culture. This upbringing has installed with and within me the indisputable fact of human beings making the public, the public I was born in and grew up, a fact which I have used throughout my life as reality no matter with and within all places I have lived, until that Sunday second of July, a sunny day, two thousand and twenty three, and over sixty minutes past the middle of the day. That moment which has not sunk in yet turned on the light's on this undisputable fact which I have held throughout my life as a consequence of being born as, and reminded me that it has been under attack in all directions for all of my life, during my education, during any learning I have undertaken, conversations, readings etc etc. Such attacks are some of the most formidable theories and proven facts, completely undermining and challenging this belief, the indisputable fact I have held, I still hold, (until I don't know when) because as things stand, I will either change my beliefs, or another moment similar or exactly the same, as that Sunday second of July, a sunny day, two thousand and twenty three, and over sixty minutes past the middle of the day, will. These theories and facts show clearly with and within many instances and cases, through experiment's and statistics, that of which I hold as a public including myself made of human beings is not, instead all including myself are a species, a word which has a undividable of equal terms for any other species of the animal world.
This has built health systems, education systems, cultural systems, political and judiciary systems, technological systems, even religious systems with and within whole state structures, and all the human beings which with and within my indisputable fact and belief made the public, are not considered so, but most importantly factually, theoretical and statistically proven not be so. So here I am on that Sunday second of July, a sunny day, two thousand and twenty three, and over sixty minutes past the middle of the day, again and again and again....and something crucial and extremely important has changed, my indisputable held fact of always listening to human beings is not valid and most certainly not useful anymore, instead all what the theories together with their undisputable facts and statistics which have attacked my beliefs as a consequence of being born in public as public, and a human being, hold more weight and certainly seem to be more useful. Which in the case described here, would mean way more attention to any danger presented as not danger, through the none existent cloak of being human, by any species described and explained by the best scientific research, evidence and theories.
@IKnowNeonLights 3 years ago
Kä, Ki, Ka, Ku, Ke, Ko, Kë are all questions in a most formidable and extreme simplicity parallel structure of being as not language or mathematics which are a literal direct attribute and can only exist from two language words such as Ka, Ka. The two words which are exactly the same in writing and pronunciation mean an adult bull (Ka), and there (is) as in the present (Ka). The question words deriving from the two language words refer to questions such as (as who) (have what) (where/direction) (where/static) ( be where as past/present and future), (with and within who) simultaneously and as a literal sentence with and within a huge amount of possible combinations. I know also because it is language, all of the syllables referred here are present in almost any language on planet earth, exactly or more or less with and within the same definitions, usage and meanings. More importantly because it is language, anyone can literally develop a new language at will and without much difficulties simply using the two words and the questions derived from the two words.
Such power is with and within language, that all that exists as a totality of the entire human civilization is a direct and constant attribute of some very formidable language and mathematics constructs, which are at the civilisations detriment if and when reduced to some far distant archaic and simplistic words or even worst sounds, through a most formidably wrong method of questions and answers which are always simplistic, not words and mainly sounds. It seems that I have neglected examples for mathematics, and that is a question with an answer, on the other hand as presented here, mathematics exactly as with language is always true. Meaning (The me, does not ask, the here, and the mountain, in order to prove, the me, the here and the mountain, nor any combinations of or it's totality, it simply is true with and within all cases) questions that can derive from such a structure, do so for an answer, and the answer is simply that, the result of the question.
There is even more than (me here mountain) language structure, and that is what I am after. First I will say a truth anyone needs to be aware of and it is this {{{{No human being will be with and within heavens without language.}}}} Be anyone that has the most prayers, the most miracles, the most good deeds, or the most holy holiness, nothing except language. Now some examples of more than (me here mountain) language sentences.....(Antelope me here mountain) (river here mountain me stone) (me here sun) (sun stars universe here) ...... Such still very simple language examples are completely ignored and often considered as none existent by anyone, simply because each structure makes, initiates, develops, and enacts some of the most formidable in structure questions in existence always parallel to language, questions that enable anyone to simply begin from it as a point of awareness ignoring and neglecting language or mathematics as start. One of the most important questions deriving from language is known among many as (time) making it a one way direction only, as a default of its construct in the form of a question and not language or mathematics.
This malfunction with and within anyone gives rise to a wrong approach in understanding being, it gives rise to a structure of questions and answers which indicates any achievement made by anyone is reached so only through constantly questioning any and all possible combinations while receiving answers and choosing among such the correct or incorrect one, giving in turn a result of being, one which is always relatable and only relatable neither true or false. In fact all that is achieved by anyone is always through language, without any questions as a total absolute first. This neglected and ignored structure because of its simple undisputable power, comes right away with and within anyone as it's own true being once all of the questions have reached their end, and especially once there are no more questions to make, initiate, develop or enact, at this instance all becomes one as is, the (me) the (here) the (mountain) .....etc etc until a new question arises with and within each point only because of being one, with its new answers, triggering time as quickly as it can arise, which is very very quick, for many (human beings living as actual questions constantly) as quickly as the speed of light or consciousness.
((((This totally neglected and ignored structure of being, is known and understood by many names, the most simple one takes the form of a sentence, such as {just sitting there/here doing nothing} with the doing nothing in most cases refering literally to that, or quite a lot of thinking, depending on the human being and the language structure available to the human being. The most complex ones are known as {dau} {meditation} and a third which I consider the most complex of all, first written in what is recognised as ancient greek language known as {Jesus went/goes away to pray} sentence. Knowing (Jesus), knowing (went/go), knowing (away) and knowing (pray), once anyone is with and within each point of such a sentence as one, the complexity of the structure is a true complexity, which with and within it's original writing makes the word complex unusable and irrelevant. The simple form together with the complex ones, depending on the human being reach instances that are so quick where no questions can be, and being human being applicable only, while not much of language use is among human beings, only interval manifestations are available, with and within anyone. For some, these intervals are longer then others, for some these intervals are themselves, for some these intervals are a complete blank, and depending on the human being these intervals can lead to a allegorical petrifying while being alive, scientific, technological, artistic, or philosophical breakthroughs, all the way to a literal, cultural and civilization change including religion .))))
So powerful it is as a structure that billions of human beings day by day live upon, simply using it parallel or with and within many combinations of questions and answers, passing whole life's without using any language at all. If it was otherwise, then no human beings would exist, simply animals having no desire other than what is on earth in terms of senses would instead. Only by having (me) that is (here) and the (mountain) simultaneously as one, yet each distinctive with and within a language structure, can any and all possible combinations of questions be made, initiated, developed and enacted with and within each or as a totality, once no more questions are for each point the (me) the (here) the (mountain), then anyone has no choice but to be the (me), the (here), the (mountain) simultaneously as one, again and again and again until there is no need for it, meaning anyone without language cannot be with and within heavens under no circumstances, be such the holy holiest of all circumstances.
