I am Hungarian from Transylvania. Very proud of my heritage.

It is no coincidence that the tale of the Emperor's New Clothes is Indo-European. It beautifully demonstrates how powerful interests create and maintain an obvious lie out of thin air. At this stage of the Middle Ages, a 10% minority that spoke two languages and was of mixed origin obviously could not have spread a new, difficult to learn, complicated language.

The Hungarian (Magyar) language does not originate from the Uralic territories, as stated above, quite the opposite, it was TAKEN FROM the CARPATHIAN BASIN to the Ural's by large migrating groups of peoples who went east from the Carpathian basin  during the bronze age, or earlier, and encountered along their way the ancestors of present day Uralic people's, which is when they, the Uralic people, picked up some Hungarian words, that they kept until today, which is why it is possible to find some common words between Hungarian and Uralic. This encounter lasted for a limited period of time until the group originating from the Carpathian basin continued their journey all the way to the Tarim basin, in present day China, where they stayed for  several centuries, until they started their journey back home to the Carpathian basin, but now known as Hun's, Avars, Magyar's etc.

As already mentioned, the Magyar language was not introduced in the Carpathian basin with the arrival of the 7 Magyar tribes in 895AD, one or two of which may have had some genetic connections with the Ural's as mentioned above, while four of them came from Mesopotamia and one from central Asia, which was the Megyer (the chief) tribe, hence they had different geographic origins, therefore they can not be considered as a monolithic entity, hence they cannot be assumed to be all of Uralic origins. Therefore, all Hungarians cannot be assumed to be of Uralic origins. That's a deliberate misrepresentation of the truth.
The Magyar language was already spoken in the Carpathian basin at the time the Magyar tribes settled there as evidenced by the Roman historian Ammianus Marcellinus who wrote around 378 A.D., that the Roman Emperor Constantine II wanted to welcome the local inhabitants on the southern side of the Danube, including the Sarmatians, as his obedient subjects, without paying their military wages! The name "obedient subjects" did not please one of the Sarmatians, who pulled off his boots and threw them at the emperor, shouting the words "MARHA - MARHA", where  the word MARHA in present day Hungarian literally means cattle, but pejoratively means fool or idiot (and we still use this curse word in Hungary today to express our disgust) and even millennia before that, as evidenced by it's connections  to language's such as, Etruscan (as explained by the Italian linguist Mario Alinei), Minnoan,  Pelasg/Ancient Greek (as explained by the US linguist Peter Revesz from the University of Nebraska), as well as Sarmatian, Pannon, Hunnic, Sumerian, Iranian, Turkic, Etc. The roots of the Hungarian language go deep into antiquity before the arrival of the Indo-European languages on the European continent and forms a substrate to those languages, that is why today, it is an island in the Indo-European sea. That will be the next major challenge for linguists to discover where that root begins and it definitely isn't  in the Ural's!
So please STOP the erroneous repetitions about the origins of the Magyar language as being Uralic, when all the evidence proves otherwise.

The modern, direct descendants of the Huns and Scythians.

Of course hungarian asian DNA vanished. The warrior rulling class arrived in the Carpathian basin and after a few skirmishes with local lords , they consolidated their power and rightful claim to newly gained lands through marriage,a common practice in that time period . Gesta Hungarorum ,one of their early writings , clearly tells about that web of local alliances and marriages.

Soooo many issues with this AI illustration.. Renaissance and gothic architecture came CENTURIES later.

Attila's son was Irnik, or Csaba, Csaba's son was Ed. Than Ögyek, Előd, Almos, than Àrpàd. 5 generations. We have chronological issues here, not genetic. 4 Chronicles saying precisely the same thing. Clue in please.

Bullshit. DNA did not vanish. Arpad dinasty got extinct only for the male part, not for the females. Todays Hungarians are descendants of Árpád and his tribes.

King Álmos ÁRPAD belonged to TURUL dynasty.Árpad was born around KEVEVÁR today name KIEV.

Let me ask a question to the makers of this video. If the majority of the Hungarian DNA is local. Why not focus on that majority DNA? It seems disingenuous to assume that these people's ancestors came from the Far East when, in fact, they are local. We always want to associate ourselves with conquerors, when in fact we were peasants.

They were a migrating warring people. Everywhere they went, they picked up new local people who had to give up their language, religion and culture. Everyone that lived among hungarians atest to this fact, they imposed themselves.

