I started reading marvel in the late 1960's, early 70's. The fantastic four have always been my favorites.

Nice

9:08 Hit the switch JUST AS the trolley's front wheels pass the switch, but BEFORE the back wheels do, causing the trolley to either stop or de-rail. 😁🤟

5:23 is that Reed, at the very far right reading something, as a version of the Comedian from the Watchmen series? 😂 that’s hilarious 😅

🔥

What were the long term consequences to Ben Grimm?

Where's the rest ?.

spiderman is an arm wrestler, look at his developed pronator , next up devon larratt no limits

u think if dooms mask was a smiley face hed be looked at way he is

If you suddenly change the direction of a train going full speed it will derail killing nobody

no your utterlly and inconceivabley insane , no thats called character development with hint of foreshadowing

I'll say this about the Thing......
If they wanted to cure him they'd let Franklin do it 😂

They don't.

You bringing up the 'trolly' philosophical example to support your point about 'doing the lesser of all evil' is not accurate. The great TV show The Good Place literally built a set and spent 10 minutes putting the characters on a literal trolly just to also make a point about 'lesser of all evil.' Both you and the whole crew of the TV show completely missed the point of that thought experiment. The core of the 'trolly' idea is that a trolly is going to hit, let's say 3 people, on the tracks ahead of it, and those three people are going to die unless YOU pull a lever to change the track, changing the trolly's trajectory towards just one person on a side track. The point being, are YOU willing to take personal responsibility for the death of one person or do nothing and allow three people to die, through no direct fault of your own. So yes, there is a surface meaning about killing one to save three. But there are two deeper meanings of how you answer. A deeper layer involves your personal involvement in the direct death of one person and how that guilt can be moralized. And the deepest meaning is about the moral responsibility of inaction doing more harm to 'the greater good' than a moral justification of a personal 'wrong' causing less, but you being personally responsible & facing any consequences of your direct action in justifying your direct cause of any harm. Is a society, and a jury of your 'peers,' willing to forgive your direct action in causing one death when an accidental death of three people wouldn't lead to anybody personally being at fault?  The 'trolly' example is more about Einstein's quote, ' The world will not be destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who watch them without doing anything,' a reference to allowing the Nazi Party to rise to power, and not really about 'doing the lesser of two evils.'

reed is analogue for god, and franklin jesus of nazereth

Hey rob
This full story isn't full (the last episode is missing)
Leave this great video without the ending
Please please please add the last episode as I love this story so much

💙💜🩷💝❤️🧡💛🩵

On behalf of Lord DOOM, i clam FIRST