I have used (if and when) very often while writing this explanation, and it is precisely because the if and when, are the actual method which anyone bypasses language, ignoring and neglecting its being to maintain a structure of questions and answers continuously for everything. That is achieved as simply as stating (if mountain so and so and so then/when) (if and when me here so and so and so then/when) .....and on and on, presenting a indefinable start as definable, making in turn everything that which is parallel to language presented as language, yet is not language, exactly the same with mathematics. Making, initiating, developing, enacting questions and answers that once complexity is achieved, very hard to distinguish between each, which makes everything true and false simultaneously and always relatable, with the language form always being with and within anyone right when no questions can be, which is so quick that makes anyone oblivious to it's existence, especially (if) and (when) questions and answers are anyone's total existence (then).
The if and when as a start over language structure is the most dangerous structure to be, a structure that is destroyed always no matter. Is important because any questions or answers together with a if and when gives only the parallel of what anyone is and as consequence knows as is, giving anyone a mismatch/error upon (me here Zeus) or ( me here nature) even (me here clever) sentence which is not language, yet presented as language....etc etc because language is and it's parallel is not, simply is only that, it's parallel in the form of a question or answer as a question and an answer.
Such power is with and within language, that all that exists as a totality of the entire human civilization is a direct and constant attribute of some very formidable language and mathematics constructs, which are at the civilisations detriment if and when reduced to some far distant archaic and simplistic words or even worst sounds, through a most formidably wrong method of questions and answers which are always simplistic, not words and mainly sounds. It seems that I have neglected examples for mathematics, and that is a question with an answer, on the other hand as presented here, mathematics exactly as with language is always true. Meaning (The me, does not ask, the here, and the mountain, in order to prove, the me, the here and the mountain, nor any combinations of or it's totality, it simply is true with and within all cases) questions that can derive from such a structure, do so for an answer, and the answer is simply that, the result of the question.
There is even more than (me here mountain) language structure, and that is what I am after. First I will say a truth anyone needs to be aware of and it is this {{{{No human being will be with and within heavens without language.}}}} Be anyone that has the most prayers, the most miracles, the most good deeds, or the most holy holiness, nothing except language. Now some examples of more than (me here mountain) language sentences.....(Antelope me here mountain) (river here mountain me stone) (me here sun) (sun stars universe here) ...... Such still very simple language examples are completely ignored and often considered as none existent by anyone, simply because each structure makes, initiates, develops, and enacts some of the most formidable in structure questions in existence always parallel to language, questions that enable anyone to simply begin from it as a point of awareness ignoring and neglecting language or mathematics as start. One of the most important questions deriving from language is known among many as (time) making it a one way direction only, as a default of its construct in the form of a question and not language or mathematics.
This malfunction with and within anyone gives rise to a wrong approach in understanding being, it gives rise to a structure of questions and answers which indicates any achievement made by anyone is reached so only through constantly questioning any and all possible combinations while receiving answers and choosing among such the correct or incorrect one, giving in turn a result of being, one which is always relatable and only relatable neither true or false. In fact all that is achieved by anyone is always through language, without any questions as a total absolute first. This neglected and ignored structure because of its simple undisputable power, comes right away with and within anyone as it's own true being once all of the questions have reached their end, and especially once there are no more questions to make, initiate, develop or enact, at this instance all becomes one as is, the (me) the (here) the (mountain) .....etc etc until a new question arises with and within each point only because of being one, with its new answers, triggering time as quickly as it can arise, which is very very quick, for many (human beings living as actual questions constantly) as quickly as the speed of light or consciousness.
((((This totally neglected and ignored structure of being, is known and understood by many names, the most simple one takes the form of a sentence, such as {just sitting there/here doing nothing} with the doing nothing in most cases refering literally to that, or quite a lot of thinking, depending on the human being and the language structure available to the human being. The most complex ones are known as {dau} {meditation} and a third which I consider the most complex of all, first written in what is recognised as ancient greek language known as {Jesus went/goes away to pray} sentence. Knowing (Jesus), knowing (went/go), knowing (away) and knowing (pray), once anyone is with and within each point of such a sentence as one, the complexity of the structure is a true complexity, which with and within it's original writing makes the word complex unusable and irrelevant. The simple form together with the complex ones, depending on the human being reach instances that are so quick where no questions can be, and being human being applicable only, while not much of language use is among human beings, only interval manifestations are available, with and within anyone. For some, these intervals are longer then others, for some these intervals are themselves, for some these intervals are a complete blank, and depending on the human being these intervals can lead to a allegorical petrifying while being alive, scientific, technological, artistic, or philosophical breakthroughs, all the way to a literal, cultural and civilization change including religion .))))
So powerful it is as a structure that billions of human beings day by day live upon, simply using it parallel or with and within many combinations of questions and answers, passing whole life's without using any language at all. If it was otherwise, then no human beings would exist, simply animals having no desire other than what is on earth in terms of senses would instead. Only by having (me) that is (here) and the (mountain) simultaneously as one, yet each distinctive with and within a language structure, can any and all possible combinations of questions be made, initiated, developed and enacted with and within each or as a totality, once no more questions are for each point the (me) the (here) the (mountain), then anyone has no choice but to be the (me), the (here), the (mountain) simultaneously as one, again and again and again until there is no need for it, meaning anyone without language cannot be with and within heavens under no circumstances, be such the holy holiest of all circumstances.
I have used (if and when) very often while writing this explanation, and it is precisely because the if and when, are the actual method which anyone bypasses language, ignoring and neglecting its being to maintain a structure of questions and answers continuously for everything. That is achieved as simply as stating (if mountain so and so and so then/when) (if and when me here so and so and so then/when) .....and on and on, presenting a indefinable start as definable, making in turn everything that which is parallel to language presented as language, yet is not language, exactly the same with mathematics. Making, initiating, developing, enacting questions and answers that once complexity is achieved, very hard to distinguish between each, which makes everything true and false simultaneously and always relatable, with the language form always being with and within anyone right when no questions can be, which is so quick that makes anyone oblivious to it's existence, especially (if) and (when) questions and answers are anyone's total existence (then).
The if and when as a start over language structure is the most dangerous structure to be, a structure that is destroyed always no matter. Is important because any questions or answers together with a if and when gives only the parallel of what anyone is and as consequence knows as is, giving anyone a mismatch/error upon (me here Zeus) or ( me here nature) even (me here clever) sentence which is not language, yet presented as language....etc etc because language is and it's parallel is not, simply is only that, it's parallel in the form of a question or answer as a question and an answer.