But if the conquering hungarians were only a minority then how did their language take over? Its always the other way around, the minority elite takes up the language of the masses ( Norsemen took up slavic Russian, Bulgarian Turks took up slavic Bulgarian )

Lies, lies and lies

the horde of time travellers, self entitled historians, genetics masters and everything knowers, explaining suppositions of supposedly happened happenings.

The main issue is not who the Hungarian origins were but why were (and still) are their narrative so acrimonious and insolent when addressing their neighbors histories.

First, utmost important, the cradle of Magyar language is not the lands east of the Urals where the Khanty nd Mansi live but further east, on the Lena river in Yakutia where 4500 years ago the Urheimat of the Magyar and Proto Uralic language had been. With Seima-Turbino Phenomenon, about 4000 years ago, this Late Neolitic Bronze Age people started a rapid movement towards the Urals where the Proto Uralic languages further developed after which they  branched in NE Europe Finns and Estonians, Magyars moving west and Mansy and Khanty staying put. The DNA science shows that only the Nganasan people of Yakutia have traces on LNBA genetics.

How did a language from Lena river in Yakutia traveled to Urals, stayed there for 2500 years?, and then started to move with LNBA genetics reduced to 10% in Finns, 2% in Estonians and zero in Hungary, even though the Hungarians make the biggest noise and their origin theories are the most demented of all??

That Proto Magyars mixed with Sarmatians and Xiongnu is evident; they borrowed 100% of the steppe people's weapons and military capabilities.
But that does not answers a major question. Why did the other steppe people vanished and the weaker oner - the Magyars - survived. We know that in Levedia and then in Etelkoz the Magyars were in close contact with the Oguz, the Bulghars, the Khazars, the Pechenegs, much stronger people.

The answer is Etelkoz, today's Moldova. Magyars proceeded to take slaves from the neighboring sedentary people and sell them in Byzantine markets. A very lucrative business. But that hurt the Khazars and Pechenegs business which is why the Khazars ordered the Pechenegs to attack the Magyars from the east and the Bulghars from the south, in a pincer movement.

Running for their lives, the Magyars circled the Carpathians and crossed the Vereke Pass. In the Pannonian basin   the Magyars found their best change to dominated others. Pasture for the horses and weak neighbors who they immediately treated as serves, dominating from the get go. And then started to pillage Europe in all directions except east, in 55 major campaigns.

"A Sagittis Hungarorum Libera Nos Domine" was the prayer in Europe. Europe was raped and plundered - by the Magyars!

Now, if the above production is a panegyric, extolling the endurance of Magyar language, the narrative showed by genetics invites our critical thinking to not abandon reason and... to ponder. How did a small population of steppe warriors could subdue and order a population of mixed locals twenty times larger to do their bidding. Was it a pleasant ,romantic exchange, or was a mix of terror and total subjugation. Germans were proud people and so were the Slavs who kept their culture. But Magyars imposed their language. Under threat and fear, the subjugated had no choice but to... live. Avars did the same but were eventually wiped out by the Bulgars.

It is not worth discussing the genetic mix - an intense genetic process that resulted in zero Lena LNBA genetics and 4-5% Uralic genes in modern Hungarian population. Science finally put the quest to ...rest. Or did it???

The Major current problem is the Hungarian Narratives, a host of them, that keep continuing, each designed to belittle their neighbors while obtuse claims abound.

It is this Violence, Anger, and Hatred from the part of the Hungarians directed towards all the neighbors, and Europe as well for not giving them what? Nobody knows what, because Hungarian claims and demands are so varied and confused and irrational and untoward that the very Hungarian temperament is being questioned, their demands ridiculed, their unfriendliness discussed. Sad facts.

So, the question follows, when will Magyarization be put to rest, explained as a coercive and unethical  process that lasted centuries and cannot be denied And, And, when will Hungarians accept that they are identical with their neighbors and their absurd narratives must stop?! Peace!

haha...conquer hungarians were always  about 10% minority when they arrived ,archaeologists know this from the numbers of the graves too

As for those steppe nomads—the so-called Hungarians—even if any of them actually arrived here, there is no trace of them left today, save for that artificial language containing 30% unknown words, 20% Slavic, 20% Uralic, and some Turkic, Germanic, and other elements. Just as they are nondescript, so too is their language.