Who's watching eystreem video for a long time?❤

I wish I could have them as a night light those are so cool looking

Hey ey I was eating cereal when you said silverfish was in my cereal😢😢😮😂

When you see dripstone in real life, it’s so cool. I saw it when I was 4

What you saw was a flail. Not a mace. Here's an essay on this concept:

Maces and flails are two of the most iconic melee weapons from medieval warfare, often associated with knights, foot soldiers, and the brutality of close combat. While both are blunt-force weapons designed to inflict damage through crushing rather than cutting, their construction, use, and historical significance differ in key ways. Understanding these differences reveals not only their function on the battlefield but also the evolution of military technology during the Middle Ages.

The mace is a relatively simple yet effective weapon that consists of a solid shaft topped with a heavy head, often made of metal. The head might be flanged, knobbed, or spiked to concentrate force on a smaller point, increasing its penetrating power against armor. Maces evolved from basic clubs and were used by various cultures throughout history, including the ancient Egyptians, Persians, and Romans. By the 11th century, the medieval mace had become a staple of European warfare, favored for its ability to dent or crush armor.

In contrast, the flail is a more complex weapon, typically consisting of a handle (or shaft) connected to a striking end by a flexible chain or rope. This design allows the flail's striking head to swing around shields and other defenses, making it more unpredictable and difficult to block. The classic image of a flail often includes a spiked ball, but historical flails varied greatly, and many were simple agricultural tools adapted for combat. Peasant armies were known to use flails derived from threshing tools.

One of the primary differences between the two lies in their control. The mace, being a solid, one-piece weapon, offers better control, especially in formation fighting where precision and coordination are critical. Soldiers could strike with power and accuracy using a mace. Flails, however, require more skill and space to use effectively. Their swinging heads can be difficult to control and pose a risk to the user and nearby allies, making them more suited for individual combat or ambush tactics.

From a historical perspective, the mace enjoyed a longer and more prominent role in formal military use. Maces were widely adopted by both infantry and cavalry and were even used as symbols of power and authority. Many medieval rulers and bishops carried ceremonial maces as signs of office. In battle, maces were valued for their simplicity, durability, and effectiveness against increasingly heavy plate armor.

The flail, while dramatic in appearance and often featured in fantasy and popular media, is somewhat rarer in the archaeological and historical record. Some historians debate how widespread combat flails truly were, suggesting that they were never mass-produced on the same scale as swords, spears, or maces. However, they were certainly used, especially in Eastern Europe and among militias who adapted farming tools for war.

The psychological impact of these weapons also differed. A flail’s wild, unpredictable motion could intimidate opponents, and the chain could entangle weapons or limbs. Meanwhile, the mace, with its heavy, deliberate strikes, conveyed raw power. On the battlefield, this often meant that maces were more reliable, while flails could be devastating in the hands of a skilled and daring fighter.

Tactically, the two weapons served different roles. Maces were often used to break enemy lines, crush helmets, and batter shields. Their straightforward usage made them ideal for disciplined troops. Flails, on the other hand, could be used to bypass shield walls or disarm enemies with quick, whipping motions. This made them useful in less organized skirmishes or guerrilla-style engagements.

Armor also influenced the development and use of these weapons. As mail and plate armor became more common, cutting weapons like swords became less effective. Blunt weapons like maces rose in prominence because they could cause concussive damage even without penetrating armor. Flails, with their ability to generate powerful centrifugal force, also remained effective, though harder to master.

In conclusion, while both maces and flails are blunt weapons used in medieval combat, their design, use, and historical context set them apart. Maces, with their simplicity and reliability, were widely adopted and respected as both weapons and symbols of authority. Flails, though more exotic and difficult to control, offered unique advantages and a psychological edge in battle. Together, they highlight the diversity of weaponry in the medieval period and the creative ways in which people sought to overcome the challenges of war.

the mushurms that glow exist in real life!     ( did you now that )

Yeah, that rod was there all the time.

You didn't know that silverfish exist either??? Tho I have to admit it's terrifying that they're in cereal I didn't know that

They could’ve made I mean, they could’ve put red diamonds up there

The steve one is kinda cute

That Course fruit is literally a dragon fruit

A nite fairy will definitely win against a phantom

imagine you have a lot of does obsidian ：you try to make an nether portal：it works 4:36

Golden apples are a real fruit. They are different species of 🍎

I've seen A lot of your videos and the won where you saw the bone creeper it was on the side of your screen YOUR BLIND!!!!!

This dude is so strong he did it with his hands he's the hulk And also how did he make that portal And how did he find that How did he find that obsidian

Well, the guy who minded the city is an actual God

Wow, I like your reaction to real life Minecraft, and this is my favorite, the one you called Steve and made a real life nether portals

Bro they look so realistic 😮😮😮😮😮

0:26 wow Jordan's that gullible