@IKnowNeonLights 3 years ago
It is hard to understand, but based on this description then the (if) is a direct attribute of language as space, meaning the (me), while the (when) is a direct attribute of language as time, meaning the (here), which can easily apply for the (mountain) etc etc..... simply by saying the same exact thing as (then) (also) etc etc . This question and answer structure has enormous benefits, it also has enormous destruction as a direct default of its parallel existence to language and mathematics and it is that which I am after. The true origins of the (if) and the (when) derived straight away from language ignoring and neglecting language as a consequence, as a beneficial and destructive attribute other than the obvious structure explained here of a question and answer one, are literally the most written, talked about, learned, taught, applied and a functional process to be with and within all of the civilisation, it is very hard to point at any aspect of civilization which is not built upon it, and this precise location is known as biology, more precisely genes, genomes, eugenics, race etc etc. Not as the many highly complex (if's) and (when's) that can derived from, but as it's core foundation, a foundation which has begun thousands of measures ago, making its undisputed evidence of its level of complexity as the very now, the moment all civilisation exist, including all of its mathematically calculable numbers. It is none other than the being of a human being male and a human being female, which through the structure of the (if) and (when) are given the attribute of the first human being male and the first human being female, making as a consequence a answer as a third human being which is male or female according to the structure began as the (if) and the (when) of the first human being male and the first human being female. Based on the explanation presented here, that of this type of structure being always a attribute parallel to language and mathematics, in the form of a question and answer while not being either language or mathematics, It is very hard to find any structure which is not based on this, be such a structure presented as physics, chemistry, mathematics, biology, technology, artisanship, architecture, astrology, religion, philosophy, culture, race, language, sports, including time and space which is what the structure uses to be beneficial and destructive.
It is a most obvious choice, simply based on statistical probabilities. In taking a start (a male human being) as a point in being, a statistical probability is the answer. In taking a start (a male human being), and another point (a female human being), as a string of points in being, a statistical probability is the answer. In taking a start (a male human being), and a point (a female human being), and the answer (a female or male child human being) to each being (the male and the female human beings), as a string of points in being, a statistical probability is the answer, and on and on and on, making, initiating developing and enacting what could be presented as a infinity of statistical probabilities in being as answers to questions and questions to answer or answers to answers and questions to questions and on and on. The benefits of this are enormous, the destruction is equal with a difference, the destruction applies not only to the structure but to begin, simply because the structure is it's parallel. Nothing sinister or a concept known as the punishment from God, despite the rumours, God is not that, simply a choice taken as simple as the (if) and the (when) with and within any being. It's start is it's own end, once a complex structure is equal as a consequence of its start, the start and the end will become exactly the same structure, no matter. And any being, being so through the structure, will be no more, while being not so through such a structure, will simply be. What is more, the structure in all the civilisations aspects explains itself exactly, and any being upon such a structure can see exactly what the structure says about itself, holding time the (when), space the (if) etc etc ..... together with the speed of light as a consolation talisman. Well....the structure itself argues the talisman is not that much of a consolation nor even a talisman as language and mathematics.
[{\|/ What is faster than the "speed" of "light"? I don't know! I "also" don't know! I bet you are going to tell "us"! Of course I am! You are my mind, and you are my brain. And you are.......!? "I" "am" "language". !!!......
The speed of light is faster than the speed of light. "If" "where" "when" "how" the speed of light is, gets with and within there is "it", the speed of light is already there.
If not....! "You" "mind" "and" "you" brain" "drop" "the" "case".\|/}]
It's beginning as of thousands of measures ago is what gives the current complexity present, a complexity which is accelerating through all of its available combinations, and any belief such complexity can be controlled in any other way, by anyone, being as a consequence of it as a structure, is not fully conscious of the structure. On simple biological terms a one start will go with and within as many other starts until it is one again, and by being a (if) and (when) start as of thousands of measures ago the complexity becoming as one again can actually be sensed yet not understood as that.
It is a most obvious choice, simply based on statistical probabilities. In taking a start (a male human being) as a point in being, a statistical probability is the answer. In taking a start (a male human being), and another point (a female human being), as a string of points in being, a statistical probability is the answer. In taking a start (a male human being), and a point (a female human being), and the answer (a female or male child human being) to each being (the male and the female human beings), as a string of points in being, a statistical probability is the answer, and on and on and on, making, initiating developing and enacting what could be presented as a infinity of statistical probabilities in being as answers to questions and questions to answer or answers to answers and questions to questions and on and on. The benefits of this are enormous, the destruction is equal with a difference, the destruction applies not only to the structure but to begin, simply because the structure is it's parallel. Nothing sinister or a concept known as the punishment from God, despite the rumours, God is not that, simply a choice taken as simple as the (if) and the (when) with and within any being. It's start is it's own end, once a complex structure is equal as a consequence of its start, the start and the end will become exactly the same structure, no matter. And any being, being so through the structure, will be no more, while being not so through such a structure, will simply be. What is more, the structure in all the civilisations aspects explains itself exactly, and any being upon such a structure can see exactly what the structure says about itself, holding time the (when), space the (if) etc etc ..... together with the speed of light as a consolation talisman. Well....the structure itself argues the talisman is not that much of a consolation nor even a talisman as language and mathematics.
[{\|/ What is faster than the "speed" of "light"? I don't know! I "also" don't know! I bet you are going to tell "us"! Of course I am! You are my mind, and you are my brain. And you are.......!? "I" "am" "language". !!!......
The speed of light is faster than the speed of light. "If" "where" "when" "how" the speed of light is, gets with and within there is "it", the speed of light is already there.
If not....! "You" "mind" "and" "you" brain" "drop" "the" "case".\|/}]
It's beginning as of thousands of measures ago is what gives the current complexity present, a complexity which is accelerating through all of its available combinations, and any belief such complexity can be controlled in any other way, by anyone, being as a consequence of it as a structure, is not fully conscious of the structure. On simple biological terms a one start will go with and within as many other starts until it is one again, and by being a (if) and (when) start as of thousands of measures ago the complexity becoming as one again can actually be sensed yet not understood as that.
@IKnowNeonLights 3 years ago
At this point of being, many would wrongly ask, or wrongly state and by wrongly doing so with and within either case turn a state into a question and a question into a state, (What is language?) and..., (No explanation of what language is...!) is presented here. And I could stop right at the end of this very sentence emphasising the paragraph preceding it and say, think or write no more, being fully content with and within language. Yet being by now not interested on that anymore say, think and write more I am, making (a why not) neither wrongly stated or even a question.
I wrote this as a comment to a linguistics academic which I respect just in case he passes away being that he is very old, not because he is right on any of the work undertaken with and within linguistics, but because it seems that he intentionally, has covered everything through the most vague theoretical structures available, about linguistics, developing in turn a most horrifying mine field for anyone else that attempts to walk through it, having as a backup one of the most formidable technologies currently available, known as all of computer and digital technology. Making language impossible to tell, while it's non language parallel a actual reality used by almost anyone anywhere on the planet, and what I wrote is this.
[{\|/ What is faster than the "speed" of "light"? I don't know! I "also" don't know! I bet you are going to tell "us"! Of course I am! You are my mind, and you are my brain. And you are.......!? "I" "am" "language". !!!......
The speed of light is faster than the speed of light. "If" "where" "when" "how" the speed of light is, gets with and within there is "it", the speed of light is already there.
If not....! "You" "mind" "and" "you" brain" "drop" "the" "case".\|/}]
From these string of sentences which I wrote as a comment just in case.....a only and only structure in being exists, this structure is language, it's parallel which is not language can only exist as a attributed consequence of its existence first. What clearly separates language from its parallel that is not is this. In language there is no question, in any language currently existing, to have been or to be, there is no question. Another structure exactly the same as language that has no question is mathematics. In all of mathematics currently existing, to have been or to be, there is no question. Simply put there cannot be a question in language, if there is then there cannot be existence, nothing is true, exactly the same in mathematics. A question, any question can only have an answer, and an answer any answer is neither true or false, it simply is an answer to a question. As things currently stand the highest percentage of the planets life operates through what is not language nor mathematics, simply through answers to questions, that of which is a parallel to language and can only exist as a consequential attribute to a language foundation.
Human beings have language because human beings are not the best at making, initiating, developing and enacting questions, human beings are pretty good at it, but not the best by far. Human beings are not the best at receiving answers either, not at considerable fluctuating volumes, various amounts, different speeds, frequencies, or spectrums. We have language and a considerably powerful (depending on its language foundation) not a language parallel structure to go with. For example bat's and dolphins are possibly two of the most formidable form's of life on planet earth which are able to make, initiate, develop and enact questions which would make human beings look like stones if and when compared, on top of that both bats and dolphins can receive answers with often extreme considerable fluctuating volumes, various amounts, different speeds, sound frequencies, and spectrums of light. Bats and dolphins don't have language, instead a often maximum use of what is not mathematics but it's parallel construction is made use of, and in the case of bats being bats and dolphins dolphins, a best use of. Which means for both bats and dolphins nothing is true or false, everything is simply an answer, which is why both bats and dolphins have to continuously keep the question and answer process going through out all of their existence, no matter how many times it has been carried. This will upset many "people", but anyone should take relief in knowing how upset are bats and dolphins for not having a language, any language.
Most of scientific structure is based on this function of a question and answer, evolution is successfully reasond in this method, general relativity is successfully reasond in this method, even quantum mechanics is reasoned in this method, all of philosophy and religion (except philosophy and religion) is reasoned in this method, and as a consequence of....all of the culture resulting in a total form of the world's civilization is reasoned in this method. Making in the process everything neither true or false, which would in turn make anything true or false upon the answer to a question. This can only be achieved by what is not language or mathematics. In the case of not mathematics, the best way is known as calculus, calculus is not mathematics, is simply the best method of making, initiating, developing and enacting questions, it's also the best method of receiving answers at considerable fluctuating volumes, various amounts, different speeds, frequencies, or spectrums, which is why nothing can be proven true or false.
With and within each instance a question is put forward, an answer will derive from that question, making any animal as similar as the answer is, to any human being no matter, making any point of view relative to any of that point of view no matter, making all possible philosophies and religion derive from such a method true and false simultaneously no matter, building as a consequence a very real civilization structure that is real but cannot be proven so. Except one extremely important difference..... each of such very successful methods exist only as a parallel attribute to what is language and mathematics, which with and within each construct no question exists even in the cases where it appears to be exactly that, and that is the exception unfortunately, because as of now, so much is built upon a question and answer process, that most of the structure as fact is so complex through a built on method upon a question of a question to a question to a question to a question as a or the actual answer simultaneously, that in some very often cases is impossible to distinguish or even figure out which is the question and which is the answer.
This has been possible by a very simple misrepresentation of what thinking is, with and within anyone for quite a far back in terms of a measured period. Thinking is simply the best hypothetical location where a question is made, initiated, developed and enacted, together with an answer received at considerable fluctuating volumes, various amounts, different speeds, frequencies, or spectrums and the brain deal's with the literal processing of the whole method as a step by step process. Often referred as the mind, and there is no absolute language or mathematics in any thinking, the mind or the brain, each equivalent parallel to language and mathematics, yes, that there is and constantly, whereas language and mathematics only make the most instant appearance physically and non physically through a manifestation in the brain, thinking or mind, to be substituted as quickly as the most instant appearance by each of its non language and mathematics parallel structure which operate best through a question and answer way.
Two human beings next to eachother, and one says.... {Me here mountain} using language. (Me) refers to the speaking human being, both together, or the other. (Me) refers also to here, together with and within the speaking human being, both together or the other. (Me) refers also to the mountain, together with and within here, the speaking human being, both together, or the other. The exact structural attributes are valid for (here) and (mountain) simultaneously as are with (me), all in and as one, yet each point is present separately also. Language like that means all, without such a structure as a foundation no question can be, and by that default no answer can be, not a relative one, not a quantum mechanics one, nor a philosophical one, yet the language has all and more with and within it's structure simultaneously. If the two human beings are in and as one through language, meaning with and within (me) (here) (mountain) simultaneously then no absolute question will exist between both, the here and the mountain, only the being with and within and according each point simultaneously. If not then one of the points represented as one totality is not that which it presents/say's, which means a question is presented, either by the speaking human being, the other, the here or the mountain, this if not structure is always a attribute parallel of language always being first. A human being can simply say....(I have been to that mountain) and that would be automatically only a question, never language nor mathematics.
I wrote this as a comment to a linguistics academic which I respect just in case he passes away being that he is very old, not because he is right on any of the work undertaken with and within linguistics, but because it seems that he intentionally, has covered everything through the most vague theoretical structures available, about linguistics, developing in turn a most horrifying mine field for anyone else that attempts to walk through it, having as a backup one of the most formidable technologies currently available, known as all of computer and digital technology. Making language impossible to tell, while it's non language parallel a actual reality used by almost anyone anywhere on the planet, and what I wrote is this.
[{\|/ What is faster than the "speed" of "light"? I don't know! I "also" don't know! I bet you are going to tell "us"! Of course I am! You are my mind, and you are my brain. And you are.......!? "I" "am" "language". !!!......
The speed of light is faster than the speed of light. "If" "where" "when" "how" the speed of light is, gets with and within there is "it", the speed of light is already there.
If not....! "You" "mind" "and" "you" brain" "drop" "the" "case".\|/}]
From these string of sentences which I wrote as a comment just in case.....a only and only structure in being exists, this structure is language, it's parallel which is not language can only exist as a attributed consequence of its existence first. What clearly separates language from its parallel that is not is this. In language there is no question, in any language currently existing, to have been or to be, there is no question. Another structure exactly the same as language that has no question is mathematics. In all of mathematics currently existing, to have been or to be, there is no question. Simply put there cannot be a question in language, if there is then there cannot be existence, nothing is true, exactly the same in mathematics. A question, any question can only have an answer, and an answer any answer is neither true or false, it simply is an answer to a question. As things currently stand the highest percentage of the planets life operates through what is not language nor mathematics, simply through answers to questions, that of which is a parallel to language and can only exist as a consequential attribute to a language foundation.
Human beings have language because human beings are not the best at making, initiating, developing and enacting questions, human beings are pretty good at it, but not the best by far. Human beings are not the best at receiving answers either, not at considerable fluctuating volumes, various amounts, different speeds, frequencies, or spectrums. We have language and a considerably powerful (depending on its language foundation) not a language parallel structure to go with. For example bat's and dolphins are possibly two of the most formidable form's of life on planet earth which are able to make, initiate, develop and enact questions which would make human beings look like stones if and when compared, on top of that both bats and dolphins can receive answers with often extreme considerable fluctuating volumes, various amounts, different speeds, sound frequencies, and spectrums of light. Bats and dolphins don't have language, instead a often maximum use of what is not mathematics but it's parallel construction is made use of, and in the case of bats being bats and dolphins dolphins, a best use of. Which means for both bats and dolphins nothing is true or false, everything is simply an answer, which is why both bats and dolphins have to continuously keep the question and answer process going through out all of their existence, no matter how many times it has been carried. This will upset many "people", but anyone should take relief in knowing how upset are bats and dolphins for not having a language, any language.
Most of scientific structure is based on this function of a question and answer, evolution is successfully reasond in this method, general relativity is successfully reasond in this method, even quantum mechanics is reasoned in this method, all of philosophy and religion (except philosophy and religion) is reasoned in this method, and as a consequence of....all of the culture resulting in a total form of the world's civilization is reasoned in this method. Making in the process everything neither true or false, which would in turn make anything true or false upon the answer to a question. This can only be achieved by what is not language or mathematics. In the case of not mathematics, the best way is known as calculus, calculus is not mathematics, is simply the best method of making, initiating, developing and enacting questions, it's also the best method of receiving answers at considerable fluctuating volumes, various amounts, different speeds, frequencies, or spectrums, which is why nothing can be proven true or false.
With and within each instance a question is put forward, an answer will derive from that question, making any animal as similar as the answer is, to any human being no matter, making any point of view relative to any of that point of view no matter, making all possible philosophies and religion derive from such a method true and false simultaneously no matter, building as a consequence a very real civilization structure that is real but cannot be proven so. Except one extremely important difference..... each of such very successful methods exist only as a parallel attribute to what is language and mathematics, which with and within each construct no question exists even in the cases where it appears to be exactly that, and that is the exception unfortunately, because as of now, so much is built upon a question and answer process, that most of the structure as fact is so complex through a built on method upon a question of a question to a question to a question to a question as a or the actual answer simultaneously, that in some very often cases is impossible to distinguish or even figure out which is the question and which is the answer.
This has been possible by a very simple misrepresentation of what thinking is, with and within anyone for quite a far back in terms of a measured period. Thinking is simply the best hypothetical location where a question is made, initiated, developed and enacted, together with an answer received at considerable fluctuating volumes, various amounts, different speeds, frequencies, or spectrums and the brain deal's with the literal processing of the whole method as a step by step process. Often referred as the mind, and there is no absolute language or mathematics in any thinking, the mind or the brain, each equivalent parallel to language and mathematics, yes, that there is and constantly, whereas language and mathematics only make the most instant appearance physically and non physically through a manifestation in the brain, thinking or mind, to be substituted as quickly as the most instant appearance by each of its non language and mathematics parallel structure which operate best through a question and answer way.
Two human beings next to eachother, and one says.... {Me here mountain} using language. (Me) refers to the speaking human being, both together, or the other. (Me) refers also to here, together with and within the speaking human being, both together or the other. (Me) refers also to the mountain, together with and within here, the speaking human being, both together, or the other. The exact structural attributes are valid for (here) and (mountain) simultaneously as are with (me), all in and as one, yet each point is present separately also. Language like that means all, without such a structure as a foundation no question can be, and by that default no answer can be, not a relative one, not a quantum mechanics one, nor a philosophical one, yet the language has all and more with and within it's structure simultaneously. If the two human beings are in and as one through language, meaning with and within (me) (here) (mountain) simultaneously then no absolute question will exist between both, the here and the mountain, only the being with and within and according each point simultaneously. If not then one of the points represented as one totality is not that which it presents/say's, which means a question is presented, either by the speaking human being, the other, the here or the mountain, this if not structure is always a attribute parallel of language always being first. A human being can simply say....(I have been to that mountain) and that would be automatically only a question, never language nor mathematics.
@IKnowNeonLights 3 years ago
Sunday second of July, a sunny day, two thousand and twenty three, and over sixty minutes past the middle of the day. At this very precise point, and round about twenty four hours past it, a sentence that I had never truly contemplated it's meaning began to sink with and within my whole existence, physically and non physically simultaneously. What made the sinking in attribute, together with the feeling, coming and by then a completely unavoidable existence, from all possible directions, even more intense is the very linguistic construction of the sentence, describing word for word what I was enthralled with and within feeling physically and not, by and of the consequence of it very meaning as a linguistic structure. The sentence that had begun to sink in at that very precise point, stated very clearly and in all possible ways here, it, has not stopped sinking since, as if there is no end to the depth it aims.
(Wait a moment because It has not sunk in yet.) Is the sentence I am referring to. I had heard this sentence before in England, but I had never been able to make one single use of it, and when I heard it used as casual as a greeting at many instances, I truly questioned the ability to have had any understanding of the words and of the sentence, by any of it's users. Now I find myself not as lucky as the previous forty two years of not having had any possibility to truly make use of such a linguistic structure, finding myself with all the sinking of the sentence and it's precise point, as it's beginning stated here, precipitating still and continuously, as a true sinking does towards a depth with no end.
The whole event giving birth to the sentence, a sentence that matches word for word to the very physical and non physical being, during, before and after the event, is as strange and it's meanings can be, a completely and truly unknown. This type of structure (a completely and truly unknown) is extremely hard to achieve for any event, sentence or being, yet what I will attempt to describe here does exactly that, it does so through what is, and in most cases at the highest possible probability, strange through all possible generalities, keeping itself as a truly unknown strange, right and completely hidden among all that is or becomes not strange for and by all possible reasons, which upon understanding from anyone it leaves no other choice but to begin it's sinking as a linguistic structure and as a form of being with and within anyone, to a depth with no end.
So let me begin with the stranges that are not so. The whole event revolves around a fire and there is nothing strange about a fire. A building on fire and there is nothing strange about a building on fire. An apartment building on fire and there is nothing strange about an apartment building on fire. Two families with very young children and possibly five young adults together with one middle aged adult living at the apartment building, and there is nothing strange about families with young children, young adults or adults living in a apartment building on fire. A accidental fire, and there is nothing strange about a accidental fire. A intentional act of starting a fire, and there is nothing strange about a intentional act of starting a fire. A fire started by young person, a old person, a group etc etc.....and there is nothing strange about that. A fire started out of anger, hate, violence, ignorance, stupidity, vengeance, job, etc etc or a complet indifferent why not, and there is nothing strange about anger, hate, violence, ignorance, stupidity, vengeance, job etc etc, or complete indifferent why not starting any fire. A fire started out of a conflict, war or a most necessary action, and there is nothing strange about a conflict, war or necessary action starting any fire. A fire that given the right conditions would involve as many buildings, apartments, families, children and adults, it's conditions would make available, and there is nothing strange about that. A fire that is reached on the right period and at the right conditions together with the right methods to deal with, by purposely trained personnel, and there is nothing strange about that. A fire that is not reached on, at the right period, at the right conditions together with the right methods to deal with, and by not so trained personnel, and there is nothing strange about that either. A adult having been inside the apartment building when the fire began and having exited the building safely watching from outside, and there is nothing strange about that. That very adult watching others watching the fire, and there is nothing strange about that. That adult watching the other people that lived at the building by now partly on fire out safely, and there is nothing strange about that. That adult watching the people in and around together with complete strangers watching him and the fire, filming him and the fire, taking pictures of him and the fire ......, and there is nothing strange about that. That adult watching people involved in taking and giving all possible emotions and feelings from the event, including bewilderment, pleasure, amaziment, fun, curiosity, ridicule, possible sadness and fear, and there is nothing strange about that.
Almost all that is strange and not, simultaneously, with and within many cases happened that very Sunday second of July, a sunny day, two thousand and twenty three, and over sixty minutes past the middle of the day, and by having been surpassed by what is truly strange, {the complete unknown}, to me until that very moment, something that has not sunk in yet, but it continues to do so as if there is no end to it's depth, is what makes it, the very sentence structure that describes word for word itself, as a undeniable form of being truly strange, and it is precisely that which I aim to describe.
The truly unknown strange, had begun way before the actual event described here and it involves what in any billion measures, anyone cannot pinpoint it as being that, a truly unknown strange, something which upon contact and understanding takes the form of (it has not sunk in yet) language structure continuously. For days, weeks and months before the event, a intentional and most common behaviour, loaded with extreme linear and nonlinear pointless attributes, was constantly active in and around the building, and there is nothing strange especially about that. Such behaviour involved anyone as a human being, from children, young, adults and old, male and female, with a diverse combinations of cultures, involving different languages, It involved laughter, argument, shouting, crying, ridicule, swearing, curse and blessings among much much more, more or less all that is and can be human as a behaviour life structure was part of it, and there is nothing strange about that either.
The truly unknown involved in me considering all of this behaviour as that of which it presented itself (human), and by doing so involving myself to completely ignore it, if and when it did not involve me, which was close to one hundred percent with and within each instance, by the default of not knowing any of the people and there is nothing strange about that either, yet the strange, the truly unknown manifested itself, that very Sunday second of July, a sunny day, two thousand and twenty three, and over sixty minutes past the middle of the day, with and within exactly the same behaviour, as a structure and as being a reality, by the same people, with the same sounds, the same language and acts. The very behaviour that I had involved myself in completely ignoring it, if and when it did not involve me, at that Sunday second of July, a sunny day, two thousand and twenty three, and over sixty minutes past the middle of the day involved in signalling a fire, a building on fire, an apartment building on fire, which if I had not had the ability to smell, together with the smoke from the fire and the right conditions involving the right trained personnel reaching it and me on time, I would have ignored it long enough, if and when the conditions for long enough would have meant extreme danger for existence as a life form. All because there is nothing strange about ignoring and not ignoring human behaviour, if and when it does not involve the self existence of anyone.
(Wait a moment because It has not sunk in yet.) Is the sentence I am referring to. I had heard this sentence before in England, but I had never been able to make one single use of it, and when I heard it used as casual as a greeting at many instances, I truly questioned the ability to have had any understanding of the words and of the sentence, by any of it's users. Now I find myself not as lucky as the previous forty two years of not having had any possibility to truly make use of such a linguistic structure, finding myself with all the sinking of the sentence and it's precise point, as it's beginning stated here, precipitating still and continuously, as a true sinking does towards a depth with no end.
The whole event giving birth to the sentence, a sentence that matches word for word to the very physical and non physical being, during, before and after the event, is as strange and it's meanings can be, a completely and truly unknown. This type of structure (a completely and truly unknown) is extremely hard to achieve for any event, sentence or being, yet what I will attempt to describe here does exactly that, it does so through what is, and in most cases at the highest possible probability, strange through all possible generalities, keeping itself as a truly unknown strange, right and completely hidden among all that is or becomes not strange for and by all possible reasons, which upon understanding from anyone it leaves no other choice but to begin it's sinking as a linguistic structure and as a form of being with and within anyone, to a depth with no end.
So let me begin with the stranges that are not so. The whole event revolves around a fire and there is nothing strange about a fire. A building on fire and there is nothing strange about a building on fire. An apartment building on fire and there is nothing strange about an apartment building on fire. Two families with very young children and possibly five young adults together with one middle aged adult living at the apartment building, and there is nothing strange about families with young children, young adults or adults living in a apartment building on fire. A accidental fire, and there is nothing strange about a accidental fire. A intentional act of starting a fire, and there is nothing strange about a intentional act of starting a fire. A fire started by young person, a old person, a group etc etc.....and there is nothing strange about that. A fire started out of anger, hate, violence, ignorance, stupidity, vengeance, job, etc etc or a complet indifferent why not, and there is nothing strange about anger, hate, violence, ignorance, stupidity, vengeance, job etc etc, or complete indifferent why not starting any fire. A fire started out of a conflict, war or a most necessary action, and there is nothing strange about a conflict, war or necessary action starting any fire. A fire that given the right conditions would involve as many buildings, apartments, families, children and adults, it's conditions would make available, and there is nothing strange about that. A fire that is reached on the right period and at the right conditions together with the right methods to deal with, by purposely trained personnel, and there is nothing strange about that. A fire that is not reached on, at the right period, at the right conditions together with the right methods to deal with, and by not so trained personnel, and there is nothing strange about that either. A adult having been inside the apartment building when the fire began and having exited the building safely watching from outside, and there is nothing strange about that. That very adult watching others watching the fire, and there is nothing strange about that. That adult watching the other people that lived at the building by now partly on fire out safely, and there is nothing strange about that. That adult watching the people in and around together with complete strangers watching him and the fire, filming him and the fire, taking pictures of him and the fire ......, and there is nothing strange about that. That adult watching people involved in taking and giving all possible emotions and feelings from the event, including bewilderment, pleasure, amaziment, fun, curiosity, ridicule, possible sadness and fear, and there is nothing strange about that.
Almost all that is strange and not, simultaneously, with and within many cases happened that very Sunday second of July, a sunny day, two thousand and twenty three, and over sixty minutes past the middle of the day, and by having been surpassed by what is truly strange, {the complete unknown}, to me until that very moment, something that has not sunk in yet, but it continues to do so as if there is no end to it's depth, is what makes it, the very sentence structure that describes word for word itself, as a undeniable form of being truly strange, and it is precisely that which I aim to describe.
The truly unknown strange, had begun way before the actual event described here and it involves what in any billion measures, anyone cannot pinpoint it as being that, a truly unknown strange, something which upon contact and understanding takes the form of (it has not sunk in yet) language structure continuously. For days, weeks and months before the event, a intentional and most common behaviour, loaded with extreme linear and nonlinear pointless attributes, was constantly active in and around the building, and there is nothing strange especially about that. Such behaviour involved anyone as a human being, from children, young, adults and old, male and female, with a diverse combinations of cultures, involving different languages, It involved laughter, argument, shouting, crying, ridicule, swearing, curse and blessings among much much more, more or less all that is and can be human as a behaviour life structure was part of it, and there is nothing strange about that either.
The truly unknown involved in me considering all of this behaviour as that of which it presented itself (human), and by doing so involving myself to completely ignore it, if and when it did not involve me, which was close to one hundred percent with and within each instance, by the default of not knowing any of the people and there is nothing strange about that either, yet the strange, the truly unknown manifested itself, that very Sunday second of July, a sunny day, two thousand and twenty three, and over sixty minutes past the middle of the day, with and within exactly the same behaviour, as a structure and as being a reality, by the same people, with the same sounds, the same language and acts. The very behaviour that I had involved myself in completely ignoring it, if and when it did not involve me, at that Sunday second of July, a sunny day, two thousand and twenty three, and over sixty minutes past the middle of the day involved in signalling a fire, a building on fire, an apartment building on fire, which if I had not had the ability to smell, together with the smoke from the fire and the right conditions involving the right trained personnel reaching it and me on time, I would have ignored it long enough, if and when the conditions for long enough would have meant extreme danger for existence as a life form. All because there is nothing strange about ignoring and not ignoring human behaviour, if and when it does not involve the self existence of anyone.
@IKnowNeonLights 3 years ago
Making for a problem upon the usage of the word (my) as a concept of ownership, belonging possession etc etc, simply because the connection to it's language primary origin is not fallowed or is interrupted as with the case of English, whereas with the other examples is simply not fallowed, yet with every instance the respective word is used to infer to the (my) concept as ownership, belonging, possession etc etc, the language structural form play's a conscious and a none conscious important effect simply by remaining as a language structure, even if the usage might not be intended as that. Based in this explanation it is very hard for anyone to use the (my) word as a concept of ownership, belonging, possession etc etc, because as soon as it is applied to any language structure, it as concept and as a none language structural parallel to language falls apart. If it does not with a simple example as (my mother), it certainly does with an equally simple example as (my father), which means that it should also fall apart with any other simple examples such as (my children) (my city) (my country) (my family) (my God) (my thoughts) (my soul) (my way) more or less (my anything or anyone), even literal physical objects are as (my) as (my) can hold including its very (my) existence in the example of a life span (my life). It can be argued otherwise by many, and by many it most certainly is not even a argument, which means that anyone does or does not claim ownership, belonging, possession etc etc to anything or anyone upon the correct or incorrect usage of the (my) as a word and concept.
This is where the concept of love, fall's appart if and when used as (my love), meaning something which cannot be owned is given to someone else, which cannot own it either, in return for something which they do not own, to be given back to that someone which cannot own it either way. Taking the example of (mother)..... I do not love my mother, because of a (my) concept of ownership, belonging, possession etc etc instead the love is with and within the (io, ein, on, je etc ... original primary language structure) meaning anyone and their mother are one (as the self), a begining (as either point) and always on (as a start in all directions) no matter. With and within such language as structure, good or bad has nothing to do with it, because it initiates, develops maintains and enacts a question of ownership, belongings, possession etc etc, it should not unless it is under the usage of a (my) concept. The level or the degree of how much anyone is as one, as a begining and always on with and within anyone or anything including as fleeting of an object as food can be, gives a value known as good or bad for anyone and anything, which is still wrong as it always leads to the (my) concept.
Once a value is existent simply by the default of anyone having initiated, developed, maintained, and enacted a (my) concept of ownership, belongings, possession, etc etc for and by anything or anyone.....then anything or anyone with and within such a structure of none language but it's parallel equivalent, is and will always be only a (my) concept of ownership, belongings, possession etc etc. Meaning there is no love, instead there is (my love), there is no (family, country, God, beliefs, thought's, mind, way, knowledge, will, wisdom etc etc) instead there is only a (my). In such cases, with and within all such cases, all anyone needs, is for anyone to find out what (my) is for anyone, and in knowing that, that anyone knows the value of what comes after the (my) concept. Using the love example again, if and when considering all the language structure used where one word such as love is supposed to include all of its original primary language forms of existence, then any and all combinations off, cannot be a (my) concept as love, as by being so, as soon as the most violent questions of ownership, belongings, possession etc etc are posed and such violent questions are always posed.... with most cases the (my), a specific (my) is droped so quickly, it might even seem as it never existed, showing there is no love in such cases, only a value of (my). The title used here, together with the little story illustrates that, because it shows that a (my) concept always has a value, and if and when that value is a most beautiful, precious stone looking and feeling, of most amazing beautiful visual colours, in the form of a frozen sh*t under a beautiful tree, on the mountains, then a (my), a specific (my) concept, is dropped so quickly, or as in the case of the story is not even picked up, simply based on the fact, that no one, and that is meant as a categorical no one , wants to hold a (my) sh*t as a concept of ownership, belongings, possession etc etc, even in the case of a frozen precious stone looking one. Be that as mother, family, friends, knowledge, wisdom, God, country, will, wife, children, etc etc.
If and when anyone or anything is with and within (love, knowledge, friend, country, God, will, mother, wisdom, family, wife, children, etc etc) as a language structure of its primary origins, that anyone will always be with and within such structural foundation, forever and ever even when the physical or the mental is not there to support it either way. If and when anyone or anything is with and within the same and more as a (my) concept, that (my) any specific or combinations of a (my) has a value, and all values eventually disappear, stop either way.
Meaning all you need is sh*t and the (my) is revealed, it's value.
A friend, (io, ein, on, je ((my)) etc etc) best friend, (so good friend he is, I tell him all the time, you are the best, the smartest, most good-looking, the strongest, the braviest, there is no one like you etc etc no matter what) was living at a refugee center in Germany. One day he went out for a walk, during the walk it began to rain, and rain hard, there was a bus stop where he could take cover from the rain, but in being a very peculiar great friend, he looked some more and spotted an archway under an apartment building, so he took cover there, away from the rain and the streets. During the rain, he spotted a car, a car with people in it. Looking as if searching for someone, while simultaneously laughing. He recognised the car and the people, but did not make much of it at that instance. With the car having left, and the rain starting to ease off, he spotted something unusual at the bus stop, a pram, a pushchair pram, empty, at the bus stop and a thought came to his mind straight away. If and when he had been at the bus stop, taking cover from the rain, standing next to an empty pram, pushchair and the people he knew in the car he recognised, looking as if searching for someone while simultaneously laughing, would be taking pictures, they would have taken a picture of him, at the bus stop, next to a empty pram pushchair, and under heavy rain. The people he recognised, where the security of the refugee camp, he had just split from a girlfriend which he sat often with her at a bus stop talking etc etc, and had began to build a belief, the girl he had just split with, was possibly pregnant because they had been trying to have a child, and that he might be a father, all of this knowledge was with and within him before that day, that walk, the rain, the bus stop, the empty pram pushchair and the car full of people and in that moment as with all other moments I told him, (all you need is sh*t) mein friend. Later on much later on we both heard the chancellor of Germany saying live on TV (you will never walk alone), oh sh*t my friend said, I told you I said, (all you need is sh*t). Of course he replied, but I am beginning to think my social worker has adopted a child of mine that might not be in existence, from the girlfriend that is not a girlfriend no more, and he keeps on smiling at me more than usual. Oh sh*t I replied, to which he laughed and said, (all you need is sh*t) mein friend, that is what you said yes. My friend also told me that he had seen the name Daniela only two specific moments in his life, one having to do with a most beautiful (hot) actress, and the other on a poetry book, on a table at his house where his mother lived, taken just after she had just died of a heart attack, the strange thing about it is that his mother had stopped reading any books for a long time, as she could not see very well, whereas my friend, had been writing about poetry lately and most certainly watched the most beautiful actress from time to time. I did not know what to say to him, except it must be a coincidence.
({ Personal note: With what I have explained, that is the (kufar) and it matters not if such structures prey or not, believe or not, are this or that, any and all of such structures are all (kufar), as it's original language structure understanding, I have no value of a (my) concept nor any language structure connection with any.})
This is where the concept of love, fall's appart if and when used as (my love), meaning something which cannot be owned is given to someone else, which cannot own it either, in return for something which they do not own, to be given back to that someone which cannot own it either way. Taking the example of (mother)..... I do not love my mother, because of a (my) concept of ownership, belonging, possession etc etc instead the love is with and within the (io, ein, on, je etc ... original primary language structure) meaning anyone and their mother are one (as the self), a begining (as either point) and always on (as a start in all directions) no matter. With and within such language as structure, good or bad has nothing to do with it, because it initiates, develops maintains and enacts a question of ownership, belongings, possession etc etc, it should not unless it is under the usage of a (my) concept. The level or the degree of how much anyone is as one, as a begining and always on with and within anyone or anything including as fleeting of an object as food can be, gives a value known as good or bad for anyone and anything, which is still wrong as it always leads to the (my) concept.
Once a value is existent simply by the default of anyone having initiated, developed, maintained, and enacted a (my) concept of ownership, belongings, possession, etc etc for and by anything or anyone.....then anything or anyone with and within such a structure of none language but it's parallel equivalent, is and will always be only a (my) concept of ownership, belongings, possession etc etc. Meaning there is no love, instead there is (my love), there is no (family, country, God, beliefs, thought's, mind, way, knowledge, will, wisdom etc etc) instead there is only a (my). In such cases, with and within all such cases, all anyone needs, is for anyone to find out what (my) is for anyone, and in knowing that, that anyone knows the value of what comes after the (my) concept. Using the love example again, if and when considering all the language structure used where one word such as love is supposed to include all of its original primary language forms of existence, then any and all combinations off, cannot be a (my) concept as love, as by being so, as soon as the most violent questions of ownership, belongings, possession etc etc are posed and such violent questions are always posed.... with most cases the (my), a specific (my) is droped so quickly, it might even seem as it never existed, showing there is no love in such cases, only a value of (my). The title used here, together with the little story illustrates that, because it shows that a (my) concept always has a value, and if and when that value is a most beautiful, precious stone looking and feeling, of most amazing beautiful visual colours, in the form of a frozen sh*t under a beautiful tree, on the mountains, then a (my), a specific (my) concept, is dropped so quickly, or as in the case of the story is not even picked up, simply based on the fact, that no one, and that is meant as a categorical no one , wants to hold a (my) sh*t as a concept of ownership, belongings, possession etc etc, even in the case of a frozen precious stone looking one. Be that as mother, family, friends, knowledge, wisdom, God, country, will, wife, children, etc etc.
If and when anyone or anything is with and within (love, knowledge, friend, country, God, will, mother, wisdom, family, wife, children, etc etc) as a language structure of its primary origins, that anyone will always be with and within such structural foundation, forever and ever even when the physical or the mental is not there to support it either way. If and when anyone or anything is with and within the same and more as a (my) concept, that (my) any specific or combinations of a (my) has a value, and all values eventually disappear, stop either way.
Meaning all you need is sh*t and the (my) is revealed, it's value.
A friend, (io, ein, on, je ((my)) etc etc) best friend, (so good friend he is, I tell him all the time, you are the best, the smartest, most good-looking, the strongest, the braviest, there is no one like you etc etc no matter what) was living at a refugee center in Germany. One day he went out for a walk, during the walk it began to rain, and rain hard, there was a bus stop where he could take cover from the rain, but in being a very peculiar great friend, he looked some more and spotted an archway under an apartment building, so he took cover there, away from the rain and the streets. During the rain, he spotted a car, a car with people in it. Looking as if searching for someone, while simultaneously laughing. He recognised the car and the people, but did not make much of it at that instance. With the car having left, and the rain starting to ease off, he spotted something unusual at the bus stop, a pram, a pushchair pram, empty, at the bus stop and a thought came to his mind straight away. If and when he had been at the bus stop, taking cover from the rain, standing next to an empty pram, pushchair and the people he knew in the car he recognised, looking as if searching for someone while simultaneously laughing, would be taking pictures, they would have taken a picture of him, at the bus stop, next to a empty pram pushchair, and under heavy rain. The people he recognised, where the security of the refugee camp, he had just split from a girlfriend which he sat often with her at a bus stop talking etc etc, and had began to build a belief, the girl he had just split with, was possibly pregnant because they had been trying to have a child, and that he might be a father, all of this knowledge was with and within him before that day, that walk, the rain, the bus stop, the empty pram pushchair and the car full of people and in that moment as with all other moments I told him, (all you need is sh*t) mein friend. Later on much later on we both heard the chancellor of Germany saying live on TV (you will never walk alone), oh sh*t my friend said, I told you I said, (all you need is sh*t). Of course he replied, but I am beginning to think my social worker has adopted a child of mine that might not be in existence, from the girlfriend that is not a girlfriend no more, and he keeps on smiling at me more than usual. Oh sh*t I replied, to which he laughed and said, (all you need is sh*t) mein friend, that is what you said yes. My friend also told me that he had seen the name Daniela only two specific moments in his life, one having to do with a most beautiful (hot) actress, and the other on a poetry book, on a table at his house where his mother lived, taken just after she had just died of a heart attack, the strange thing about it is that his mother had stopped reading any books for a long time, as she could not see very well, whereas my friend, had been writing about poetry lately and most certainly watched the most beautiful actress from time to time. I did not know what to say to him, except it must be a coincidence.
({ Personal note: With what I have explained, that is the (kufar) and it matters not if such structures prey or not, believe or not, are this or that, any and all of such structures are all (kufar), as it's original language structure understanding, I have no value of a (my) concept nor any language structure connection with any.})
Pierre Bourdieu - Entretiens (A Voix nue)
Artesquieu
23,768 views
Après la publication de Choses dites, où Pierre Bourdieu s'interrogeait sur cette parole particulière qu'est l'entretien, il semblait naturel qu'il nous fasse saisir à voix nue ce que parler veut dire. Entretiens avec Roger Chartier sur France Culture (1988)